Free Access

Table 3

Overall MCS results for our two methods.

Samples Pleiades MG
G P U N

Member 75.2% 17.1% 6.5% 1.2%
92.3% 7.7%

Non-member 0.3% 3.1% 11.1% 85.5%
3.4% 96.6%


Samples IC 2391 SC
G P U N

Member 58.3% 20.3% 8.6% 12.8%
78.6% 21.4%

Non-member 0.0% 0.4% 1.5% 98.1%
0.4% 99.6%


Samples Castor MG
G P U N

Member 86.3% 8.8% 0.4% 4.5%
95.1% 4.9%

Non-member 2.9% 3.9% 8.2% 85.0%
6.8% 93.2%


Samples UMa MG
G P U N

Member 90.5% 7.6% 0.0% 1.9%
98.1% 1.9%

Non-member 6.3% 6.9% 4.3% 82.5%
13.2% 86.8%


Samples Hyades SC
G P U N

Member 79.4% 11.8% 8.4% 0.4%
91.2% 8.8%

Non-member 4.3% 5.2% 13.6% 76.9%
9.5% 90.5%

Notes. For each sample and SKG, we list the fraction of sources in each membership group of the M2M method (Table 2) on the first line. The second line matches those of possible (“G” plus “P” categories) and unlikely (“U” plus “N” categories) candidates. Percentages in boldface indicate where our two methods agree. A sample of size 4000 gives margins of error of 1.5% and 2% at 95% and 99% confidence levels, respectively.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.