Free Access
Table 3
Comparison of the best-fit obliquity distributions with the known spin axes from the EARN and DAMIT databases.
| cosγ< −1/3 | | cosγ | ≤ 1/3 | cosγ> 1/3 | |
|
|
|||
| EARN [Any H, 43 objects] | (67 ± 7)% | (14 ± 5)% | (19 ± 6)% |
| EARN [H ≤ 18, 30 objects] | (70 ± 9)% | (17 ± 7)% | (13 ± 6)% |
| EARN [H> 18, 13 objects] | (61 ± 14)% | (8 ± 8)% | (31 ± 13)% |
| 3-bin | (63 ± 1)% | (4 ± 2)% |
|
| 4-bin | 61% | 13% | 26% |
| PL |
|
|
|
| PLMP | 54% | 14% | 32% |
| Quadratic |
|
|
(30 ± 4)% |
Notes. The error bars are 1σ. For the models with three independent parameters we do not have error bars as the best-fit solution was found with the IDEA global optimizer.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.