Free Access

Table 3

Comparison of the expected dispersion (“Exp.”) and observed (“Obs.”) parameter shifts between pairs of datasets.

(2,800) vs. (2,2500) (30,800) vs. (30,2500) (30,800) vs. (30,2500), fixlens



Parameters Exp. Obs. |Obs./Exp.| Exp. Obs. |Obs./Exp.| Exp. Obs. |Obs./Exp.|
[σ] [σ] [σ] [σ] [σ] [σ]

ωb ............... 0.8 0.9 1.1 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.8 −0.5 0.6
ωm ............... 0.8 −1.6 2.0 0.8 −0.7 0.9 0.7 −0.3 0.4
θMC ............... 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.9 0.2 0.2
τ ............... 0.4 −1.0 1.7 0.4 −0.7 1.9 0.2 −0.0 0.2
ln(1010As) ............... 0.4 −1.0 2.4 0.4 −1.0 2.2 0.1 −0.2 1.7
ns ............... 0.8 1.0 1.2 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.9 −0.5 0.5
H0 ............... 0.8 1.4 1.8 0.8 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.1 0.1
As e− 2τ ............... 0.7 −1.5 2.2 0.7 −0.9 1.3 0.6 −0.7 1.1

Notes. We show results for the case where we use all the lowest multipoles, where we excise the < 30 multipoles, and where we also fix the lensing potential, as described in Sect. 5.2. The shifts are shown in units of standard deviation of the respective < 800 runs for each case. The ratio between observed shifts and expected dispersions becomes smaller when excising the < 30 multipoles, and even more when factoring out the impact of lensing. Note the final column has expected shifts calculated as in Eq. (53) of Planck Collaboration XI (2016) rather than using simulations (which would have been more complicated in practice to perform for this case).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.