Table A.2
Comparison between the different scaling laws obtained with different dynamo models.
| Scaling | RPD | SPRD | YGC | |||
| c | x | c | x | c | x | |
|
|
||||||
| g | 1/r2 | 1/r2 | r | |||
|
|
||||||
| N ϱ | ≤0.1 | ∈ [0.5,4] | 0 | |||
|
|
||||||
|
||||||
| Multipolar | 0.59 | 0.29 | 1.19 | 0.34 | 0.65 | 0.35 |
| Dipolar | 0.92 | 0.32 | 1.58 | 0.35 | 1.08 | 0.37 |
|
1.42 | 0.39 | 1.66 | 0.42 | 1.79a | 0.44a |
| 0.73b | 0.39b | |||||
|
0.31 | 0.58 | 0.25 | 0.59 | 0.06 | 0.52 |
Notes. RPD refers to the present study, SPRD to Schrinner et al. (2014), and YGC to Yadav et al. (2013a), respectively. Yadav et al. (2013a) distinguished between dipolar and multipolar dynamos for their Rossby number scaling, whereas we derived a single power law for both classes of dynamo models.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.