Free Access
This article is an erratum for:

Volume 613, May 2018
Article Number C3
Number of page(s) 1
Section Extragalactic astronomy
Published online 31 May 2018

In Sect. 3.2.1 of Varenius et al. (2016), Eq. (2) was missing an exponent. The correct equation is (1)

as given by Kim & Trippe (2014). Although written incorrectly in the text, we emphasize that the correct equation was used to generate Figs. 5b–d.

The peak surface brightness values published in Table 3 and Fig. 7 for convolved images were given as twice the true values. A factor of two was missing when converting from convolved units of Jy beam−1 into Jy arcsec−2. The correct values are given here in Table 1 and Fig. 1. We note that since both measured and simulated values were scaled by the same factor, the ratio of 60% referred to in Sect. 4.3.1 was correct, although the model surface brightness quoted at 150 MHz (after convolving to 0.′′7 × 0.′′5) should be corrected to 90 mJy arcsec−2. We emphasize that the error in these peak surface brightness values does not affect the modeling or conclusions in the paper as these were based on integrated flux densities or peak values in units of Jy beam−1.


  1. Kim, J.-Y., & Trippe, S. 2014, J. Korean Astron. Soc., 47, 195 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Varenius, E., Conway, J. E., Martí-Vidal, I., et al. 2016, A&A, 593, A86 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

© ESO 2018

All Tables

Table 1

Values to replace Table 3 in Varenius et al. (2016).

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Figure to replace Fig. 7 in Varenius et al. (2016).

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.