Free Access

Fig. 4

image

Comparison between our abundance patterns and previous ones in the literature (Edvardsson 1988; Neuforge-Verheecke & Magain 1997; Luck 2018; Allende Prieto et al. 2004; Gilli et al. 2006; Porto de Mello et al. 2008; Bruntt et al. 2010; Jofré et al. 2015). For elementswith abundances corresponding to two ionisation stages, we followed the procedure outlined in Sect. 5.2. The results are shown as a function of Tc (Lodders 2003). For each study, the metal abundances of α Cen A and B relative to hydrogen, [X/H], are shown in the top and middle panels, respectively. A dashed line is drawn at [Fe/H]. Bottom panel: abundance differences, Δ [X/H], between α Cen A and B. To guide the eye, a dashed line is drawn at Δ[X/H] = 0. The dotted line indicates the mean difference, while the grey strip shows the corresponding 1σ uncertainties. For Edvardsson (1988), Porto de Mello et al. (2008) and our study, the uncertainties for elements other than iron refer to [X/Fe], not [X/H]. However, they are expected to be representative.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.