Table B.1
Best-fit parameters for Ks wide-field image, under different circumstances that may affect systematics.
| Σ0 | Γ | Σ0 |
|
|
| (mJy arcsec-2) | ||||
|
|
||||
| 1 | 14.3 | 0.32 | 0.057 | 0.3 |
| 2 | 22.6 | 0.33 | 0.045 | 1.0 |
| 3 | 15.7 | 0.31 | 0.057 | 0.5 |
| 4 | 20.5 | 0.24 | 0.062 | 0.3 |
| 5 | 26.8 | 0.25 | 0.058 | 0.1 |
| 6 | 21.7 | 0.23 | 0.057 | 0.4 |
| 7 | 20.7 | 0.27 | 0.062 | 0.5 |
| 8 | 21.4 | 0.28 | 0.054 | 2.5 |
Notes. We note that all the formal uncertainties of the best-fit parameters are ≤1%, with the exception of row 8, which has significantly larger formal uncertainties due to the large reduced χ2. The χ2 listed here are smaller than the ones listed in Table 1 because the fitting range is different here (R ≤ 0.5 pc compared to R ≤ 1 pc in the main body of the paper; see discussion on the change of the projected power-law in Appendices B.6 and 4.4). Therefore they are not listed in this table, which serves to explore systematic uncertainties, which dominate the error budget.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.