Open Access

Table 5.

Comparison with SCUBA observations from Di Francesco et al. (2008).

Name SCUBA 850 μm
Comparison SMA / SCUBA
Peak intensity Effective radius Flux density Rescaled peak intensitya Peak intensity ratio Total flux ratio

(Jy/beam) (″) (Jy) (Jy/SMA beam) SMA/SCUBA SMA/SCUBA
B335 1.45±0.14 34.5 2.38±0.36 0.46±0.07 0.52±0.09 0.09±0.02
HH797 1.76±0.18 43.2 4.67±0.70 0.57±0.09 1.24±0.22 0.12±0.03
L1448C 2.37±0.24 43.5 4.15±0.62 0.77±0.12 0.84±0.15 0.14±0.03
L1448N 5.46±0.55 49.3 10.18±1.53 0.96±0.14 1.27±0.23 0.15±0.04
L1448-2A 1.41±0.14 36.8 2.24±0.34 0.24±0.04 0.97±0.17 0.15±0.04
IRAS03282 1.30±0.13 45.2 2.28±0.34 0.42±0.06 1.54±0.28 0.18±0.04
NGC 1333 IRAS4A 11.4±0.11 38.5 14.4±2.16 1.40±0.21 1.83±0.33 0.17±0.04
NGC 1333 IRAS4B 5.46±0.55 40.7 8.90±1.34 0.75±0.11 3.83±0.69b 0.16±0.04
IRAS16293 20.2±0.20 56.8 29.5±4.43 3.43±0.51 1.12±0.20 0.16±0.04
L1157 1.58±0.16 42.4 2.46±0.37 0.59±0.09 1.20±0.22 0.17±0.04
CB230 1.22±0.12 43.2 2.35±0.35 0.45±0.07 0.82±0.15 0.09±0.02

Notes.

(a)

In order to estimate what the peak intensity of the SCUBA maps would correspond to in a SMA beam, we considered that the envelope follows a r−2 density profile, thus that the intensity would scale in 1/r. The SMA beam for each source is provided in Table 3. The SCUBA FWHM at 850 μm is 14″. SVS13 is not included in the table because SVS13-A and B are not resolved by SCUBA.

(b)

This high value can be explained by the very flat intensity profile of the source that is barely resolved in our SMA observations (see Fig. 3).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.