Table 1
Key parameter comparison between the TMC and the ONC.
| Region | X-ray program1 | Distance (pc)2 | Age (Myr)3 | Ntotal 4 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||||
| ONC | COUP | 414 | ~2 | 277/163 | ||||||
| Taurus Molecular Cloud | XEST | 150 | ~1–2 | 105 | ||||||
Notes.
Name of the program from where the data were extracted (ONC Ref. Preibisch et al. 2005; TMC Ref. Telleschi et al. 2007; Güdel et al. 2007a).
Distance to the star-forming region (ONC Ref. Menten et al. 2007; TMC Ref. Telleschi et al. (2007)).
Mean log stellar age (ONC Ref. data from COUP and Reggiani et al. 2011; TMC Ref. Telleschi et al. 2007).
Number of sources used in the TMC analyses (Telleschi et al. 2007) and in the analyses of the ONC (Preibisch et al. 2005; this work). In the case of the ONC, the different numbers correspond to the sizes of each subsample studied.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.