Free Access

Table 6

Comparison between different evaluations of the acoustic radius.

Target Δνrecalc. R /R
(in μHz) (in s) (in s)

Aardvark 144.698 ± 0.009 3455.5 ± 0.2 3370.5 1.0006128
Blofeld 94.271 ± 0.008 5303.9 ± 0.5 5106.8 1.0000000
Coco 162.474 ± 0.013 3077.4 ± 0.2 2998.7 1.0007149
Diva 96.023 ± 0.009 5207.1 ± 0.5 5082.4 1.0007380
Elvis 120.231 ± 0.009 4158.6 ± 0.3 4045.3 1.0007033
Felix 69.559 ± 0.015 7188.2 ± 1.5 7014.1 1.0009181
George 70.466 ± 0.022 7095.6 ± 2.2 6930.2 1.0009409
Henry 116.698 ± 0.022 4284.6 ± 0.8 4199.0 1.0008149
Izzy 116.095 ± 0.022 4306.8 ± 0.8 4219.4 1.0007725
Jam 86.605 ± 0.034 5773.3 ± 2.2 5666.2 1.0008475

Notes. The smallest difference between τTot. and is 78.6 s for Coco, whereas the largest difference is 197.1 s for Blofeld. The last column gives R, the upper integration bound used when calculating τTot.. This radius corresponded an optical depth of τopt. = 10-3 (the last mesh point in the stellar targets), except for Blofeld where the atmosphere was truncated at the photospheric radius.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.