Free Access
Erratum
This article is an erratum for: [this article]

Issue
A&A
Volume 572, December 2014
Article Number C2
Number of page(s) 2
Section Cosmology (including clusters of galaxies)
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321150e
Published online 04 December 2014

In our original publication (Ilić et al. 2013), we incorrectly assumed that the voids radii of the publicly available catalogue of Granett et al. (2008) were given in Mpc units, while they actually are provided in units of Mpc h-1. As a consequence, Figs. 1 and 12 of our original paper should be replaced by the ones shown in the present corrigendum (Figs. 1 and 2). Another small mistake was corrected in Fig. 1 where we used the comoving radius of some voids from the Sutter et al. (2012) catalogue instead of their proper radius.

thumbnail Fig. 1

Effective radii (in Mpc) as a function of redshift for all the voids used in this work. The two catalogues of Granett et al. (2008) and Pan et al. (2012), and the six subsamples of Sutter et al. (2012) are delimited by boxes labelled by their names. The black curves are here to indicate the angular size (in degrees) of a structure in the redshift-radius plane.

Open with DEXTER

Using the correct radii, the discrepancy between the most significant photometry scale and the size of the voids is less pronounced: the scale of the signal is comprised between 0.7 and 0.9 times the typical size of the voids. The significance of the signal itself does not change significantly and the rest of our discussion remains valid, notably concerning the peculiar features of this signal.

thumbnail Fig. 2

Temperature (top) and photometry (bottom) profiles for the original (left) and rescaled (right) stacking of Gr08 voids (same conventions as Fig. 7 of our original publication).

Open with DEXTER

References

  1. Granett, B. R., Neyrinck, M. C., & Szapudi, I. 2008, ApJ, 683, L99 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ilić, S., Langer, M., & Douspis, M. 2013, A&A, 556, A51 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  3. Pan, D. C., Vogeley, M. S., Hoyle, F., Choi, Y.-Y., & Park, C. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 926 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sutter, P. M., Lavaux, G., Wandelt, B. D., & Weinberg, D. H. 2012, ApJ, 761, 44 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

© ESO, 2014

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Effective radii (in Mpc) as a function of redshift for all the voids used in this work. The two catalogues of Granett et al. (2008) and Pan et al. (2012), and the six subsamples of Sutter et al. (2012) are delimited by boxes labelled by their names. The black curves are here to indicate the angular size (in degrees) of a structure in the redshift-radius plane.

Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

Temperature (top) and photometry (bottom) profiles for the original (left) and rescaled (right) stacking of Gr08 voids (same conventions as Fig. 7 of our original publication).

Open with DEXTER
In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.