Free Access

Table A.1

Sample properties.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]

Target SED class SpTa T a Agec Sep. (pair)g
[–] [–] [–] [K] [10-8M yr-1] [L] [L] [L] [Myr] [M] [arcsec]

Outflows

AA Tau II M0.6 3770 2.51 0.74 1.240 0.21 2.7 0.01 ...
CW Tau II K3 4470 5.27 1.35 2.844 1.01 5.8 0.002 ...
DF Tau II M2.7 3450 10.05 1.60 ... 0.22 0.1 0.0004 0.09 (A–B)
DG Tau II K7 4020 25.25 0.90 ... 1.26 0.6 0.02 ...
DG Tau B I M?b <4000 ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
DL Tau II K5.5 4190 2.48 0.70 ... 0.24 2.9 0.09 ...
DO Tau II M0.3 3830 3.12 1.20 ... 0.17 0.6 0.007 ...
DP Tau II M0.8 3730 0.04 0.41 ... 0.01 2.6 <0.0005 ...
DQ Tau II M0.6 3770 0.59 ... ... 0.03 ... 0.02 ...
FS Tau II/Flat M2.4 3510 ... 0.32 3.224 ... 2.8 0.002 0.23 (A–B)
GG Tau II K7.5(A)+M5.8(B) 3930(A)+2890(B) 7.95 0.84(A)+0.71(B) ... 0.41 2.3(A)+1.5(B) 0.2 0.25 (Aa–Ab)
Haro 6–5 B I M4 3340c ... 0.02 17.551 ... ... ... 0.23 (A–B)
Haro 6–13 II M1.6(E)+K5.5(W) 3670(E)+4190(W) ... 1.30 0.799 ... ... 0.01 ...
HL Tau I K3 4470 0.35 6.60 3.838 0.05 0.1 ... ...
HN Tau II K3(A)+M4.8(B) 4470(A)+3050(B) 0.49 0.70 ... 0.11 22.0 0.0008 3.11 (A–B)
HV Tau I? M4.1 3120 ... 1.23 ... ... 0.3 0.002 3.98 (A–C)
IRAS 04158+2805 I M3 3470c ... 0.41 0.882 ... 0.9 ... ...
IRAS 04358+2550 II M0 3850c ... 0.36 0.401 ... ... ... ...
RW Aur II K0(A)+K6.5(B) 5110(A)+4160(B) ... 3.20 ... ... 2.8 0.004 1.42 (A–B)
RY Tau T? G0 5930 78.18 7.60 5.520 10.21 1.8 0.02 ...
SU Aur II G4 5560 18.03 12.90 9.464 3.17 2.6 0.0009 ...
T Tau II/I K0 5250c 23.62 15.50 8.048 3.89 1.2 0.008 0.70 (A–B)
UY Aur II K7 4020 6.74 3.10 ... 0.43 0.8 0.002 0.88 (A–B)
UZ Tau II M1.9+M3.1 3560(A)+3410(B) 0.45 1.60(A)+0.52(B) 0.890 0.02 0.2(A)+0.6(B) 0.02 3.54 (A–Ba)
V773 Tau II K4 4460 11.95 2.31 9.488 1.03 4.1 0.0005 0.06 (A–B)
XZ Tau II M3.2 3370 0.71 3.90 0.962 0.02 0.6 ... 0.30 (A–B)

Non-outflows

BP Tau II M0.5 3510 2.80 0.96 1.365 0.22 1.8 0.02 ...
CIDA 2 III M5.5 3200c ... 0.29 0.178 ... 0.5 <0.0007 ...
CI Tau II K5.5 4190 12.35 0.87 0.195 2.53 2.1 0.03 ...
Coku Tau/4 II M1.1 3690 ... 0.39 ... ... 3.0 0.0005 ...
CX Tau T M2.5 3580 0.04 0.41 ... 0.002 1.3 0.001 ...
CY Tau II M2.3 3515 0.18 0.47 1.94 0.01 1.8 0.006 ...
DE Tau II M2.3 3515 1.32 0.81 ... 0.06 0.4 0.005 ...

Notes. [1] Sample targets; [2] SED Class; [3] spectral type; [4] temperature; [5] accretion rate; [6] stellar luminosities; [7] X-ray luminosities; [8] accretion luminosities; [9] stellar age; [10] disc masses; [11] Separation in arcsec and components. The mass accretion rates were derived from the U band excess as follows: first the U band photometry from Kenyon & Hartmann (1995) was derredened using the Cardelli et al. (1989) extinction curve. Then the U band excess was derived by subtracting the photospheric contribution, and converted to accretion luminosity according to the empirical relation log (Lacc/L) = 1.09 × log (LU/L) + 0.98 in Gullbring et al. (1998). The mass accretion rates were finally obtained using the relation , following the assumptions in Gullbring et al. (1998).

Reference. aHerczeg & Hillenbrand (2014), b see Howard et al. (2013) for a discussion, cPalla & Stahler (2002), dacc and Lacc as explained above, eGüdel et al. (2007b), fAndrews & Williams (2005), gWhite & Ghez (2001).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.