| Issue |
A&A
Volume 601, May 2017
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | C1 | |
| Number of page(s) | 1 | |
| Section | Catalogs and data | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629235e | |
| Published online | 04 May 2017 | |
Gaia Data Release 1 (Corrigendum)
Principles of the photometric calibration of the G band
1 Institut de Ciències del Cosmos, Universitat de Barcelona (IEEC-UB), Martí Franquès 1, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
e-mail: carrasco@fqa.ub.edu
2 Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK
3 INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna, via Ranzani 1, 40127 Bologna, Italy
4 INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, via Frascati 33, 00040 Monte Porzio Catone (Roma), Italy
5 INAF–Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Largo Enrico Fermi 5, 50125 Firenze, Italy
6 Sterrewacht Leiden, Leiden University, PO Box 9513, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
7 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Notre Dame University-Louaize, PO Box 72, Zouk Mikaël, Lebanon
8 ASI Science Data Center, via del Politecnico SNC, 00133 Roma, Italy
Key words: instrumentation: photometers / space vehicles: instruments / techniques: photometric / surveys / Galaxy: general / errata, addenda
This paper provides two corrections to the original paper that were due to typographical mistakes. These modifications do not affect the results included in the paper. In our study we used the correct equations and these typographical errors were introduced only while writing the document.
1. First correction
The zero point term in the across-scan (AC) dependency (j = 0) in Eq. (2) of the original paper (large scale, LS, calibration model) need to be deleted. Actually, the small scale (SS) term (Eq. (3) in the original document) already accounts for this zero point. Thus, the correct expression for Eq. (2) is the following: 
(1)This change affects Table 4 listing the number of coefficients in the model. The new table is now Table 1 in this document.
2. Second correction
Equations (6) and (7) in the original document need corrections. The correct Eq. (6) (weighted mean flux) is: 
(2)and the correct Eq. (7) (error on weighted mean flux) is: 
(3)
Number of coefficients used in Gaia DR1 for a given calibration unit (l or l′).
Acknowledgments
We thank Alessandro Spagna for spotting these typographical errors.
© ESO, 2017
All Tables
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.