Table 2
Objects in the GLQ database.
Object | za | Nima b | Δ θc (′′) | rd (mag) | Ref | Δte (d) | Ref | Lensing galaxyf | Ref |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSO B0909+532 | 1.38 | 2 | 1.1 | 16−17 | 1 | 50 ![]() |
2 | E (z = 0.83) | 3, 4, 5 |
FBQS J0951+2635 | 1.24 | 2 | 1.1 | 17−18 | 6 | 16 ± 2 | 7 | E (z = 0.26) | 8, 9 |
QSO B0957+561 | 1.41 | 2 | 6.1 | 17 | 10, 11 | 416.5 ± 1.0⋆ | 12 | E-cD (z = 0.36) | 13, 14, 15 |
SDSS J1001+5027 | 1.84 | 2 | 2.9 | 17.5−18 | 16 | 119.3 ± 3.3 | 17 | E (z = 0.41) | 18 |
SDSS J1339+1310 | 2.24 | 2 | 1.7 | 19 | 19 | 47 ![]() |
20 | E (z = 0.61) | 21 |
QSO B1413+117 | 2.55 | 4 | 1.4 | ~18 | 22 | 23 ± 4 | 23 | ? (z = 1.88)⋆⋆ | 23 |
SDSS J1442+4055 | 2.57 | 2 | 2.1 | 18−19 | 24, 25 | 25 ![]() |
26 | E (z = 0.28) | 26 |
SDSS J1515+1511 | 2.05 | 2 | 2.0 | 18−19 | 27 | 211 ± 5 | 28 | S (z = 0.74) | 27, 28, 29 |
QSO B2237+0305 | 1.69 | 4 | 1.8 | 17.5−18.5 | 30, 31 | 1.5 ± 2.0 | 32 | SBb (z = 0.04) | 30, 31 |
Notes. (a) Source redshift; (b) number of quasar images; (c)angular separation between images for double quasars or typical angular size for quadruple quasars; (d) r-band magnitudes of quasar images (these values should be interpreted with caution, since we deal with variable objects); (e) measured time delay for double quasars or the longest of the measured delays for quadruple quasars (1σ confidence interval); (f) classification (redshift). (⋆) Time delay in the g-band. There is evidence of chromaticity in the optical delay, since it is 420.6 ± 1.9 d in the r-band. (⋆⋆) Redshift from gravitational lensing data and a concordance cosmology. This measurement is in reasonable agreement with the photometric redshift of the secondary lensing galaxy and the most distant overdensity, as well as the redshift of one of the absorption systems. References. (1) Kochanek et al. (1997); (2) Hainline et al. (2013) (see also Goicoechea et al. 2008); (3) Oscoz et al. (1997); (4) Lehár et al. (2000); (5) Lubin et al. (2000); (6) Schechter et al. (1998); (7) Jakobsson et al. (2005); (8) Kochanek et al. (2000); (9) Eigenbrod et al. (2007); (10) Walsh et al. (1979); (11) Weymann et al. (1979); (12) Shalyapin et al. (2012) (see also Kundić et al. 1997; Shalyapin et al. 2008); (13) Stockton (1980); (14) Young et al. (1980); (15) Young et al. (1981a); (16) Oguri et al. (2005); (17) Rathna Kumar et al. (2013); (18) Inada et al. (2012); (19) Inada et al. (2009); (20) Goicoechea & Shalyapin (2016); (21) Shalyapin & Goicoechea (2014a); (22) Magain et al. (1988); (23) Goicoechea & Shalyapin (2010) (see also Akhunov et al. 2017); (24) Sergeyev et al. (2016); (25) More et al. (2016); (26) Shalyapin & Goicoechea (in prep.); (27) Inada et al. (2014); (28) Shalyapin & Goicoechea (2017); (29) Rusu et al. (2016); (30) Huchra et al. (1985); (31) Yee (1988); (32) Vakulik et al. (2006).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.