Table 2

Reliability and completeness of AGN selection techniques.

X-ray MIR SED OIII Radio Any
X-ray 25.7% (106/412) 38.6% (159/412) 21.1% (87/412) 74.5% (307/412) 88.6% (365/412)
MIR 38.1% (106/278) 67.6% (188/278) 22.7% (63/278) 64.0% (178/278) 88.5% (246/278)
SED 16.1% (159/988) 19.0% (188/988) 5.4% (53/988) 93.0% (919/988) 97.3% (961/988)
[O III] 32.5% (87/268) 23.5% (63/268) 19.8% (53/268) 40.7% (109/268) 66.0% (177/268)
Radio 8.1% (307/3791) 4.7% (178/3791) 24.2% (919/3791) 2.9% (109/3791) 30.5% (1155/3791)
All 10.1% (412/4087) 6.8% (278/4087) 24.2% (988/4087) 6.6% (268/4087) 92.8% (3791/4087)

Notes. For reliability, the table should be read from left to right. For example, the percentage of X-ray AGN that are MIR AGN is 25.7% and the percentage of radio AGN that are any other kind of AGN is 30.5%. For completeness, the table should be read top to bottom. For example, X-ray AGN probe 16.1% of SED AGN and MIR AGN probe 23.5% of [O III] AGN.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.