EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 612 (April 2018) A&A, 612 (2018) A35 Full HTML
Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 612, April 2018
Article Number A35
Number of page(s) 11
Section Extragalactic astronomy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731383
Published online 16 April 2018

© ESO 2018

1 Introduction

Planetary nebulae (PNe) are widely used to trace stellar populations in external galaxies, providing accurate information regarding the luminosity, age, metallicity, and dynamics of their progenitor stellar population. Their bright emission lines, and in particular the [OIII]λ5007 Å nebular line, provide a distinctive characteristic that makes them easy to identify in continuum-subtracted, narrowband images. Planetary nebulae are especially useful to highlight stellar population in regions of very low surface brightness, such as the outermost regions of galaxies (Corradi et al. 2015) and the intergalactic medium (Longobardi et al. 2015; Arnaboldi et al. 2016) as far as 100 Mpc (e.g. Gerhard et al. 2007). The rich and complex structures highlighted in recent years in numerous galaxies by extensive broadband imaging surveys have opened a unique laboratory to test not only galactic evolution models but also the history and possible interactions between galaxies in and outside the local group. In this respect, PNe can play a key role as chemical and dynamical witnesses of these processes. Assuming a single-star evolutionary scenario, PN progenitors are expected to be low and intermediate mass stars with masses between ~0.7 and 8 M⊙ (Badenes et al. 2015). During their evolution these stars do not significantly modify abundances of α-elements such as oxygen, neon, argon, and sulphur, thereby preserving the original composition of the gas cloud from which the progenitor star formed. Because of their typical progenitor star lifetimes of between 0.1 and 10 Gyr, PNe offer a direct look into the past (Magrini et al. 2009). These objects are used to determine metallicity gradients and their temporal evolution by means of comparing the PNe metallicity with those of younger stellar populations, such as HII regions or OB stars (Magrini & Gonçalves 2009; Annibali et al. 2017).

The kinematics of the stellar population can be inferred by measuring the line-of-sight velocity of a PN population (Arnaboldi 2012 and references therein). Moreover, the [OIII]λ5007 Å PN luminosity function (PNLF) has been proven to be a robust secondary extragalactic distance candle, providing 10% accuracy in large galaxies of all Hubble types (Ciardullo 2013).

Deep studies of the bright disc of M 33 confirmed a wealth of HII regions (Wyder et al. 1997; Hodge et al. 1999) and PNe. The first comprehensive search for PNe was performed by Magrini et al. (2000) and provided 131 PN candidates. A subsequent search by Ciardullo et al. (2004) added several new candidates and spectroscopically confirmed 140 PNe. The analysis of the spectra pointed out dynamical properties that are consistent with the old disc from the velocity dispersion field of 138 of the PNe; the other 2 PNe are possibly related to a spheroidal component. A detailed discussion of the PNLF of M 33 was included in this analysis along with a comparison of the inner and outer disc PNLF, thereby supporting the independence of the bright cut-off with the metallicity suggested in Ciardullo et al. (2002) and displaying a decrease of the PNLF at fainter magnitudes.

The radial metallicity gradient of M 33 and its evolution with time was inferred by Magrini et al. (2009) and revisited in Magrini et al. (2016); these works claimed a tight relationship between O/H and Ne/H abundances and excluded the modificationof both elements by the PN progenitors. The comparison between PNe and HII regions abundances homogeneously analysed in Magrini et al. (2016) indicates a low global enrichment of the M 33 disc from the epoch of the formation of the PN progenitors to the present time, following the nearly identical slope of the oxygen gradients of PNe and HII regions.

The PN radial gradient data extend out to 8 kpc from the centre of the galaxy. It would be very interesting to explore whether these measurements can be extended to larger galactocentric distances and to compare these measurements with results obtained with broadband stellar studies of the outskirts of M 33 and test whether a flattening of the gradient is present as found in similar galaxies (e.g. Bresolin et al. 2009). Motivated by the paradigmatic case of M 31, which shows a variety of organized and irregular structures located well beyond its classical disc, and inside which a number of PNe have been found (Merrett et al. 2006), we decided to embark on the search for analogous structures in M 33 using PNe.

Early observations of M 33 in the 21 cm HI line (Rogstad et al. 1976) showed a severe disc warp; this indicates that M 33 is not as pristine as it appeared in the optical counterpart known at that time. A first deep optical survey (Ferguson et al. 2007) showed no distortions or substructures on the outskirts of the galaxy, but subsequent and deeper surveys claimed, first, the detection of a stellar halo (Ibata et al. 2007), and then the presence of a large, irregular, low surface brightness stellar substructure surrounding the galaxy (McConnachie et al. 2009, 2010).

McConnachie et al. (2009) found the structure to be composed of an old stellar population (⟨[Fe∕H]⟩~-1.6 dex), reaching as far as about 40 kpc from the centre in the northwest and southeast quadrants. These authors also suggested that the tidal disruption of M 33 in its orbit around M 31 would be the cause of the formation of the structure. Further insights about this possible interaction between the two spiral galaxies were gained by means of N-body simulations (McConnachie et al. 2009). The interaction between the two galaxies would have occurred 2–3 Gyr ago and would have triggered a burst of star formation in both galaxies supported by studies of stellar populations located well beyond the limit of their bright classical discs (Barker et al. 2011; Bernard et al. 2012). More recent simulations, however, do not support this scenario (Patel et al. 2017).

The PNe in M 33 can be used as an independent tracer of the interaction and star forming episodes, as their brightest representatives are predicted to be produced by stars in an age range covering the period of the supposed M 31–M 33 encounter (Schönberner et al. 2007). The presence, or otherwise, of PNe in these regions therefore provides key information about and a quantitative measure of the luminosity of the underlying stellar population (Buzzoni et al. 2006).

2 Observations

Images were taken during seven nights on September and October 2013 using the Wide Field Camera (WFC) at the prime focus of the 2.54 m Isaac Newton Telescope (INT) of the Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos at the island of La Palma (Spain).

The WFC is an optical mosaic camera consisting of four thinned EEV CCDs with 2048 × 4096 pixels each and a scale of 0.33 arcsec pixel−1. The size of the mosaic as projected in the sky is 34.2 arcmin with ~1 arcmin inter-chip gaps.

Seventeen overlapping fields were observed (Fig. 1), covering a total region of 4.5 square degrees and reaching a maximum projected distance of about 40 kpc from the centre of the galaxy.

The emission-line filters used were [OIII], which has a central wavelength and full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 5008 and 100 Å, respectively; Hα+[NII] (6568/95 Å); and the broadband g′ (4846/1285 Å) and r′ (6240/1347 Å) filters of the Sloan photometric system to evaluate the continuum emission and to distinguish PNe from stars. To allow cosmic ray removal, three exposures were obtained at each telescope position and for each filter, except at one of the telescope positions (M 33 17) where only [OIII] and g′ images could be taken. Exposure times were 1200 s for both [OIII] and Hα, and 400 s for r′ and g′. The seeing during observations ranged from 0.9 to 1.5 arcsec. The observing log is shown in Table 1.

Spectra of three PNe candidates were obtained in December 2014 in service-queue mode using the auxiliary-port camera and spectrograph ACAM at the 4.2 m William Herschel Telescope (WHT), also at La Palma. The long slit was opened to 1″ and the exposure time for each object was ~1 h with the low resolution V400 grism, covering the wavelength range between 3500 and 9400 Å. The log of these observations is presented in Table 2. Objects presented here are named GCMnn.

thumbnail Fig. 1

M 33 observed fields. The total field of view of the image is 3° × 4°. North is up, east at left.
Open with DEXTER
Table 1

INT imaging.

Table 2

WHT spectroscopy.

3 Data reduction

Data were debiased and flat fielded using the ING WFC data reduction pipeline (Irwin & Lewis 2001). At each telescope position, images were aligned to one of the [OIII] frames, correcting for geometrical distortions. Then all images in the same filter were averaged. These steps were performed using routines available within IRAF1. Astrometric solutions were computed using the tasks SCAMP and MISSFITS (Bertin 2006; Marmo & Bertin 2008) and the SDSS-R9 catalogue (Ahn et al. 2012). The accuracy of astrometry is ~0.1″.

Nights were photometric and instrumental magnitudes for the broadband filters were calibrated by matching stars in the observed fields with the SDSS-R9 catalogue, taking advantage of the large number of stars available. For the narrowband Hα images, we used the same zero point as that derived for the r′ band, as shown in Drew et al. (2005). The emission-line fluxes in the narrowband filter [OIII] were calibrated using the magnitudes of 31 PNe in Ciardullo et al. (2004), which are included in our fields 16, 21, and 22. The [OIII]λ5007 Å magnitudes (m5007) are related to the monochromatic flux by (1)

where F5007 is expressed in ergs cm−2 s−1 (Jacoby 1989).

The photometric solution was then extended to all observed fields using the overlapping areas in different pointings. The PNe from Ciardullo et al. (2004) used to calibrate our [OIII] images and their corresponding identification number and m5007 are shown in Table 3. Also shown are the corresponding identification numbers in Magrini et al. (2000) and the final magnitudes obtained for our data after the calibration of the fields.

Photometric errors derived internally from DAOPHOT, photon statistics, and background uncertainties are small and generally lower than the typical systematic errors. We have to account for the uncertainty from the calibration sources in Ciardullo et al. (2004) and the dispersion term for each calculated zero point, including the systematic error of their propagation. Adding all of the sources of uncertainty through least squares, an error up to ~0.1 mag for m[OIII] ≤ 24.5 was estimated, increasing to 0.4 mag for m[OIII] ≤ 25.5. These errorsare larger for faintest sources.

Spectra were reduced (debiased, overscan corrected, trimmed, flat fielded, combined, and finally sky subtracted and extracted) using the packages CCDRED and TWODSPEC in IRAF. Before subtracting the sky background, cosmic rays were eliminated using the task lacos spec (van Dokkum 2001). The flux calibration was carried out using the standard star Feige 15 (Stone 1977). More details are given in Sect. 5.2.

Table 3

Known PNe used for the [OIII] calibration.

4 Data analysis

The PN search was made in two different ways: by visual inspection of the combined set of narrow and broadband images and via the analysis of colour–colour diagrams from automated photometric measurements.

As mentioned before, 31 of the known PNe in M 33 are located in a region of about 0.4 square degrees close to the bright disc of the galaxy, which is a zone that was partially covered by three of our mapped regions. Those PNe were used as a reference sample for the visual and photometric searches.

4.1 Visual search

The g′ images were used as the reference continuum for the [OIII] frames and the r′ images were used as reference continuum for Hα. Various display colours were assigned to images in different filters to create colour-composite images in which we searched for sources with Hα and [OIII] excesses. Specifically, red was assigned to the wide filter g′ or r′ , and green to the narrow filter [OIII] or Hα, which makes point-source emission-line objects appear as outstanding green dots in both the [OIII]/g′ and Hα/r′ colour-composite images, whereas normal stars appear with a nearly homogeneous orange colour.

In this way, we identified 8 PN candidates, showing both [OIII] and Hα excesses, and 2 additional objects, showing only an [OIII] excess. All these candidates are located at distances smaller than ~9 kpc from the centre of M 33, i.e. inside the bright optical disc of the galaxy. At distances larger than 9 kpc, no objects with both an [OIII] and Hα emission were found. However, 14 additional sources were detected in those external areas with just an [OIII] excess and lower or negligible emission in the other three filters.

4.2 Colour–colour diagram

Sources in each of the [OIII] images were automatically searched using SExtractor (Bertin & Arnouts 1996), setting the detection threshold to the limit of 2σ over the background. This ensures that very faint sources are recovered, but includes a large number of artefacts. Automatic aperture photometry was then performed via DAOPHOT (Stetson 1987) with an empirically determined optimum aperture of ~5/2 times the stellar FWHMs.

Photometry of ~100 000 stars was obtained and the results were analysed using Hα-r′ versus [OIII] g′ colour–colour diagrams (Fig. 2), which are particularly suited for selecting PNe (see e.g. Corradi et al. 2005).

In this kind of diagram, PNe show up as objects with strong [OIII] and Hα excess compared to the bulk of normal stars, as indicated by the filled circles in Fig. 2, which show the location in the colour–colour diagram of the photometry of the known PNe in the observed fields. All detected sources in this area were visually inspected in the individual images to reject artefacts or poor-photometry sources. This check was also extended to sources with just [OIII] excess. In this way, 4 new PNe candidates were identified, all of which were independently found by our visual search. In addition, 5 of the 14 sources mentioned above, showing just [OIII] excess, were also recovered by the photometry study within relatively low errors.

Some candidates found by visual inspection are not recovered by the photometric search. The main reason is that they are exceedingly faint in the broadband filters. In some other cases, they are lost because of confusion in very crowded areas.

thumbnail Fig. 2

Colour–colour diagram of the sources in the sampled area of M 33.
Open with DEXTER

4.3 Contaminants

The degree of contamination by spurious sources is especially high in the crowded regions of the galaxy and close to spiral arms. This is mostly caused by the presence of giant HII regions and the associated high stellar background. Because of the low detection threshold adopted, spurious PN candidates were also found in less crowded regions, mainly at the faintest magnitudes, owing to large photometric errors. Detector cosmetics, cosmic rays, and transient effects such as asteroids or satellite tracks also contribute to contamination.

In orderto clean the colour–colour diagram from contaminants, we used the following additional information. At the distance of M 33 (840 kpc; Freedman et al. 2001), we do not expect to resolve any PN (Magrini et al. 2000). Therefore every extended source is not considered a PN. Besides, even though PNe on the Milky Way show a significant emission in the IR, it is not expected that PNe at the distance of M 33 would be detected by standard all-sky surveys. Every source with an IR counterpart in the WISE archive is therefore rejected as a PN. Symbiotic stars can mimic PNe in this survey. Indeed, Mikołajewska et al. (2017) discovered 12 symbiotic stars in M 33.

Only one of these stars, M 33 SySt-11, is associated with a faint WISE source, which is only detected in the shorter w1 and w2 bands. The sources showing IR emission (Table 6) are therefore unlikely to be symbiotic stars.

Even after applying these criteria, some dubious sources remain, and we have visually inspected and searched in catalogues and the literature, all candidates that fall in the selected regions of the colour–colour diagram.

5 Results

5.1 New and rejected PN candidates

Eight PN candidates were identified by combining the photometric and visual search. Their coordinates, deprojected distances from the centre of the galaxy, and [OIII]λ5007 Å-to-Hα + [NII] line flux ratios R are shown in Table 4. To compute the deprojected galactocentric distances, the galaxy distance of 840 kpc (Freedman et al. 2001), an intermediate inclination of 53°, and the position angle of 22° are assumed (Makarov et al. 2014). All candidates have an R ratio between the limits 0.3 < R < 3 established by Ciardullo et al. (2002) for PNe within 3 magnitudes from the cut-off of the PNLF. We note that the value of this cut to exclude HII regions decreases at fainter magnitudes (Merrett et al. 2006).

It is important to emphasize that every previously known PN located in our fields were recovered by our search. However, based on our measured colours, we did not confirm some of the candidates in Ciardullo et al. (2004). These are listed in Table 5. Five of these six rejections are shown in the colour–colour diagram of Fig. 2 as filled upward triangles. The sixth unconfirmed candidate shows big photometric errors and is rejected as a possible PN after visual inspection. For the 31 known PNe adopted as the reference sample, the Hα + [NII] measured fluxes (not shown here) are brighter than in the Ciardullo et al. (2004) results. As explained in Ciardullo et al. (2004), when compared with Magrini et al. (2000), this is partly due to the differing contributions of [NII] within the bandpasses of the filters.

Several candidates with apparently good colour data were also rejected after visual inspection. Seven of these candidates are objects previously found by Magrini et al. (2000; filled downward triangles in Fig. 2): five were listed as “possible PNe” by Magrini et al. (2000), which had been previously discarded as PNe by Ciardullo et al. (2004), and two more were catalogued as emission-line objects with non-negligible continuum (Table 6). Additional compact sources with only [OIII] excess are listed in Table 7. Some have an Hα and r′ counterpart, but show no detectable Hα excess. These could be compact galaxies with [OII] λ3727 Å emission redshifted to z ~ 0.35 or Lyα emitters at z ~ 3.1. Another less likely possibility is that these sources are M 33 H-deficient PNe. Further studies of these sources are of interest. The locations of the discovered objects and the previously known PNe are shown in Fig. 3. Finding charts for our PNe candidates (Table 4) are shown in Fig. 5, whereas images of three [OIII] excess sources (Table 7) are shown in Fig. 6. Finally, Fig. 7 shows images at the four bands of a PN and an excess [OIII] source.

Table 4

PNe candidates.

Table 5

PNe misidentified in Ciardullo et al. (2004).

Table 6

Rejected objects classified as “possible PNe” by Magrini et al. (2000).

Table 7

Sources showing a substantial [OIII] excess.

thumbnail Fig. 3

Location of the discovered objects. The yellow filled circles indicate PNe candidates. The yellow filled squares indicate the confirmed PNe and magenta rhombi are candidates with an [OIII] excess. Previous known PNe are shown with cyan small crosses. The total field of view of the image is 3° × 4°. North is up, east at left.
Open with DEXTER
thumbnail Fig. 4

WHT spectra of three new PNe. We note the extremely bright [NII] lines in GCM2.
Open with DEXTER
thumbnail Fig. 5

Finding charts for the PNe candidates (green: [OIII], red: g′). North is up, east at left. Field size is 1′× 1′.
Open with DEXTER
thumbnail Fig. 6

As in Fig. 5 for three sources with [OIII] excess.
Open with DEXTER
thumbnail Fig. 7

Two representative sources imaged at the four filters. North is up, east at the left. Field size is 1′ × 1′ .
Open with DEXTER

5.2 Spectroscopic confirmation of PN candidates

The three brightest candidates were spectroscopically confirmed using ACAM at the WHT. Spectra are shown in Fig. 4. Relative flux calibration was carried out using the standard star Feige 15 (Stone 1977), observed on the night of December 27, 2014.

Emission-line fluxes were measured using the package SPLOT of IRAF. Errors in the fluxes were estimated adding the measured statistical errors quadratically to a constant 5% term taken as representative of systematic errors in the flux calibration. Observed line fluxes were corrected for the effect of the interstellar extinction using the extinction law of Cardelli et al. (1989) with Rν = 3.1. The logarithmic nebular extinction c(Hβ) was derived with the observed-to-theoretical Balmer ratio Hα/H(β) from Osterbrock & Ferland (2006).

Figure 4 shows that all bright emission lines typical of PNe are detected in our low resolution spectra that have [OIII] much brighter than Hα. Also, in the log(Hα/[SII]λλ6717 + 6731) versus log(Hα/[NII]λ6583) diagnostic diagram (Viironen et al. 2007) GCM 1 and 2 can be located near to the region populated by PNe. We note that GCM 1 was previously identified by Magrini et al. (2000) as a possible PN candidate, but rejected by Ciardullo et al. (2004) because of its bright emission in their wide filters; in addition, GCM 2 shows a remarkably high [NII] λ6548 and λ6584 flux relative to Hα, suggesting it is a type I PN.

Given the faintness of the PNe detected lines and limited spectral resolution, no reliable determination of electron temperature (Te) and electron density (Ne) is possible.

5.3 Completeness limit

The completeness limit of our search was estimated by adding artificial stars with various magnitudes in both narrowband and continuum images and then computing the recovery rate of such artificial objects (Minniti & Zijlstra 1997; Magrini et al. 2002, 2003; Corradi et al. 2005). A recovery rate of 50% defines incompleteness.

For [OIII] and Hα, the completeness limit in our observed regions is between 25.5 and 26.0 mag. In the ~0.4 square degree area closer to the bright disc of the galaxy, this completeness limit typically increases by 0.5 magnitudes, owing to the higher background and crowdedness. For g′ and r′ , the completeness limit is at 24.5 mag, becoming almost one magnitude brighter, ~23.5, in that 0.4 square degree area closer to the bright disc of M 33.

5.4 PN population size and luminosity of the external regions of M 33

The luminosity of a stellar population that produces PNe can be determined using the α ratio, i.e. the luminosity-specific PN number density (Jacoby 1980). This quantity links the PNe population size with the bolometric luminosity of the parent stellar population. Buzzoni et al. (2006) discusses the method in detail and provides recipes to determine α as a function of the age and metallicity (colour) of the host galaxy.

Based on the simple stellar population models by Renzini & Buzzoni (1986), the number of PNe related to its progenitor stellar population can be expressed in terms of the PN visibility lifetimes (τPN) as follows: (2)

where B is the specific evolutionary flux (stars yr−1 ), that is only weakly dependent on the metallicity (except at very low metallicities).

Given that no PN candidates are found outside the bright M 33 disc down to the completeness limit of our survey, we can estimate an upper limit to the total stellar luminosity at the outer regions that we have imaged. For that, we adopt a standard shape for the PNLF and a completeness limit of 25.5 mag, which corresponds to 5 magnitudes below the bright cut-off of the PNLF assuming an absolute magnitude cut-off of M* = −4.47 (Ciardullo et al. 2002) at the distance of M 33 (Ciardullo et al. 2004). Also, we assume that the faintest detectable PNe are about 8 magnitudes below the bright cut-off m* of the PNLF (Buzzoni et al. 2006).

From previous deep studies of M 33 we know that the colour of the external regions is , corresponding to logα ≈−6.8 (Buzzoni et al. 2006). With all these figures, we infer an upper limit for the luminosity of the observed 4.5 square degree region of ~1.6 × 107 L⊙.

This agrees with a recent deep study of the red giant branch (RGB) population in M 33, setting a limit to the luminosity of a possible halo to <1.6 × 107 L⊙ (McMonigal et al. 2016) but leaving open the alternative existence of a very extended and faint thick disc (Barker et al. 2011; Cockcroft et al. 2013). This value is smaller than, but roughly compatible with, the luminosity of the 40 square degrees substructure surrounding M 33 ( ~1.9 × 107 L⊙) measured by McConnachie et al. (2009) based also on the study of their RGB population. In the past, several works have claimed the detection of a halo in M 33. Studies of RR Lyrae stars suggested the existence of this halo (Sarajedini et al. 2006; Yang et al. 2010); subsequent works using metallicity indicators have also suggested its existence (Pritzl et al. 2011). Globular clusters (Chandar et al. 2002) and AGB and RGB population studies (e.g Barker et al. 2007a,b; Ibata et al. 2007 or Cioni et al. 2008) also claimed tentative detections of the halo. However, the present work and that from McMonigal et al. (2016) have failed to measure any bright stellar component in the external regions of the galaxy, excluding the existence of a massive classical monolithic halo.

6 Summary and conclusions

Planetary nebulae are known to be excellent tracers of stellar populations even in very low surface brightness regions. Taking advantage of this property, we have carried out the first deep search for PNe in the outerregions of M 33 to gain further insights into the existence of a classical halo or, as in the case of M 31, of a rich system of extended substructures possibly related to past interactions between the two galaxies.

The lack of reliable PN candidates in the observed external regions of M 33, and down to the completeness limit of our search of 25.5 mag in [OIII] and Hα, poses an upper limit to the luminosity of any stellar population in this area of Loutskirts, PNe < 1.6 × 107 L⊙ (MV ~−12.45). It can therefore be concluded that there is no evidence of prominent extended structures outside its bright disc, and particularly, of a massiveclassical halo, in line with results obtained using other stellar tracers.

The difference with M 31, which instead displays a very rich circumgalactic environment populated by bright PNe, is therefore substantial, and goes against the idea of a strong tidal interaction in a past encounter of the two galaxies (Patel et al. 2017).

Table 8

Observed and dereddened fluxes.

Acknowledgements

We deeply appreciate discussion with Bruce Balick and Karen Kwitter, which led to the development of this work. We thank Robert Greimel for the first treatment of the images. R.G.-R. thanks José Antonio Acosta Pulido for the encouragement to apply for the observing time of the E2 source and Ismael Pérez Fournón for his help with the analysis of the quasar’s spectra. We thank Laura Magrini, the referee of this paper, for the detailed revision and suggestions that helped to significantly improve the article. The work was supported by the Spanish project AYA2012-35330.

Appendix A Spectra of a type II QSO candidate

A 3 × 2400 s spectrum of the [OIII] excess source E2 in Table 5 was taken on August 14 and September 2, 2017 with the same set-up as described in Sect. 2. The standard star HD 19445 (Oke & Gunn 1983) was used for flux calibration. The spectrum is shown in Fig. A.1. Despite the faintness of the source, the characteristic lines of a typical active galactic nucleus (AGN; Hainline et al. 2011), at redshift z ~ 3.12, are recognized. The rest frame and observed wavelength, corresponding ion, and measured flux are tabulated in Table A.1. The FWHM of the critical Lyα and CIV lines are included. Type II AGNs are usually identified by their narrow emission lines (FWHM < 2000 km s−1) and sources as faint as this object are barely detected (Alexandroff et al. 2013).

thumbnail Fig. A.1

Spectrum of the [OIII] excess source E2, a type II QSO candidate.
Open with DEXTER
Table A.1

Emission and absorption detected features.

References

  1. Ahn, C. P., Alexandroff, R., Allende Prieto, C., et al. 2012, ApJS, 203, 21 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexandroff, R., Strauss, M. A., Greene, J. E., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 3306 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Annibali, F., Tosi, M., Romano, D., et al. 2017, ApJ, 843, 20 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arnaboldi, M. 2012, in IAU Symp., 283, 267 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  5. Arnaboldi, M., Longobardi, A., & Gerhard, O. 2016, in The General Assembly of Galaxy Halos: Structure, Origin and Evolution, eds. A. Bragaglia, M. Arnaboldi, M. Rejkuba, & D. Romano, IAU Symp., 317, 69 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  6. Badenes, C., Maoz, D., & Ciardullo, R. 2015, ApJ, 804, L25 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barker, M. K., Sarajedini, A., Geisler, D., Harding, P., & Schommer, R. 2007a, AJ, 133, 1125 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barker, M. K., Sarajedini, A., Geisler, D., Harding, P., & Schommer, R. 2007b, AJ, 133, 1138 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Barker, M. K., Ferguson, A. M. N., Cole, A. A., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 410, 504 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bernard, E. J., Ferguson, A. M. N., & Barker, M. K. 2012, in Galactic Archaeology: Near-Field Cosmology and the Formation of the Milky Way, eds. W. Aoki, M. Ishigaki, T. Suda, T. Tsujimoto, & N. Arimoto, ASP Conf. Ser., 458, 315 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bertin, E. 2006, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XV, eds. C. Gabriel, C. Arviset, D. Ponz, & S. Enrique, ASP Conf. Ser., 351, 112 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bertin, E., & Arnouts, S. 1996, A&AS, 117, 393 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bresolin, F., Ryan-Weber, E., Kennicutt, R. C., & Goddard, Q. 2009, ApJ, 695, 580 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Buzzoni, A., Arnaboldi, M., & Corradi, R. L. M. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 877 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chandar, R., Bianchi, L., Ford, H. C., & Sarajedini, A. 2002, ApJ, 564, 712 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ciardullo, R. 2013, in Advancing the Physics of Cosmic Distances, ed. R. de Grijs, IAU Symp., 289, 247 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ciardullo, R., Feldmeier, J. J., Jacoby, G. H., et al. 2002, ApJ, 577, 31 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ciardullo, R., Durrell, P. R., Laychak, M. B., et al. 2004, ApJ, 614, 167 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cioni, M.-R. L., Irwin, M., Ferguson, A. M. N., et al. 2008, A&A, 487, 131 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cockcroft, R., McConnachie, A. W., Harris, W. E., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 428, 1248 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Corradi, R. L. M., Magrini, L., Greimel, R., et al. 2005, A&A, 431, 555 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  23. Corradi, R. L. M., Kwitter, K. B., Balick, B., Henry, R. B. C., & Hensley, K. 2015, ApJ, 807, 181 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Drew, J. E., Greimel, R., Irwin, M. J., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 753 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ferguson, A., Irwin, M., Chapman, S., et al. 2007, Astrophys. Space Sci. Proc., 3, 239 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Gibson, B. K., et al. 2001, ApJ, 553, 47 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gerhard, O., Arnaboldi, M., Freeman, K. C., et al. 2007, A&A, 468, 815 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hainline, K. N., Shapley, A. E., Greene, J. E., & Steidel, C. C. 2011, ApJ, 733, 31 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hodge, P. W., Balsley, J., Wyder, T. K., & Skelton, B. P. 1999, VizieR Online Data Catalog: J/PASP/111/685 [Google Scholar]
  30. Ibata, R., Martin, N. F., Irwin, M., et al. 2007, ApJ, 671, 1591 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Irwin, M., & Lewis, J. 2001, New Astron. Rev., 45, 105 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jacoby, G. H. 1980, ApJS, 42, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jacoby, G. H. 1989, ApJ, 339, 39 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Longobardi, A., Arnaboldi, M., Gerhard, O., & Hanuschik, R. 2015, A&A, 579, A135 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  35. Magrini, L., & Gonçalves, D. R. 2009, MNRAS, 398, 280 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Magrini, L., Corradi, R. L. M., Mampaso, A., & Perinotto, M. 2000, A&A, 355, 713 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  37. Magrini, L., Corradi, R. L. M., Walton, N. A., et al. 2002, A&A, 386, 869 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  38. Magrini, L., Corradi, R. L. M., Greimel, R., et al. 2003, A&A, 407, 51 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  39. Magrini, L., Stanghellini, L., & Villaver, E. 2009, ApJ, 696, 729 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Magrini, L., Coccato, L., Stanghellini, L., Casasola, V., & Galli, D. 2016, A&A, 588, A91 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  41. Makarov, D., Prugniel, P., Terekhova, N., Courtois, H., & Vauglin, I. 2014, A&A, 570, A13 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  42. Marmo, C., & Bertin, E. 2008, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVII, eds. R. W. Argyle, P. S. Bunclark, & J. R. Lewis, ASP Conf. Ser., 394, 619 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  43. McConnachie, A. W., Irwin, M. J., Ibata, R. A., et al. 2009, Nature, 461, 66 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. McConnachie, A. W., Ferguson, A. M. N., Irwin, M. J., et al. 2010, ApJ, 723, 1038 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. McMonigal, B., Lewis, G. F., Brewer, B. J., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 4374 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Merrett,H. R., Merrifield, M. R., Douglas, N. G., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 369, 120 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Mikołajewska, J., Shara, M. M., Caldwell, N., Iłkiewicz, K., & Zurek, D. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 1699 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Minniti, D., & Zijlstra, A. A. 1997, AJ, 114, 147 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Oke, J. B., & Gunn, J. E. 1983, ApJ, 266, 713 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Osterbrock, D. E., & Ferland, G. J. 2006, Astrophysics of Gaseous Nebulae and Active Galactic Nuclei (CA: University Science Books) [Google Scholar]
  51. Patel, E., Besla, G., & Sohn, S. T. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 3825 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Pritzl, B. J., Olszewski, E. W., Saha, A., Venn, K. A., & Skillman, E. D. 2011, AJ, 142, 198 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Renzini, A., & Buzzoni, A. 1986, in Spectral Evolution of Galaxies, eds. C. Chiosi, & A. Renzini, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, 122, 195–231 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Rogstad, D. H., Wright, M. C. H., & Lockhart, I. A. 1976, ApJ, 204, 703 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sarajedini, A., Barker, M. K., Geisler, D., Harding, P., & Schommer, R. 2006, AJ, 132, 1361 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Schönberner, D., Jacob, R., Steffen, M., & Sandin, C. 2007, A&A, 473, 467 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  57. Stetson, P. B. 1987, PASP, 99, 191 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Stone, R. P. S. 1977, ApJ, 218, 767 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. van Dokkum, P. G. 2001, PASP, 113, 1420 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. Viironen, K., Delgado-Inglada, G., Mampaso, A., Magrini, L., & Corradi, R. L. M. 2007, MNRAS, 381, 1719 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. Wang, F., Wu, X.-B., Fan, X., et al. 2016, ApJ, 819, 24 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. Wyder, T. K., Hodge, P. W., & Skelton, B. P. 1997, PASP, 109, 927 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. Yang, S.-C., Sarajedini, A., Holtzman, J. A., & Garnett, D. R. 2010, ApJ, 724, 799 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
1

IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc. (AURA) under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundations.

All Tables

Table 1

INT imaging.

In the text
Table 2

WHT spectroscopy.

In the text
Table 3

Known PNe used for the [OIII] calibration.

In the text
Table 4

PNe candidates.

In the text
Table 5

PNe misidentified in Ciardullo et al. (2004).

In the text
Table 6

Rejected objects classified as “possible PNe” by Magrini et al. (2000).

In the text
Table 7

Sources showing a substantial [OIII] excess.

In the text
Table 8

Observed and dereddened fluxes.

In the text
Table A.1

Emission and absorption detected features.

In the text

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

M 33 observed fields. The total field of view of the image is 3° × 4°. North is up, east at left.
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

Colour–colour diagram of the sources in the sampled area of M 33.
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

Location of the discovered objects. The yellow filled circles indicate PNe candidates. The yellow filled squares indicate the confirmed PNe and magenta rhombi are candidates with an [OIII] excess. Previous known PNe are shown with cyan small crosses. The total field of view of the image is 3° × 4°. North is up, east at left.
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

WHT spectra of three new PNe. We note the extremely bright [NII] lines in GCM2.
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5

Finding charts for the PNe candidates (green: [OIII], red: g′). North is up, east at left. Field size is 1′× 1′.
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 6

As in Fig. 5 for three sources with [OIII] excess.
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 7

Two representative sources imaged at the four filters. North is up, east at the left. Field size is 1′ × 1′ .
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. A.1

Spectrum of the [OIII] excess source E2, a type II QSO candidate.
Open with DEXTER
In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.