Free Access

Fig. 1

image

Relative differences between our diameters (upper panel) and visible geometric albedos (lower panel) and those reported in Nugent et al. (2015, 2016). We used the same default value of beaming parameter and 4.6-μm albedos that they used. The curves are Gaussian functions with the same mean values but different standard deviations. Our diameters are 3% higher on average and our albedos 3% lower.

This figure is made of several images, please see below:

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.