Free Access

Table 9

Dispersion and offset of [Fe/H] and Teff from the residuals of the sample of the method and full sample against other studies.

(a) Selected sample

Photometric [Fe/H] calibrations rms offset N
Bonfils et al. (2005) 0.11 –0.06 65
Schlaufman & Laughlin (2010) 0.11 0.02 65
Johnson et al. (2012) 0.19 0.05 65

Spectroscopic [Fe/H] determinations rms offset N
All [Fe/H] values 0.11 0.05 55
Woolf & Wallerstein (2005) 0.09 –0.02 5
Rojas-Ayala et al. (2012) 0.12 0.03 19
Önehag et al. (2012) 0.08 0.05 8
Terrien et al. (2012) 0.07 0.06 7
Mann et al. (2013b) 0.16 0.11 7
Newton (2013) 0.11 0.07 5

Teff determinations rms offset N
Woolf & Wallerstein (2005) 122 116 5
Rojas-Ayala et al. (2012) 299 246 19
Önehag et al. (2012) 160 64 8
Boyajian et al. (2012) 157 129 49
Mann et al. (2013b) 167 133 7
Rajpurohit et al. (2013a) 132 100 8
(b) Full Sample

Spectroscopic [Fe/H] determinations rms offset N
Rojas-Ayala et al. (2012) 0.13 0.06 25
Newton (2013) 0.15 0.1 13

Teff values rms offset N
Rojas-Ayala et al. (2012) 304 222 25
Boyajian et al. (2012) 149 111 55
Rajpurohit et al. (2013a) 181 133 12

Notes. The last column shows the number of stars in common.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.