Table 4
Metallicity estimates for NGC 6528 using different samples.
S/N | Nstars | ⟨[Fe/H]⟩ | σ | Error | |
|
|||||
All | 21 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.02 | |
>35 | 13 | –0.03 | 0.08 | 0.02 | |
Recalibrated | >35 | 13 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.02 |
|
|||||
|
|||||
Method 2 | All | 8 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.03 |
>35 | 3 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.03 | |
Modified Method 2 | All | 13 | –0.04 | 0.09 | 0.02 |
>35 | 10 | –0.05 | 0.08 | 0.02 |
Notes. The two first lines in the table gibes the results using Method 2 and Modified Method 2 together to analyse the whole sample. The line marked recalibrated presents our final result. Below this, we give the results if the sample is split according to which method is used to analyse the spectra. Column 1 indicates which methods are included in the average, Col. 2 indicates if all S/N are included or if there is a cut-off, Col. 3 gives the number of stars in the sample, Col. 4 lists the average [Fe/H], while Cols. 5 and 6 list the associated σ and error-in-the-mean ().
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.