Free Access

Table 1

Strong Mg ii absorber searches in the literature.

Reference Nobj NMg ii Δz z Excess/SDSS Excess/high-res

Low-redshift absorbers (zMg ii< 2.3)
Prochter et al. (2006b) 14 14 15.5 1.1 3.8
Sudilovsky et al. (2007) 5 6 6.75 1.3 4
Tejos et al. (2009) 8 9 10.86 1.34
Bergeron et al. (2011; blazars) 45 13 29.93 0.82
Vergani et al. (2009; high res.) 10 9 13.94 1.11 2
Vergani et al. (2009; high+low res.) 26 22 31.55 1.3 2.1 ± 0.6
Cucchiara et al. (2013; high res.) 18 13 20.3 1.1 2.6 ± 0.8
Cucchiara et al. (2013; high+low res.) 95 20 55.5 1.15 1.5 ± 0.4
This work (GRBs from XSGRB) 81 18 44.71 1.22 1.48 ± 0.35 1.11 ± 0.28
This work (quasars) 100 52 110.5 1.74 1.37 ± 0.19 1.02 ± 0.18

High redshift absorbers (zMg ii> 2.3)
This work (GRBs from XSGRB) 81 5 13.14 3.28 0.71 ± 0.34
This work (quasars) 100 45 143.9 3.04 0.56 ± 0.93

Notes. Nobj lists the GRB or quasar sample sizes, and NMg ii is the number of detected absorbers within the total redshift path length, Δz, with an average redshift, z. The penultimate column lists the reported excess of absorbers relative to the expectation from SDSS quasar absorber statistics. One exception is that Bergeron et al. (2011) analysed blazars rather than GRBs. Vergani et al. (2009) and Cucchiara et al. (2013) reported statistics from high-spectral-resolution data, as well as combined high- and low-spectral-resolution data. It should be noted that there are substantial overlaps of the target selections amongst the references, and the reported overdensities are therefore correlated. To compare our searches with the literature, we report statistics from absorbers at different redshift ranges: z< 2.3 and z> 2.3 (Sect. 3.2). The last column reports overdensities relative to high-spectral-resolution quasar studies by Mathes et al. (2017) for the low-redshift sample, and Chen et al. (2016) for the high-redshift sample.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.