Issue 
A&A
Volume 565, May 2014



Article Number  A24  
Number of page(s)  12  
Section  Interstellar and circumstellar matter  
DOI  https://doi.org/10.1051/00046361/201321417  
Published online  28 April 2014 
On the probability distribution function of the mass surface density of molecular clouds. I^{⋆}
Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 60 St. George Street, ON M5S3H8, Canada
email: fischera@cita.utoronto.ca
Received: 6 March 2013
Accepted: 28 February 2014
The probability distribution function (PDF) of the mass surface density is an essential characteristic of the structure of molecular clouds or the interstellar medium in general. Observations of the PDF of molecular clouds indicate a composition of a broad distribution around the maximum and a decreasing tail at high mass surface densities. The first component is attributed to the random distribution of gas which is modeled using a lognormal function while the second component is attributed to condensed structures modeled using a simple powerlaw. The aim of this paper is to provide an analytical model of the PDF of condensed structures which can be used by observers to extract information about the condensations. The condensed structures are considered to be either spheres or cylinders with a truncated radial density profile at cloud radius r_{cl}. The assumed profile is of the form ρ(r) = ρ_{c}/ (1 + (r/r_{0})^{2})^{n/ 2} for arbitrary power n where ρ_{c} and r_{0} are the central density and the inner radius, respectively. An implicit function is obtained which either truncates (sphere) or has a pole (cylinder) at maximal mass surface density. The PDF of spherical condensations and the asymptotic PDF of cylinders in the limit of infinite overdensity ρ_{c}/ρ(r_{cl}) flattens for steeper density profiles and has a power law asymptote at low and high mass surface densities and a well defined maximum. The power index of the asymptote Σ^{− γ} of the logarithmic PDF (ΣP(Σ)) in the limit of high mass surface densities is given by γ = (n + 1)/(n − 1) − 1 (spheres) or by γ = n/ (n − 1) − 1 (cylinders in the limit of infinite overdensity).
Key words: ISM: clouds / ISM: structure / methods: analytical / methods: statistical
Appendices are available in electronic form at http://www.aanda.org
© ESO, 2014
1. Introduction
Observations of the structure of molecular clouds provide insights about the physical processes in the cold dense phase of the interstellar medium and will give us a better understanding how they evolve and eventually form stars. They are furthermore essential to test theoretical models of the origin of the stellar mass function (Padoan et al. 1997b; Elmegreen 2001, 2011; Padoan & Nordlund 2002; Hennebelle & Chabrier 2008; Hopkins 2013a) and the star formation rate (Krumholz & McKee 2005; Padoan & Nordlund 2011; Hennebelle & Chabrier 2011; Federrath & Klessen 2012) which are both thought to be related to the density structure of a turbulent molecular gas.
The high resolution and sensitivity of modern telescopes allows a detailed analysis of the 1point statistic or probability distribution function (PDF) of the mass surface density of molecular cloud gas. They are obtained using either the reddening of stars (Kainulainen et al. 2009; Froebrich & Rowles 2010; Lombardi et al. 2010; Kainulainen & Tan 2013; Alves et al. 2014) or more recently the infrared emission of dust grains (Hill et al. 2011, 2012; Schneider et al. 2012, 2013b,a; Russeil et al. 2013).
Despite the complexity of the molecular clouds the observed PDFs of the mass surface density show very similar properties. They all are characterized by a broad peak and a tail at high mass surface densities approximately given by a power law. The PDF at low mass surface densities around the broad peak is attributed to randomly moving gas commonly referred to as “turbulence” while the tail is attributed to selfgravitating cloud structures. The relative amount of the two different components seems to be related to the star formation activity in the cloud as discussed by Kainulainen et al. (2009). While nonstar forming clouds as the “Coalsack” or the “Lupus V” region show only a very low or no evidence of a tail the PDFs of star forming clouds as “Taurus” or “Orion” are characterized by a strong tail with no clear separation between the two components.
The observations seem to be broadly consistent with current simulations of turbulent molecular clouds. Turbulence would naturally create a wide range of densities and simulations of driven isothermal turbulence have shown that the corresponding PDF has a lognormal form (VazquezSemadeni 1994; Padoan et al. 1997a; Passot & VázquezSemadeni 1998), a result which has been confirmed analytically (Nordlund & Padoan 1999). The projection of the density of those simulations has also been found to be closely lognormal in shape (Ostriker et al. 2001; VázquezSemadeni & García 2001; Federrath et al. 2010; Brunt et al. 2010a). Deviations are expected for non isothermal turbulence which produces higher probabilities at low or high densities (Scalo et al. 1998; Passot & VázquezSemadeni 1998; Li et al. 2003). More recent simulations of forced turbulence also show depending on the assumed forcing for the PDF of the volume density a deviation from the lognormal function with enhanced probabilities at low densities (Federrath et al. 2008; Konstandin et al. 2012; Federrath 2013). The functional form is as shown by Federrath (2013) approximately described by a statistical function proposed by Hopkins (2013b).
Simulations of the time evolution of molecular clouds have shown that at late stage the PDF of the volume density would develop a taillike structure at high density values (Klessen 2000; Dib & Burkert 2005; VázquezSemadeni et al. 2008). The same behavior is also seen in the PDF of the mass surface density (BallesterosParedes et al. 2011; Kritsuk et al. 2011; Federrath & Klessen 2013).
Currently, observed PDFs are analyzed using a lognormal function for the peak and a simple power law for the tail, respectively. The lognormal function allows a first estimate of the density contrast of the volume density in a turbulent medium based on the fundamental relation of the statistical properties of the mass surface density and the ones of the volume density as provided by Fischera & Dopita (2004) and also by Brunt et al. (2010b,a). The interpretation of the tail is frequently based upon a simple power law density profile ρ(r) ∝ r^{− n} of spheres where the PDF of the mass surface density is also a power law. In case of the logarithmic PDF (ΣP(Σ) = P(lnΣ))^{1} the corresponding power law would be Σ^{− γ} with γ = 2/(n − 1) (Kritsuk et al. 2011; Federrath & Klessen 2013). Applying this relation the slope of the tail of the PDF of a number of star forming molecular clouds indicates a radial density profile with a power index n ~ 2 (Schneider et al. 2013a) as expected for collapsing clouds. A different approach has been chosen by Kainulainen & Tan (2013) who also applied a lognormal function to the tail.
However, the analytical functions show partly strong deviations to the observed curves. Most of the PDFs published by Kainulainen et al. (2009) reveal a tail at low mass surface densities below the peak which cannot be explained in terms of the simple analytical function. The tail at high mass surface densities has several features which are not expected using simple power law profiles of the radial density. Foremost, the tail is restricted to a certain range of mass surface densities. For a number of PDFs published by Kainulainen et al. (2009) the tail indicates a strong cutoff or a strong change of the slope around A_{V} = 6−10 mag. The interpretation of the tail is further complicated by the observational facts that condensed clouds are generally located on a certain background level and that they are restricted to small regions within the cloud complex as e.g. in case of the Rosette molecular cloud (Schneider et al. 2012). The tail is therefore not necessarily a simple power law nor directly related to the radial density profile. Furthermore, the analytical functions do not provide a physical explanation for the peak position of the PDF which occurs in case of a number of molecular clouds around A_{V} ~ 1 mag.
In this and the following papers an analytical physical model of the global PDF of molecular clouds is developed which resembles the main observed features and is meant to derive basic physical parameters of star forming molecular clouds as the pressure and the density contrast in the turbulent gas. This paper focuses on the 1point statistical properties of individual condensed structures, assumed to be spheres and cylinders.
In Sect. 2 an analytical solution of the mass surface density and the corresponding PDFs for the considered shapes is presented which is based on a truncated analytical density profile widely used in astrophysical problems. In Sect. 3 the properties of the PDFs are discussed and asymptotes for low and high mass surface densities are provided. Also studied is the location of the maximum position of the logarithmic and linear PDF. A summary is given in Sect. 4. The technical details can be found in the appendices.
2. Model of the PDF of the mass surface density of condensed structures
2.1. Radial density profiles
Let us assume for the condensed structures a simple analytical density profile given by (1)where ρ_{c} is the density in the cloud center and r_{0} the inner radius. The density profile has a flat part in the inner region (r ≪ r_{0}) which approaches asymptotically a power law ρ ∝ r^{− n} at large radii (r ≫ r_{0}). In studies of stellar clusters this inner radius is frequently referred to as “core radius” (King 1962, 1966a,b). The analytical profile is used in astrophysics for its convenience and as generalization of physical density profiles to model the stellar surface brightness of Globular clusters (e.g. Elson et al. 1987; Elson 1992) and more recently the dust emission of dense filaments (e.g. Arzoumanian et al. 2011; Malinen et al. 2012; Juvela et al. 2012).
We make another reasonable assumption that the profile is truncated at radius r_{cl} as expected if the clouds are cold structures embedded in warmer gas. In case of pressure equilibrium the gas pressure at the outer boundary of the condensed structure would be equal to the pressure p_{ext} in the surrounding medium. We refer to the inverse of the density ratio ρ(r_{cl}) /ρ_{c} = q of the density at cloud radius and cloud center as “overdensity”. In case of isothermal clouds this ratio is identical with the term “overpressure” used to characterize the gravitational state of selfgravitating structures in previous studies of pressurized clouds (Fischera & Dopita 2008; Fischera 2011; Fischera & Martin 2012b,a).
Specific profiles with certain values of the power n are known solutions for the physical problem of selfgravitating gaseous clouds. The profile for n = 5 is valid for a gaseous sphere where the temperature of the gas is regulated by the adiabatic law with a ratio 1.2 of the two specific heats (Schuster 1884; Jeans 1916). This density profile has been applied to describe the surface brightness profiles of globular clusters and is known as Plummermodel (Plummer 1911, 1915). The density profiles which correspond to the power indices n = 2, 3, and 4 are related to profiles of isothermal selfgravitating clouds.
The profile with n = 4 is the exact solution for a selfgravitating isothermal cylinder (Stodólkiewicz 1963; Ostriker 1964). The radial density profile of pressurized isothermal selfgravitating spheres, referred to as BonnorEbert sphere (Ebert 1955; Bonnor 1956), cannot be expressed through a simple analytical formula. However, the profile for spherical clouds up to an overdensity ~100 is in excellent agreement with the analytical profile with n = 3. The profile with n = 3 is also identical with the well known King model without truncation (King 1962, 1966a). The radial density profile of spheres with higher overdensity might be approximated with a profile where n = 2. The statistical properties of isothermal clouds are analyzed in more detail in a forthcoming paper (Fischera 2014).
Fig. 1 Normalized mass surface density X_{n} as function of 1 − y_{n} for truncated density profiles as given in Eq. (1) for various power indices n ranging from 0 to 10. The thicker lines correspond to n = 0, 1, and 3. For a fixed pressure ratio q the mass surface densities for a given power index n vary from the central value at 1 − y_{n} = q^{2 /n} to zero at the edge of the cloud where 1 − y_{n} = 1. The central values of the normalized mass surface density for various pressure ratios q are shown as thin gray lines. 

Open with DEXTER 
Fig. 2 Profiles of the normalized mass surface density X_{n} of a truncated density profile as given in Eq. (1) for three assumptions of the pressure ratio q = p_{ext}/p_{c}. The maxima or the curves are labeled with the corresponding power index n. The profiles for n = 1 and n = 3 are enhanced with a thicker line. The dashed lines are Gaussian approximations (Eq. (A.21)) where the variance is obtained using Eq. (A.20). The profile for n = 0 need to be considered as an asymptote. 

Open with DEXTER 
2.2. Mass surface density profiles
The mass surface density profile of a truncated analytical density profile (Eq. (1)) of a sphere or a cylinder seen at inclination angle i where i = 0° refers to a cylinder seen edgeon is given by (2)where β = 0 for spheres and β = 1 for cylinders. In the following it is convenient to define a parameter (3)where x = 0 ≤ r/r_{cl} ≤ 1 is the normalized impact parameter where r is the projected radius and r_{cl} the cloud radius. The profile of the mass surface density can then be written as (4)where (5)In case of isothermal selfgravitating pressurized clouds the product of inner radius and central density is proportional to and is given by (6)where p_{ext} is the external pressure, G the gravitational constant and where ξ_{2} = 2, ξ_{3} = 8.63, and ξ_{4} = 8 (Fischera 2014).
It is convenient to consider the normalized mass surface density (7)which depends only on the parameter y_{n}. The functional dependence is shown in Fig. 1.
Profiles of the normalized mass surface density for a number of different assumptions for the power index n of a truncated density profile are shown in Fig. 2. The method used to derive the profiles is described in Sects. A.1 and A.2. The profiles for n = 1, 2, 3, and 4 are simple analytical functions given in Appendix A.3. At an overdensity of 10 the inner part of the profiles of cylinders and spheres closely resembles a Gaussian approximation with a width as given in Sect. A.4.
2.3. PDF of the mass surface density
The PDF of the mass surface density can be given as an implicit function of y_{n}. In the limit y_{n} → 1 and y_{n} → 0 also explicit expressions of the asymptotic behavior of the PDF can be given and are discussed.
The PDF for the mass surface density is given by (8)where P(r) is the probability to measure a mass surface density at impact radius r. For a sphere this is given by and for a cylinder P(r) = 1 /r_{cyl}. It is convenient to consider the PDF of the normalized mass surface density as defined in Eq. (7) which is given by (9)with β = 0 for spheres and β = 1 for cylinders.
By taking the derivative of Eq. (4) it is straightforward to show that (10)For spheres we obtain the implicit function (11)As we see the normalized PDF (1 − q^{2 /n})P_{sph}(X_{n}) is an implicit function of the parameter y_{n} alone. The corresponding PDF for cylinders is (12)where the normalized impact parameter can be expressed through (13)The PDF has a pole at the maximum mass surface density (x = 0) or where y_{n} = 1 − q^{2 /n} (Fig. 3).
Because of the pole for cylinders we have therefore not a generalized form of the PDF that depends only on the parameter y_{n}. However, to obtain an expression which allows a similar discussion in the following section for spheres and cylinders we can consider the asymptotic PDF for infinitely high overdensity. In the limit 1 − y_{n} ≫ q^{2 /n} the impact parameter behaves as (14)We consider therefore the following asymptotic PDF (15)As shown in Appendix B the asymptotic PDF provides for all q the correct asymptote in the limit of small mass surface densities and the correct asymptotic behavior at large mass surface densities for q → 0.
3. Characteristics of the PDF
The PDFs of spheres and the asymptotic PDFs of cylinders with a truncated analytical density profile for various different assumptions for the power n and the pressure ratio q are shown in Fig. 4. They are truncated at the highest mass surface density.
The exact asymptotes for high and low mass surface densities also shown in the figure are derived in Appendix B. The maximum position is discussed in more detail in Appendix C.
The curves have a functional form that depends only on the power n of the radial density profile. They are truncated at the central mass surface density.
Fig. 3 PDF of the normalized mass surface density X_{n} of cylindrical clouds having a density distribution with n = 1 (gray lines) and n = 4 (black lines). The clouds have an overdensity (1 /q) of either 10 or 100. The long dashed curves show the asymptote for infinite high overdensity. The dotted lines mark the asymptotic value at the poles. The short dashed lines give the asymptotic values in the limit of high and low values of X_{n}. 

Open with DEXTER 
Fig. 4 PDF of the normalized mass surface density X_{n} in case of spheres (top figure) and the asymptotic PDF in case of cylinders (bottom figure) with a truncated radial density profile given by Eq. (1) for various assumptions of the power n. The thin lines show at which mass surface density X_{n} at given density ratio q = ρ(r_{cl}) /ρ_{c} the PDF corresponding to a certain power n truncates (for spheres) or has a pole (for cylinders). The lines are labeled with log _{10}q. The dashed lines show the asymptotic behavior at large and small X_{n}. 

Open with DEXTER 
3.1. Asymptotes at high and low mass surface densities
Fig. 5 Maxima position of the PDF of the parameter y_{n} and the normalized mass surface density X_{n} for spheres (top) and cylinders (bottom) as function of the power n (dotted curves). Black lines correspond to the linear PDF and the gray lines to logarithmic PDF. The solid curves are polynomial fits to the accurate position values. The values for isothermal selfgravitating spheres (n = 2 and n = 3) and cylinders (n = 4) are shown as small diamonds. The asymptotic behavior of [X_{n}] _{max} = 1/(1 − n) for n → 0 for cylinders is shown as dashed line. Asymptotes described in Appendix C.1.1 are shown as dashed lines. 

Open with DEXTER 
At low mass surface densities the PDF approaches asymptotically a power law P(Σ) ∝ Σ. The asymptotic behavior at high mass surface densities depends on the steepness of the radial density profile. For n> 1 the PDF approaches asymptotically a power law given by (16)As can be seen in the figure the asymptote is a better representation of the PDF at high mass surface densities for steeper density profiles. In the limit of large power n the PDF at high mass surface densities becomes as expected for a source with a Gaussian density profile (Appendix B.3.1). For n = 1 the PDF at high mass surface density is an exponential function (17)For clouds with n< 1 the PDF is limited to a maximum mass surface density given by X_{n} = 1/(1 − n). In the neighborhood of this maximum value the PDF varies strongly with mass surface density. In the limit of n = 0 the PDF becomes identical to the PDF of a homogeneous sphere or cylinder.
The power law asymptote at high mass surface densities may be used to infer the power n of the radial density profile. For spheres a power law P_{sph} ∝ Σ^{− α} would indicate a power index n = (α + 1)/(α − 1) of the radial density profile as can be derived for simple power law density profiles (Kritsuk et al. 2011; Federrath & Klessen 2013). As shown in Fig. 3 the asymptotic behavior at large mass surface densities in case of cylinders is only established for sufficiently high overdensities. For example, a profile with n = 4 which is consistent with the density profile of selfgravitating isothermal cylinders the PDF for overdensities as high as 100 has no apparent power law at high mass surface densities. For cylinders with high overpressure the PDF at the pole is approximately given by . A power law is only established for the range [X_{n}] _{max} ≪ X_{n} ≪ X_{n}(0) where [X_{n}] _{max} is the mass surface density at the PDF maximum (Sect. 3.2).
3.2. The maxima of the asymptotic PDF
As we see in Fig. 4 the PDF of spheres and the asymptotic PDF of cylinders with the analytical density profile have well defined maxima at [X_{n}] _{max} which depend only on the power n. This allows a simple interpretation of the observed mass surface density at the peak position in terms of the normalization factor 2r_{0}ρ_{c}q^{(n − 1) /n} for given n using the definition Eq. (7). In case of isothermal clouds the maximum position can be used to infer the pressure in the ambient medium.
Maxima positions of the linear and logarithmic PDF.
Coefficients of the polynomial approximation of the maximum position of the asymptotic PDF.
Related to the maximum position is a parameter [y_{n}] _{max}. The functional dependence of the maximum position [y_{n}] _{max} and [X_{n}] _{max} of the linear and logarithmic asymptotic PDF on the power n is shown in Fig. 5. The curves are derived by solving the conditional equations given in Appendix C. Selected values are given in Table 1.
As shown in Appendix B.3.2, in the limit n → 0 the PDFs become the ones of homogeneous spheres and cylinders where the maximum value is related to the central mass surface density. In this limit we have therefore [y_{n}] _{max} → 1 and [X_{n}] _{max} = 1. In case of cylinders the normalized mass surface density at PDF maximum in the limit of flat density profiles is approximately given by [X_{n}] _{max} = 1/(1 − n).
The parameter [y_{n}] _{max} provides for given power n an estimate of the corresponding impact parameter as function of the pressure ratio q based on Eq. (13). Below a minimum overpressure (1 − [y_{n}] _{max})^{− n/ 2} the maximum coincides with the central mass surface density. At higher overpressures the impact parameter moves outwards and reaches asymptotically a maximum value . If we consider for example the logarithmic PDF of a sphere with n = 3 the minimum overdensity with x = 0 is (18)where the parameter [y_{n}] _{max} is taken from Table 1. In the limit q → 0 the impact parameter at the PDF maximum becomes (19)As the maximum position [y_{n}] _{max} decreases with n the impact parameter related to the PDF maximum is larger for steeper density profiles and reaches x = 1 for n → ∞. In case of the logarithmic PDF the mass surface density related to the PDF maximum is larger in respect to the linear PDF and corresponds to a smaller impact parameter.
The dependence of the maxima of the linear PDF in the limit n → ∞ can be described by simple power laws as shown in Appendix C.1.1. The asymptotes for [y_{n}] _{max} and [X_{n}] _{max} provide as shown in Fig. 5 good results for spheres above n ≈ 3 and for cylinders above n ≈ 1.
The ratio (20)between the central mass surface density [X_{n}] _{cut} and the mass surface at the PDF maximum can be used to infer the pressure ratio q for given power n. As an example we consider a critical stable sphere which radial density profile is close to the analytical profile with n = 3. The critical stable sphere has a density ratio of q ≈ 1/14.04 Applying Eq. (A.12) we find that the corresponding central mass surface density is given by (21)For critical stable spheres the ratio between the cutoff and the maximum of the logarithmic PDF is therefore given by (22)where the maximum position is taken from Table 1.
The functional dependence of the maximum position on the power n can over a large range be well fitted by a polynomial function
where N_{max} = 6 for spheres and N_{max} = 5 for cylinders. The coefficients are listed in Table 2.
4. Summary and conclusion
The study summarizes a series of properties of the PDF of the mass surface density of spherical and cylindrical structures having an analytical radial density profile ρ = ρ_{c}/ (1 + (r/r_{0})^{2})^{n/ 2} where ρ_{c} is the central density and r_{0} the inner radius. The profiles are assumed to be truncated at a cloud radius r_{cl} as expected for cold structures embedded in a considerably warmer medium. The results are therefore applicable to individual condensed structures in star forming molecular clouds.
The PDF for given geometry is determined by the power n, the density ratio q = ρ(r_{cl}) /ρ_{c}, the product ρ_{c}r_{0}, and, in case of a cylinder, the inclination angle i. It is convenient to describe the properties of the PDF in terms of the unit free mass surface density defined by (25)where β = 0 for spheres and β = 1 for cylinders. The properties are:

1.
For given geometry and power index n the PDF is a simpleimplicit function of the pressure ratio q and the parameter y_{n} = (1 − q^{2 /n})(1 − x^{2}) where x = r/r_{cl} isthe normalized impact parameter.

2.
At the central mass surface density X_{n}(0) the PDF of spheres has a sharp cutoff while the PDF of cylinders has a pole.

3.
At high overdensities the PDF has a well defined maximum at fixed [X_{n}] _{max}.

4.
At mass surface densities which are small relative to the maximum position the asymptotic PDF approaches asymptotically a power law P(X_{n}) ∝ X_{n}.

5.
In the limit of high overdensities the PDFs approach for n> 1 at mass surface densities above the peak asymptotically power laws. They are given by in case of spheres and, with the exception of the pole, by in case of cylinders. For given overdensity the asymptote is a better approximation for steeper density profiles (larger n).

6.
For n< 1 the PDF has a strong cutoff and is limited to a maximum mass surface density X_{n} ≤ 1/(1 − n).
The slope of the PDF at high mass surface densities can also be obtained assuming a simple power law profile for spherical clouds (e.g. Kritsuk et al. 2011; Federrath & Klessen 2013). But it should be considered that this profile only is an asymptotic behavior in the limit of high overdensities and seems more appropriate for collapsing clouds while most condensations might not be in such a state. As shown in the paper in general the shape of the PDF is not a power law. Further, the profile would produce a nonphysical high probability at low mass surface densities.
The derived properties are related to background subtracted structures within molecular clouds. They are therefore not directly applicable to measurements of the global PDF of molecular clouds which is a statistical mean of different properties not only of the condensed structures but the surrounding medium as well. For instance the tail at high mass surface densities seen in the PDF of star forming molecular clouds may have different physical explanations. It also need to be considered that the functional form of the PDF is affected by an additional background. In case of filaments the situation is furthermore complicated through a possible variation of the inclination angle. Those problems are addressed in a following paper (Fischera 2014) based on isothermal selfgravitating pressurized spheres and cylinders.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Canadian Space Agency. The author likes to thank Prof. P. G. Martin and Dr. Richard Tuffs for his support, Quang Nguyen Luong for reading the manuscript and his helpful comments, and the unknown referee for the suggestions.
References
 Abramowitz, M., & Stegun, I. A. 1972, Handbook of Mathematical Functions, (National Bureau of Standards) (New York: Dover) [Google Scholar]
 Alves, J., Lombardi, M., & Lada, C. 2014, A&A, 565, A18 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Arzoumanian, D., André, P., Didelon, P., et al. 2011, A&A, 529, L6 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 BallesterosParedes, J., VázquezSemadeni, E., Gazol, A., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 1436 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Bonnor, W. B. 1956, MNRAS, 116, 351 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Brunt, C. M., Federrath, C., & Price, D. J. 2010a, MNRAS, 405, L56 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Brunt, C. M., Federrath, C., & Price, D. J. 2010b, MNRAS, 403, 1507 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Dib, S., & Burkert, A. 2005, ApJ, 630, 238 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Ebert, R. 1955, Z. Astrophys., 37, 217 [Google Scholar]
 Elmegreen, B. G. 2001, in From Darkness to Light: Origin and Evolution of Young Stellar Clusters, eds. T. Montmerle, & P. André, ASP Conf. Ser., 243, 255 [Google Scholar]
 Elmegreen, B. G. 2011, ApJ, 731, 61 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Elson, R. A. W. 1992, MNRAS, 256, 515 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Elson, R. A. W., Fall, S. M., & Freeman, K. C. 1987, ApJ, 323, 54 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Federrath, C. 2013, MNRAS, 436, 1245 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Federrath, C., & Klessen, R. S. 2012, ApJ, 761, 156 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Federrath, C., & Klessen, R. S. 2013, ApJ, 763, 51 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Federrath, C., Klessen, R. S., & Schmidt, W. 2008, ApJ, 688, L79 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Federrath, C., RomanDuval, J., Klessen, R. S., Schmidt, W., & Mac Low, M.M. 2010, A&A, 512, A81 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Fischera, J. 2011, A&A, 526, A33 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Fischera, J. 2014, A&A, submitted [Google Scholar]
 Fischera, J., & Dopita, M. 2004, ApJ, 611, 911 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Fischera, J., & Dopita, M. 2008, ApJS, 176, 164 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Fischera, J., & Martin, P. G. 2012a, A&A, 547, A86 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Fischera, J., & Martin, P. G. 2012b, A&A, 542, A77 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Froebrich, D., & Rowles, J. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 1350 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Hennebelle, P., & Chabrier, G. 2008, ApJ, 684, 395 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Hennebelle, P., & Chabrier, G. 2011, ApJ, 743, L29 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Hill, T., Motte, F., Didelon, P., et al. 2011, A&A, 533, A94 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Hill, T., Motte, F., Didelon, P., et al. 2012, A&A, 542, A114 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Hopkins, P. F. 2013a, MNRAS, 430, 1653 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Hopkins, P. F. 2013b, MNRAS, 430, 1880 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Jeans, J. H. 1916, MNRAS, 76, 567 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Juvela, M., Malinen, J., & Lunttila, T. 2012, A&A, 544, A141 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Kainulainen, J., & Tan, J. C. 2013, A&A, 549, A53 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Kainulainen, J., Beuther, H., Henning, T., & Plume, R. 2009, A&A, 508, L35 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 King, I. 1962, AJ, 67, 471 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 King, I. R. 1966a, AJ, 71, 64 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 King, I. R. 1966b, AJ, 71, 276 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Klessen, R. S. 2000, ApJ, 535, 869 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Konstandin, L., Girichidis, P., Federrath, C., & Klessen, R. S. 2012, ApJ, 761, 149 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Kritsuk, A. G., Norman, M. L., & Wagner, R. 2011, ApJ, 727, L20 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Krumholz, M. R., & McKee, C. F. 2005, ApJ, 630, 250 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Li, Y., Klessen, R. S., & Mac Low, M.M. 2003, ApJ, 592, 975 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Lombardi, M., Lada, C. J., & Alves, J. 2010, A&A, 512, A67 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Malinen, J., Juvela, M., Rawlings, M. G., et al. 2012, A&A, 544, A50 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Nordlund, Å. P., & Padoan, P. 1999, in Insterstellar Turbulence, eds. J. Franco, & A. Carramiñana (Cambridge University Press), 218 [Google Scholar]
 Ostriker, E. C., Stone, J. M., & Gammie, C. F. 2001, ApJ, 546, 980 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Ostriker, J. 1964, ApJ, 140, 1056 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
 Padoan, P., & Nordlund, Å. 2002, ApJ, 576, 870 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Padoan, P., & Nordlund, Å. 2011, ApJ, 730, 40 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Padoan, P., Jones, B. J. T., & Nordlund, A. P. 1997a, ApJ, 474, 730 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Padoan, P., Nordlund, A., & Jones, B. J. T. 1997b, MNRAS, 288, 145 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Passot, T., & VázquezSemadeni, E. 1998, Phys. Rev. E, 58, 4501 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Plummer, H. C. 1911, MNRAS, 71, 460 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Plummer, H. C. 1915, MNRAS, 76, 107 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Russeil, D., Schneider, N., Anderson, L. D., et al. 2013, A&A, 554, A42 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Scalo, J., VazquezSemadeni, E., Chappell, D., & Passot, T. 1998, ApJ, 504, 835 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Schneider, N., Csengeri, T., Hennemann, M., et al. 2012, A&A, 540, L11 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Schneider, N., André, P., Könyves, V., et al. 2013a, ApJ, 766, L17 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Schneider, N., Csengeri, T., Hennemann, M., et al. 2013b, A&A, 551, C1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Schuster, A. 1884, Brit. Ass. Rep., 53rd Meeting (1883), 428 [Google Scholar]
 Stodólkiewicz, J. S. 1963, Acta Astron., 13, 30 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 VazquezSemadeni, E. 1994, ApJ, 423, 681 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 VázquezSemadeni, E., & García, N. 2001, ApJ, 557, 727 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 VázquezSemadeni, E., González, R. F., BallesterosParedes, J., Gazol, A., & Kim, J. 2008, MNRAS, 390, 769 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
Online material
Appendix A: Solution for the mass surface density profile
Appendix A.1: Case n ≥ 1
In case n> 1 the integral can be expressed through the incomplete and complete beta function (A.1)with the condition a,b> 0 where the normalized incomplete beta function is given by (A.2)The beta function is equal to (A.3)where Γ(x) is the Γfunction given by (A.4)In Appendix D the asymptotic behavior of I_{ξ}(a,b) with a = (n − 1)/2 and b = 0.5 is discussed. In general the asymptotic behavior is better for higher powers of a.
The mass surface density for given external pressure and overdensity through the cloud center for n> 1 is (A.5)In the limit of high overdensity (q → 0) the central mass surface density becomes the asymptotic value (A.6)
Appendix A.2: Case n < 1
To estimate the profile for n< 1 we can transform the integral to (A.7)The integral can then be calculated using the complete and incomplete beta function as in Eq. (A.1). The mass surface density profile becomes (A.8)In the limit of high overdensity the central mass surface density approaches asymptotically a maximum value given by (A.9)
Appendix A.3: Analytical profiles of the mass surface densities
The mass surface density profiles of the truncated analytical density profile for any natural number n = 1,2,... can be expressed through simple analytical functions. For n = 1, 2, 3, and 4 the profiles are for example given by where y_{n} = (1 − x^{2})(1 − q^{2 /n}). The profiles of higher orders can be derived by applying successively the integral transform Eq. (A.7).
The profile n = 4 applies for isothermal selfgravitating pressurized cylinders. For cylinders exist a maximum mass line density given by [M/l] _{max} = 2K/G where G is the gravitational constant. K is a constant given by K = kT/ (μm_{H}) where T is the effective temperature, k the Boltzmann constant, μ the mean molecular weight and m_{H} is the atomic mass of hydrogen. If we replace the pressure ratio with q = (1 − f)^{2} where f = (M/l)/ [M/l] _{max} ≤ 1 is the normalized mass line density we obtain the expression given in the work of Fischera & Martin (2012a). The profile for n = 3 closely describes the profile of BonnorEbert spheres with overdensities less than ~100 (Fischera 2014).
Appendix A.4: Gaussian approximation (n →∞)
Under certain circumstances the inner region of the profile can be approximated by a Gaussian function as will be shown in the following where the width is related to physical parameters as the overdensity q^{1} and the inner radius r_{0}.
The density profile can in general be expressed through (A.14)where (A.15)Where (xr_{cl}/r_{0})^{2} ≪ 1 we can linearize the logarithm using ln [1 + (xr_{cl}/r_{0})^{2}] ≈ (xr_{cl}/r_{0})^{2} and we obtain a Gaussian density profile (A.16)where the variance is given by (A.17)The approximation improves with power n. In case of a pressure ratio q the density profile becomes approximately a Gaussian function for all impact parameters if n ≫ − 2lnq/ ln2 or . For large n the variance becomes (A.18)which decreases slowly with overdensity.
In a similar approach we can derive the asymptotic profile of the mass surface density. Considering the same condition for n as above we obtain for example for (A.19)also a Gaussian form where the variance of the mass surface density is given by (A.20)where σ_{Σ} ≈ σ_{ρ} = σ for large n.
The central region (x ≪ r_{0}/r_{cl}) of the profile is therefore approximately given by a Gaussian function (A.21)The approximation provides the exact central mass surface density.
We want to consider the case of high overdensity and large power n so that the contribution of the incomplete beta function in the central region of the cloud becomes negligible (see Appendix D). In the limit of large n the beta function becomes (A.22)Replacing n through the variance of the density profile we obtain for the asymptotic profile for given overdensity (A.23)
Appendix B: Asymptotes of the PDF
Appendix B.1: Asymptotes in the limit y_{n} → 0 (low X_{n})
In the limit of large impact parameters (x → 1) it follows that y_{n} → 0 and consequently . The integrand in Eq. (4) is approximately a constant so that the unitfree mass surface density becomes (B.1)From Eq. (11) we find directly the corresponding asymptotic behavior for spheres which is given by (B.2)For cylinders we find from Eq. (15) (B.3)For q^{2 /n} → 0 we obtain the asymptote of the probability function of homogeneous spheres or cylinders.
Appendix B.2: Asymptotes in the limit y_{n} → 1 (high X_{n})
Appendix B.2.1: Asymptotes for n> 1
In the limit of low impact parameter (x → 0) and high overdensity (q ≪ 1) we have y_{n} → 1 − q^{2 /n} ~ 1. The normalized mass surface density is then approximately given by (B.4)where ζ_{n} = 0.5 B((n − 1)/2,1/2). We can use this relation to replace 1 − y_{n} to obtain an expression of the PDF as function of the mass surface density.
For the PDF of spheres we find that at high mass surface densities the PDF approaches asymptotically a power law given by (B.5)For the asymptotic PDF of cylinders we find (B.6)Replacing 1 − y_{n} in the Eq. (12) with the above expression for the mass surface density provides the asymptotic behavior of the PDF of cylinders at the pole given by (B.7)where is the central mass surface density. A power law is only established for cylinders with sufficiently high overpressure so that (X_{n}/X_{n}(0))^{2/(n − 1)} ≪ 1.
Appendix B.2.2: Asymptotes for n = 1
In the limit of large y_{1} the mass surface density behaves as (B.8)Replacing (B.9)in Eq. (11) and in Eq. (15) provides the asymptotes (B.10)for and(B.11)For the special case n = 1 the PDF at high mass surface densities is therefore approximately described by a simple exponential function. The asymptotic behavior of the PDF for a cylinder including the region at the pole is (B.12)where X_{1}(0) = ln(2q^{1}).
Appendix B.2.3: Asymptotes for n< 1
As pointed out in Appendix A.2 for n< 1 the mass surface density has a maximum possible value. In the limit y_{n} → 1 we have (B.13)As can be shown we have P_{sph}(X_{n}) → 0 and for X_{n} → 1/(1 − n).
Appendix B.3: Asymptote of the PDF for high/low n
Appendix B.3.1: Asymptote in the limit n→∞
As we have seen in the previous section in the limit of high n the power law slope at high mass surface densities approaches asymptotically α = 1. The corresponding PDF can be directly obtained from Eq. (B.5). Replacing n − 1 by the standard deviation of the Gaussian approximation we get for spheres with high overdensity in the limit of n → ∞(B.14)The same result is obtained from Eq. (A.23) by deriving the corresponding derivative and using Eq. (8). For the asymptotic PDF of cylinders Eq. (B.6) (B.15)
Appendix B.3.2: Asymptote in the limit n→ 0
In the limit n → 0 it follows from Eq. (A.8) for the mass surface density (B.16)In case of spheres the PDF of the mass surface density becomes (B.17)which is the PDF of homogeneous spheres. Likewise, we find for the asymptotic PDF of cylindrical clouds in the limit n → 0 that (B.18)which is the PDF of a homogeneous cylinder.
Appendix C: Condition for PDF maxima
The maxima position were derived for both linear and logarithmic PDFs of spheres and cylinders. For cylinders the asymptotic PDF as defined in Eq. (15) was considered.
Appendix C.1: For linear values (P(Σ_{n}))
The condition for maxima of the linear PDF is given by (C.1)This leads to (C.2)in case spheres and to (C.3)for cylinders. For n = 1 and n = 3 the maxima are simple analytical expressions listed in Table 1.
Appendix C.1.1: Approximation for n≫ 1
In the limit n ≫ 1 the condition for maxima of the linear PDF is equal for spheres and cylinders and is given by (C.4)As y_{n} → 0 for n → ∞ it follows from Eqs. (D.7) and (A.22) that the mass surface density behaves approximately as (C.5)where P(χ^{2},1) is the PDF of the χ^{2}distribution and where (C.6)In the limit of n ≫ 1 the condition for maxima becomes a function of ny_{n} = C where C is a constant. Solving (C.7)provides C ≈ 0.58404. The maxima position is therefore approximately given by
Appendix C.2: For logarithmic values (Σ_{n} P(Σ_{n}))
The maxima of the PDF of logarithm values are given by the condition (C.10)This leads to (C.11)in case of spheres and to (C.12)in case of cylinders. For n = 3 the maxima positions are again simple analytical expressions given in Table 1.
Appendix D: Asymptotic behavior of the incomplete beta function
To derive the asymptotic behavior of the incomplete beta function in Eq. (4) for the mass surface density in the limit n ≫ 1 we consider the approximation (Eq. (26.5.20), of Abramowitz & Stegun 1972) (D.1)where P(χ^{2},ν) is the χ^{2} distribution function of ν events where
In our case we have a = (n − 1)/2 and b = 1/2. The incomplete beta function is then approximately given by (D.4)where (D.5)For given power n the approximation improves with increasing ξ.
In the limit y_{n} → 0 we can use the replacement (D.6)so that the mass surface density becomes (D.7)In the limit n → ∞ we have (D.8)so that the beta function becomes independent of n.
Appendix D.1: Incomplete beta function for b = 1/2
The power law approximation of the PDF at large mass surface densities for n> 1 as presented in Appendix B are valid for negligible contribution of the incomplete beta function to the mass surface density. We have seen in Fig. 4 that the power law is only a good representation for large mass surface densities and that the approximation of the PDF improves for larger n.
Figure D.1 shows the value of the incomplete beta function as given in Eq. (4) for different assumptions for the powers n and the density ratio q. As we see the value of the incomplete beta function for given q decreases for larger n. In the limit n → ∞ for given q we obtain the asymptotic value of the incomplete beta function given in the previous section. In the limit n → 1 we have (D.9)
Fig. D.1 Incomplete beta function I_{ξ}(a,b) (black contours) for a = (n − 1)/2 and b = 1/2 as function of ξ = 1 − y_{n}. The lines are labeled with the corresponding power n. The line for a power n = 3 is emphasized through a thick line. The gray lines correspond to ξ = q^{2 /n} for fixed density ratio q and varying power n. The lines are labeled with log _{10}q. The gray dashed lines are obtained using the approximation of the incomplete beta function (Eq. (D.4)). The asymptotic value of the incomplete beta function for given q in the limit n → ∞ is indicated through dotted lines. The filled circle corresponds to a power n = 3 and an overdensity of a critical stable sphere. 

Open with DEXTER 
All Tables
Coefficients of the polynomial approximation of the maximum position of the asymptotic PDF.
All Figures
Fig. 1 Normalized mass surface density X_{n} as function of 1 − y_{n} for truncated density profiles as given in Eq. (1) for various power indices n ranging from 0 to 10. The thicker lines correspond to n = 0, 1, and 3. For a fixed pressure ratio q the mass surface densities for a given power index n vary from the central value at 1 − y_{n} = q^{2 /n} to zero at the edge of the cloud where 1 − y_{n} = 1. The central values of the normalized mass surface density for various pressure ratios q are shown as thin gray lines. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 2 Profiles of the normalized mass surface density X_{n} of a truncated density profile as given in Eq. (1) for three assumptions of the pressure ratio q = p_{ext}/p_{c}. The maxima or the curves are labeled with the corresponding power index n. The profiles for n = 1 and n = 3 are enhanced with a thicker line. The dashed lines are Gaussian approximations (Eq. (A.21)) where the variance is obtained using Eq. (A.20). The profile for n = 0 need to be considered as an asymptote. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 3 PDF of the normalized mass surface density X_{n} of cylindrical clouds having a density distribution with n = 1 (gray lines) and n = 4 (black lines). The clouds have an overdensity (1 /q) of either 10 or 100. The long dashed curves show the asymptote for infinite high overdensity. The dotted lines mark the asymptotic value at the poles. The short dashed lines give the asymptotic values in the limit of high and low values of X_{n}. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 4 PDF of the normalized mass surface density X_{n} in case of spheres (top figure) and the asymptotic PDF in case of cylinders (bottom figure) with a truncated radial density profile given by Eq. (1) for various assumptions of the power n. The thin lines show at which mass surface density X_{n} at given density ratio q = ρ(r_{cl}) /ρ_{c} the PDF corresponding to a certain power n truncates (for spheres) or has a pole (for cylinders). The lines are labeled with log _{10}q. The dashed lines show the asymptotic behavior at large and small X_{n}. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 5 Maxima position of the PDF of the parameter y_{n} and the normalized mass surface density X_{n} for spheres (top) and cylinders (bottom) as function of the power n (dotted curves). Black lines correspond to the linear PDF and the gray lines to logarithmic PDF. The solid curves are polynomial fits to the accurate position values. The values for isothermal selfgravitating spheres (n = 2 and n = 3) and cylinders (n = 4) are shown as small diamonds. The asymptotic behavior of [X_{n}] _{max} = 1/(1 − n) for n → 0 for cylinders is shown as dashed line. Asymptotes described in Appendix C.1.1 are shown as dashed lines. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. D.1 Incomplete beta function I_{ξ}(a,b) (black contours) for a = (n − 1)/2 and b = 1/2 as function of ξ = 1 − y_{n}. The lines are labeled with the corresponding power n. The line for a power n = 3 is emphasized through a thick line. The gray lines correspond to ξ = q^{2 /n} for fixed density ratio q and varying power n. The lines are labeled with log _{10}q. The gray dashed lines are obtained using the approximation of the incomplete beta function (Eq. (D.4)). The asymptotic value of the incomplete beta function for given q in the limit n → ∞ is indicated through dotted lines. The filled circle corresponds to a power n = 3 and an overdensity of a critical stable sphere. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (fulltext article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 4896 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.