Free Access

This article has an erratum: [https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201732442e]


Table 1.

Continuum detections at S/N ≥ 4.5.

ID RAJ2000 DecJ2000 S/N S1.1 mm, peak S1.1 mm,uv−fit z
(hh:mm:ss.ss) (±dd:mm:ss.ss) (mJy beam−1) (mJy)
A2744-ID01a 00:14:19.80 −30:23:07.66 25.9 1.433 ± 0.056 1.570 ± 0.073 2.9c
A2744-ID02a 00:14:18.25 −30:24:47.47 14.4 1.292 ± 0.091 2.816 ± 0.229 2.482c
A2744-ID03a 00:14:20.40 −30:22:54.42 13.9 0.798 ± 0.058 1.589 ± 0.125 d
A2744-ID04a 00:14:17.58 −30:23:00.56 13.8 0.932 ± 0.068 1.009 ± 0.074 d
A2744-ID05a 00:14:19.12 −30:22:42.20 7.7 0.655 ± 0.086 1.113 ± 0.135 d
A2744-ID06a 00:14:17.28 −30:22:58.60 6.5 0.574 ± 0.089 1.283 ± 0.241 d
A2744-ID07a 00:14:22.10 −30:22:49.67 6.2 0.455 ± 0.074 0.539 ± 0.082 d
A2744-ID08b 00:14:24.73 −30:24:34.20 4.8 0.270 ± 0.056
A2744-ID09b 00:14:21.23 −30:23:28.70 4.7 0.256 ± 0.055
A2744-ID10b 00:14:17.72 −30:23:02.25 4.5 0.286 ± 0.063
A2744-ID11b 00:14:22.63 −30:23:30.45 4.5 0.253 ± 0.056
MACS J0416-ID01a 04:16:10.79 −24:04:47.53 15.4 1.010 ± 0.066 1.319 ± 0.103 2.086c
MACS J0416-ID02a 04:16:06.96 −24:03:59.96 6.8 0.406 ± 0.062 0.574 ± 0.132 1.953c
MACS J0416-ID03a 04:16:08.81 −24:05:22.58 5.8 0.389 ± 0.067 0.411 ± 0.072 d
MACS J0416-ID04a 04:16:11.67 −24:04:19.44 5.1 0.333 ± 0.066 0.478 ± 0.166 d
MACS J0416-ID05b 04:16:10.52 −24:05:04.77 4.6 0.302 ± 0.066 1.849e
MACS J1149-ID01a 11:49:36.09 +22:24:24.60 5.9 0.442 ± 0.074 0.579 ± 0.134 1.46c
MACS J1149-ID02b 11:49:40.32 +22:24:42.00 4.6 0.524 ± 0.113
MACS J1149-ID03b 11:49:35.41 +22:23:38.60 4.5 0.326 ± 0.072

Notes. Column 1: Source ID. Columns 2, 3: Centroid J2000 position of ID. Column 4: Signal-to-noise of the detection. Column 5: PB-corrected peak intensity and 1σ error. Column 6: PB-corrected integrated flux density and 1σ error from uv fitting. Column 7: Source redshift.

(a)

High-significance (S/N ≥ 5) detections. Already reported in Paper I.

(b)

Low-significance (4.5 ≤ S/N <  5) detections. Instead of performing a uv fitting, we estimate the integrated flux density using the peak intensity and assuming given source size parameters (see Sect. 2.1.2). Since all but one of them lack clear counterparts (partly due to contamination) and spectroscopic redshifts, nor were they included in Paper II study, we assume a Gaussian redshift distribution with mean z = 2 and σ = 0.5 for these sources.

(c)

Spectroscopic redshift from GLASS, already noted in Paper II.

(d)

Photometric redshift found in Paper II. Best fit value and 1σ error from SED fitting are presented here only for reference, as we use the full probability distribution found for each photometric redshift.

(e)

Spectroscopic redshift from GLASS.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.