Table 2
Comparison between the different methods of estimating Γ0 found in literature.
Model | k |
![]() |
|
s = 0 | s = 2 | ||
|
|||
SP99 |
![]() |
0.852 | 0.772 |
M07 |
![]() |
1.702 | 1.543 |
G10 |
![]() |
0.507 | 0.649 |
G12 |
![]() |
0.687 | 0.669 |
N13 |
![]() |
1 | 1 |
N14 |
![]() |
0.971 | 0.946 |
Notes. k is a dimensionless factor that varies according to the different models and the power law index of the external medium density profile s (see Eq. (15)). The values of Γ0 are numerically compared with the one obtained by Nava et al. (2013), in the case of homogeneous medium (s = 0) and wind medium (s = 2). We chose to compare the result of G10 using the published formula with the parameter a = 4−s as prescribed by the Blandford & McKee (1976) dynamics. SP99: Sari & Piran (1999); M07: Molinari et al. (2007); G10: Ghisellini et al. (2010); G12: Ghirlanda et al. (2012); N13: Nava et al. (2013); N14: Nappo et al. (2014).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.