Free Access
Table 3
Best linear fit to the M1,r and M2,r as a function of ΔM1,2.
| Subsample | Mean redshift | a1 | b1 | a2 | b2 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| XMM-LSS (our catalog) | |||||||||||||||
| S–I | 0.175 | −21.44 ± 0.11 | −0.11 ± 0.10 | −21.42 ± 0.17 | 0.88 ± 0.11 | ||||||||||
| S–II | 0.325 | −21.66 ± 0.22 | −0.28 ± 0.15 | −21.67 ± 0.22 | 0.72 ± 0.20 | ||||||||||
| S–III | 0.625 | −22.13 ± 0.15 | −0.19 ± 0.12 | −22.14 ± 0.15 | 0.82 ± 0.13 | ||||||||||
| S–IV | 0.95 | −22.35 ± 0.15 | −0.30 ± 0.08 | −22.35 ± 0.16 | 0.70 ± 0.16 | ||||||||||
| COSMOS+AEGIS+XMM-LSS | |||||||||||||||
| red-sequence selection | 0.3 | −22.67 ± 0.15 | −0.10 ± 0.10 | −22.28 ± 0.14 | 0.46 ± 0.10 | ||||||||||
| spectroscopic selection | 0.3 | −22.72 ± 0.14 | −0.05 ± 0.09 | −22.34 ± 0.14 | 0.53 ± 0.09 | ||||||||||
| red-sequence selection | 0.9 | −23.67 ± 0.23 | 0.16 ± 0.34 | −23.69 ± 0.23 | 1.26 ± 0.33 | ||||||||||
| spectroscopic selection | 0.9 | −23.86 ± 0.21 | 0.37 ± 0.26 | −23.83 ± 0.20 | 1.48 ± 0.25 | ||||||||||
Notes. The four upper rows present coefficients of the linear fit to the butterfly diagrams of our catalog and four lower rows list those for the sample of 84 groups from COSMOS+AEGIS+XMM-LSS.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.