Table 2
Derived mass loss from optical studies and estimates, from different prescriptions, of the hot mass loss derived with our X-ray data.
Target name | log (Ṁliterature) | log (ṀVink + 01) | EM | log (ṀHuenemoerder + 12) | log (ṀCohen + 08) | ||||||||
(M⊙ yr-1) | (M⊙ yr-1) | (1052 cm-3) | (M⊙ yr-1) | (M⊙ yr-1) | |||||||||
Low Teff | High Teff | ||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
HD 34816 | −8.50 ± 0.06 | 74.1 ± 4.2 | <–8.1 to <–7.6 | <–8.0 to <–7.6 | |||||||||
HD 35468 | −8.33 ± 0.09 | 2.20 ± 0.07 | –10.0 to –8.4a | –9.3 to –8.4a | |||||||||
HD 36512 | −6.22 ± 0.06 | 2466 ± 344 | <–7.2 to <–6.7 | <–7.1 to <–6.6 | |||||||||
HD 36960 | −7.79 ± 0.07 | 159 ± 23 | <–7.8 to <–7.3 | <–7.8 to <–7.3 | |||||||||
HD 38771 | −6.05 [1], ![]() |
−6.80 ± 0.08 | −8.01 ± 0.07 | 252 ± 21 | –7.7 to –7.2 | –7.6 to –7.2 | |||||||
HD 44743 | −7.33 ± 0.08 | −8.55 ± 0.08 | 26.1 ± 0.8 | <–8.6 to <–8.2 | <–8.5 to <–8.0 | ||||||||
HD 52089 | −9 [3],−8 [4] | −7.53 ± 0.08 | 28.9 ± 0.8 | –8.3 to –7.8 | –8.3 to –7.8 | ||||||||
HD 63922 | −6.93 ± 0.06 | 460 ± 16 | <–7.6 to <–7.1 | <–7.6 to <–7.1 | |||||||||
HD 79351 | −8.71 ± 0.10 | 25.9 ± 0.6 | –9.5 to –7.9 a | –8.7 to –7.8a | |||||||||
HD 144217 | −8.04 ± 0.06 | 59.1 ± 2.3 | <–8.1 to <–7.7 | <–8.1 to <–7.6 | |||||||||
HD 158926 | −6.50 ± 0.08 | 19.8 ± 1.5 | –8.2 to –7.7 | –8.1 to –7.7 |
Notes. The second column lists the mass-loss rate value derived in recent optical studies using atmosphere models: [1]: Crowther et al. (2006), [2]: Searle et al. (2008), [3]: Hamann et al. (priv. comm.; Fossati et al. 2015), [4]: Najarro et al. (1996). The third and fourth columns provide the mass-loss estimates from the formulae of Vink et al. (2001) when the adopted Teff is in the range 12 500−22 500 K (cool side of the bi-stability jump) and 27 500−50 000 K (hot side of the bi-stability jump), respectively. When the adopted Teff (Table A.1) is in the range 22 500−27 500 K (in the bi-stability jump), mass-loss estimates for both the cool and hot sides of the bi-stability jump are provided. The fifth column yields the total X-ray emission measures, estimated from the normalisation factors of the spectral fittings (Table 1). The last two columns provide the mass-loss rates predicted by Eq. (1) of Huenemoerder et al. (2012, with b = 0.97 and the formula on p. 1868 of Cohen et al. (2008), respectively. In these columns only a range of mass-loss rates are given: the lower values correspond to a terminal wind velocity of 500 km s-1, while the highest values correspond to a terminal wind velocity of 1500 km s-1.
These values were derived assuming Rfir = 1 to 7 R⋆, which is in line with the formation radii derived in Sect. 3.1.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.