Free Access
This article is an erratum for:

Volume 601, May 2017
Article Number C1
Number of page(s) 1
Section Catalogs and data
Published online 04 May 2017

This paper provides two corrections to the original paper that were due to typographical mistakes. These modifications do not affect the results included in the paper. In our study we used the correct equations and these typographical errors were introduced only while writing the document.

1. First correction

The zero point term in the across-scan (AC) dependency (j = 0) in Eq. (2) of the original paper (large scale, LS, calibration model) need to be deleted. Actually, the small scale (SS) term (Eq. (3) in the original document) already accounts for this zero point. Thus, the correct expression for Eq. (2) is the following: (1)This change affects Table 4 listing the number of coefficients in the model. The new table is now Table 1 in this document.

2. Second correction

Equations (6) and (7) in the original document need corrections. The correct Eq. (6) (weighted mean flux) is: (2)and the correct Eq. (7) (error on weighted mean flux) is: (3)

Table 1

Number of coefficients used in Gaia DR1 for a given calibration unit (l or l).


We thank Alessandro Spagna for spotting these typographical errors.

© ESO, 2017

All Tables

Table 1

Number of coefficients used in Gaia DR1 for a given calibration unit (l or l).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.