Free Access

Fig. 11


Comparison between the observed NIFS velocity dispersion map and three representative Schwarzschild models, all at the same M/L = 1.80 and with different black hole masses. From left to right: the data, the formal best fit MBH (using LOESS) model, a model with MBH a factor of five higher than the previous one (70% higher than the derived upper limit), and the model with MBH for which the sphere of influence is the same as our spatial resolution. The MBH values are given above the maps. Note the appearance of the central velocity dispersion peak for models above the formal upper limit. The same comparison is given for the JAM Vrms models in the lower panels.

This figure is made of several images, please see below:

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.