Table 1
Peak positions and widths given for Lorentzian and Gaussian fits.
| ID | Object | pL (μm) | wL (μm) | pG (μm) | wG (μm) |
|
|
|||||
| 1 | Oph IRS 48 | 69.170 | 0.269 | 69.168 | 0.521 |
| 2 | HD 141569 | 69.300 | 0.288 | 69.303 | 0.600 |
| 3 | HD 100546 | 69.191 | 0.317 | 69.194 | 0.681 |
| 4 | HD 179218 | 69.199 | 0.262 | 69.196 | 0.502 |
| 5 | HD 104237 | 69.240 | 0.212 | 69.224 | 0.351 |
| 6 | HD 144668 | 69.079 | 0.312 | 69.088 | 0.599 |
Notes. For clarity, they are both given so that they can be compared with the Lorentzian values derived for Beta Pic (de Vries et al. 2012). Gaussian values are taken from Sturm et al. (2013). The difference between Lorentzian and Gaussian widths stems from their definition.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.