The (w)hole survey: An unbiased sample study of transition disk candidates based on Spitzer catalogs

Free Access

Table A.3

Results of disk fitting procedure and classification.

ID	Name	r _cav	Σ_c	M _disk,fit ^a	δ _dust	h _c	ψ	M _disk,mm ^a	L_disk/L_∗	Classification^b
		(AU)	(g cm^-2)	(M_Jup)				(M_Jup)

1	TCha	140	7E-02	7.8	1E-02	0.10	1/7.	3.7	0.467	ML
2	RECX11	6	3E-03	1.1	1E-02	0.01	1/7.	< 1.5	0.067	LS
3	RECX5	10	3E-04	0.1	1E-04	0.01	1/7.	-	0.038	LL
4	CHXR22E	45	3E-04	0.1	1E-06	0.01	2/7.	-	0.178	LL
5	ISO52	30	3E-03	0.9	1E-01	0.05	2/7.	-	0.195	LL
...

Notes. The full table is available at the CDS.

^(*)

Fit results are uncertain owing to unknown spectral type.

^(a)

Disk masses refer to the full disk mass that is computed assuming a gas-to-dust ratio of 100.

^(b)

NH = disks without holes, ML = massive disks with large holes, MS = massive disks with small holes, LL = low-mass disks with large holes, LS = low-mass disks with small holes, and DD = low-mass disks with very low scale heights. See also definition in the text.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.