Free Access

Table 4

First ten sets of parameters best fitting the observation of N107.

group

N107 observation
8.00 19.0 / 5.3 / 2.5 / 12.6 7.6

Ten best fitting simulations
0.2 18 6 5.8 2.25 7.85 14.8 / 6.8 / 2.2 / 6.8 6.7 3.42 A*
0.2 16 6 4.2 2.25 7.90 14.0 / 6.8 / 2.5 / 6.8 5.6 3.44 A
2.7 12 28 15.5 1.00 8.40 16.3 / 7.4 / 2.4 / 7.4 6.8 3.65 B*
2.7 12 20 11.2 1.00 8.55 16.2 / 7.4 / 2.4 / 7.4 6.8 3.73 B
2.7 12 26 15.5 1.00 8.25 16.7 / 7.8 / 2.6 / 7.8 6.4 3.82 B
2.7 10 26 11.2 1.00 8.20 14.5 / 7.2 / 2.8 / 7.2 5.2 3.85 B
2.7 10 28 11.2 1.00 8.35 14.1 / 6.8 / 2.5 / 6.8 5.6 3.88 B
0.4 22 6 15.5 1.75 8.50 17.1 / 7.6 / 2.1 / 7.6 8.1 3.89 A
0.2 20 6 8.0 2.25 8.05 15.8 / 6.5 / 1.7 / 6.5 9.3 3.96 A
2.7 10 20 8.0 1.00 8.50 14.0 / 6.8 / 2.6 / 6.8 5.4 3.96 B

Notes. m1,2,3,4 are the masses of four sectors of the bubble; m1/m3 is the ratio of masses from the first and third sector, which quantify the mass contrast between the most and least massive sector; δ is a goodness-of-fit parameter (lower is better). The simulations are divided into two groups A and B, discussed at the end of Sect. 4.3. Further explanation of the table columns is also given in Sect. 4.3. The asterisk (*) marks two simulations – best of their group – which are visualised in Fig. 10.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.