Free Access

Table 3

Summary of the number of sources and beams involved in the simulations, as well as in the Herschel maps.

Wavelength Slim Abeam Ncompl IG Lcompl Nreal Beams/Source
(μm) (mJy) (arcmin2) (%) (%) (Nbeams/Nreal)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)

100 1.1 0.021 80 89 568 12
160 2.2 0.057 78 88 589 4
250 2.5 0.154 41 61 342 3
350 5.0 0.292 58 72 185 3
500 9.0 0.632 78 81 43 5

Notes. Column (2): flux density above which sources are detected in the simulation, i.e. confusion limit defined as the depth above which 68% of the sources get measured with a photometric accuracy better than 32%. Column (3): Abeam is the beam area at the central wavelength listed in Col. (1) defined as π× (0.73 × FWHM)2 (Dole et al. 2003; Oliver et al. 2010). Column (4): Ncompl is the completeness in % in number of clean sources (neib24 ≤ 1), i.e. the % of sources injected with SinSlim that are detected in the simulation as clean and with SoutSlim. Column (5): IGLcompl is the completeness in % in contribution to the IGL. Column (6): Nreal is the number of clean sources detected in the real Herschel maps above Slim. Column (7): beams/source is the number of beams per source, where Nbeams = 150′2/Abeam.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.