Free Access

Table 5

Comparison between the observed 16 periods and theoretical ( = 1,2) periods corresponding to the seismological solutions in Case 3 (Cols. 3 and 4), with M = 0.87 M and Teff = 24 060 K, and considering the additional evolutionary sequences with masses between M = 0.74 M and M = 0.87 M (Cols. 5 and 6, Πk,zoom and kzoom).

Πobs,i Πk,Case 3 kC3 Πk,zoom kzoom

395.1 2 399.9 19 401.3 19
399.2 1 398.8 10 400.7 10
439.1 2 439.2 21 440.7 21
525.8 1 522.6 14 524.7 14
546.1 2 549.6 27 548.2 27
558.6 1 555.2 15 557.2 15
567.2 2 567.7 28 568.7 28
591.4 1 590.3 16 591.1 16
615.9 1 620.2 17 618.0 17
649.1 1 644.0 18 649.9 18
664.7 2 668.2 33 666.4 33
679.1 1 682.7 19 682.1 19
686.6 2 689.5 34 685.6 34
706.8 2 703.6 35 699.7 35
719.1 1 717.4 20 716.9 20
776.6 1 772.4 22 774.8 22

Notes. In the latter case, the model has M = 0.84 M and Teff = 25 050 K. Observed periods in italics are “fictitious” (average) periods (see text). The values in the model fits are fixed according to the solutions shown in Table 4 and the lower panels of Fig. 4.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.