Table A.1
Best fit parameters of the SFR vs. inclination relation under different SFR normalisations.
| λ | This MS | Speagle MS | Schreiber MS | MIR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slope | Intercept | Slope | Intercept | Slope | Intercept | Slope | Intercept | |
| SFRUV z ~ 0 | −0.78  |
−0.20  |
−0.76  |
−0.11  |
−0.75  |
−0.54  |
−0.59 |
−0.27 |
| SFRMIR z ~ 0 | −0.12  |
0.05  |
−0.10  |
0.14  |
−0.08  |
−0.29  |
– | – |
| SFRFIR z ~ 0 | −0.06  |
0.68  |
−0.02  |
0.81  |
0.04  |
0.40  |
0.05 |
0.26  |
| SFRradio z ~ 0 | −0.10  |
0.52  |
−0.09  |
0.69  |
−0.07  |
0.31  |
0.23 |
−0.07 |
| SFRUV z ~ 0.7 | −0.54  |
−0.74  |
−0.59  |
−0.85  |
−0.59  |
−0.94  |
−0.60 |
−1.00 |
| SFRMIR z ~ 0.7 | −0.03  |
0.28  |
−0.05  |
0.16  |
−0.04  |
0.06  |
– | – |
| SFRFIR z ~ 0.7 | −0.02  |
0.54  |
−0.03  |
0.43  |
−0.03  |
0.33  |
0.16  |
−0.02 |
| SFRradio z ~ 0.7 | −0.17  |
0.68  |
−0.14  |
0.55  |
−0.13  |
0.45  |
0.29  |
−0.05 |
Notes. Column 1 is a repeat of Table 3 (to facilitate comparison), Cols. 2 and 3 show the best fitting parameters obtained when using the Speagle et al. (2014) and Schreiber et al. (2015) MS relations to normalise the SFR. Column 4 shows the best-fit parameters when the SFR of each galaxy is normalised by its MIR SFR.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.