Table 3
Best-fitting parameters for the LT relation while varying some assumptions in the model.
| Relation | Fit | Assumption | ALT | BLT | γLT | σLT | Ndet |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) |
|
|
|||||||
| LXXL-T | XXL | x500 = 0.1 | 0.63 ± 0.10 | 2.58 ± 0.17 | 1.58 ± 0.85 | 0.48 ± 0.08 | 117 |
| LXXL-T | XXL | x500 = 0.2 | 0.81 ± 0.13 | 2.66 ± 0.15 | 1.63 ± 0.75 | 0.45 ± 0.07 | 115 |
| LXXL-T | XXL | MT† | 0.66 ± 0.09 | 2.47 ± 0.14 | 2.09 ± 0.65 | 0.44 ± 0.06 | 178 |
| LXXL-T | M10 | MT† | 0.64 ± 0.10 | 2.65 ± 0.15 | 0.59 ± 0.54 | 0.59 ± 0.07 | 114 |
Notes. (1) LT relation; (2) fit method; (3) assumption changed; (4) normalisation; (5) slope; (6) evolution term (E(z)γLT); (7) scatter; and (8) number of clusters predicted by the model.
Denotes the use of the Arnaud et al. (2005)MT relation.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.