Issue 
A&A
Volume 563, March 2014



Article Number  A17  
Number of page(s)  5  
Section  Astrophysical processes  
DOI  https://doi.org/10.1051/00046361/201323334  
Published online  26 February 2014 
Model for an optically thick torus in local thermodynamic equilibrium around a black hole
Università di TrentoLaboratorio di Matematica Applicata,
via Messiano 77,
38123
Trento,
Italy
email:
olindo.zanotti@unitn.it
Received:
24
December
2013
Accepted:
23
January
2014
We propose a simple model for an optically thick radiative torus in local thermodynamic equilibrium around a Kerr black hole. The hydrodynamics structure, which is not affected by the radiation field, is the same as for the socalled polish doughnuts. Under the assumption of isentropic fluid and polytropic equation of state, a simple stationary and axisymmetric solution to the relativistic radiation hydrodynamics equations is possible, for which the temperature of the torus scales like the specific enthalpy. The astrophysical relevance of the model is briefly discussed.
Key words: black hole physics / relativistic processes / radiation mechanisms: thermal
© ESO, 2014
1. Introduction
Relativistic radiation hydrodynamics provides the natural framework of several highenergy astrophysical processes, essentially all those for which the interaction of photons with matter takes place in a strong gravity regime or in the presence of relativistic motions. One such relativistic system is represented by geometrically thick disks (tori) around black holes. Considered as inviscid purely fluid solutions, these objects have always attracted much interest, partly because they allow for relatively simple analytic or semianalytic configurations (Fishbone & Moncrief 1976; Abramowicz et al. 1978; Kozlowski et al. 1978; Font & Daigne 2002; Daigne & Font 2004; Qian et al. 2009; Penna et al. 2013) and partly because they can be adopted to study various types of fluid instabilities and potentially observable physical effects in the vicinity of black holes (Abramowicz et al. 1980, 1983; Papaloizou & Pringle 1984; Abramowicz et al. 1998; Rezzolla et al. 2003; Zanotti et al. 2003; Blaes et al. 2006; Montero et al. 2010). Moreover, a renewed interest for them has been motivated by the outcome of recent numerical simulations in full general relativity, showing that highdensity tori are indeed produced after the merger of unequalmass neutron star binaries that form a black hole (Rezzolla et al. 2010).
In spite of all these analyses, and although tori have been extensively studied in numerical simulations also for the effects of magnetic fields (Villiers & Hawley 2003; Komissarov 2006; Fragile & Meier 2009; Barkov & Baushev 2011; Narayan et al. 2012; McKinney et al. 2012), the role of radiation fields has often been disregarded. This has certainly been due to the complexity inherent in the timedependent solution of the relativistic radiation hydrodynamics equations, which, at a rigorous level, would require the solution of the Boltzmann equation for the distribution function of photons^{1}. For this reason, a few more pragmatic approaches have been developed over the years, which become useful both from a theoretical and from a numerical point of view. Perhaps the most successful one is represented by the socalled projected symmetric tracefree (PSTF) moment formalism of Thorne (1981), which defines the moments of the radiation field similarly to how density, momentum and pressure of a fluid are defined as moments of the corresponding distribution function.
In the recent past, by adopting this procedure, a number of timedependent numerical codes have been developed and subsequently applied to various scenarios related to accretion flows in a relativistic context (Shapiro 1996; Farris et al. 2008; Zanotti et al. 2011; Fragile et al. 2012; Roedig et al. 2012; Sa¸dowski et al. 2013; Takahashi & Ohsuga 2013). Sadowski et al. (2014), in particular, have studied the supercritical accretion onto a black hole from a radiative torus, showing that most of the luminosity emerges through the funnels and confirmed, broadly speaking, the physical importance of these objects for highenergy astrophysics after so many years of active research.
The goal of this paper is to provide a simple model for an optically thick radiative torus around a black hole. Local thermodynamic equilibrium is assumed, and it is shown that a radiation field can be added while keeping the underlying hydrodynamic solution unmodified. The new model can be useful both on theoretical grounds, for clarifying the physics of radiative tori, and on numerical grounds, since it offers a test for general relativistic radiation codes in the optically thick regime. However, the timedependent numerical investigation and the study of the stability properties of the proposed model are not the focus of this work and will be considered elsewhere.
In the following, we set the speed of light c = 1, and the gravitational constant G = 1. We extend the geometric units by setting m_{p}/k_{B} = 1, where m_{p} is the mass of the proton, while k_{B} is the Boltzmann constant. However, we have maintained c in an explicit form in expressions of particular physical interest.
2. Physics of the model
2.1. Basics assumptions
We considered a stationary and axisymmetric spacetime around a Kerr black hole, which may be written either in BoyerLindquist or in KerrSchild coordinates. The energymomentum tensor of the system is given by (1)which clearly contains two contribution. The first term is due to matter and can be written as (2)where g^{αβ} is the metric of the background spacetime, u^{α} is the fourvector velocity of the fluid, while ρ, h = 1 + ϵ + p/ρ, ϵ and p are the restmass density, the specific (i.e. per unit mass) enthalpy, the specific internal energy, and the pressure, respectively. For the time being, we keep the equation of state unspecified. The fluid is in circular motion around the black hole and its fourvector velocity is u^{α} = u^{t}(1,0,0,Ω), where Ω = u^{φ}/u^{t} is the angular velocity as observed from infinity.
The second contribution to the energymomentum tensor is due to the radiation field, and, in terms of its moments, can be written as (Hsieh & Spiegel 1976) (3)where the energy density, the radiation flux and the radiation stress tensor, all measured in the comoving frame of the fluid, are given by We recall that I_{ν} = I_{ν}(x^{α},N^{i},ν) is the specific (i.e. an energy flux per unit time, frequency, and solid angle) intensity of the radiation, N^{α} is the fourvector defining the photon propagation direction, dν is the infinitesimal frequency and dΩ is the infinitesimal solid angle around the direction of propagation. Finally, h^{αβ} = u^{α}u^{β} + g^{αβ} is the projector operator into the space orthogonal to the fourvelocity u^{α}. In full generality, the fourforce density of the radiation field, which describes the interaction of radiation with matter, is given by (Mihalas & Mihalas 1984; Shapiro 1996) (7)where and are the total opacity and emissivity coefficients, each containing a thermal contribution, indicated with superscript t, and a scattering contribution, indicated with superscript s. However, if additionally assume that the fluid is optically thick and in local thermodynamic equilibrium with the radiation, then the radiation fourforce vanishes, and the energy density is just , where is the equilibrium blackbody intensity, T is the local temperature of the fluid, and a_{rad} is the radiation constant. Under these conditions, the radiation is isotropic in the comoving frame of the fluid, the radiation pressure is and the radiation fluxes also vanish (Farris et al. 2008). As a result, the energymomentum tensor (3) of the radiation field reduces to (8)
2.2. Description of the model
Main parameters of a few representative tori in local thermodynamic equilibrium with a radiation field.
We searched for a stationary, that is, ∂_{t} ≡ 0, and axisymmetric, that is, ∂_{φ} ≡ 0, solution to the full set of equations describing the dynamics of the system, that is,
The continuity equation is of course trivially satisfied when the velocity field is purely toroidal. In addition, since local thermodynamic equilibrium is assumed, and the radiation fourforce vanishes, Eq. (10) effectively decouples into (12)and (13)which must be satisfied separately. From (12), after contracting with the operator h^{αβ}, we can write the Euler equation in the form (Abramowicz et al. 1978) (14)where the last term is the fouracceleration of the fluid in circular motion. This equation was extensively studied in the context of geometrically thick disks around black holes, and depending on the specific^{2} angular momentum ℓ = −u_{φ}/u_{t}, different classes of equilibrium tori can be obtained^{3} whose structure and properties have been discussed in detail (Abramowicz et al. 1978; Kozlowski et al. 1978; Font & Daigne 2002; Daigne & Font 2004). Here we investigate the possibility of adding an optically thick radiation field to those solutions without affecting their hydrodynamics. This extension is possible, but only for a limited class of equations of state. First of all, we contract Eq. (13) with h^{αβ} to find, after a few tensor operations, that (15)To make (14) and (15) compatible, it must be (16)We now need to address the thermodynamic properties of the fluid. We limited our attention to isentropic fluids, for which dp = ρdh. This has two important consequences. The first one is that the specific enthalpy can be computed as (17)which follows from the second equality of Eq. (14) after introducing the potential as (Kozlowski et al. 1978) (18)Note that subscript in refers to the inner edge of the disk in the equatorial plane, where h_{in} = 1. The second consequence of the isentropic assumption is that Eq. (16) can be integrated to give (19)where is the energy density of the radiation field at r = r_{in}, while T_{in} is the surface temperature. Equation (19) poses some restrictions on the equations of state that can be accepted. For instance, an ideal fluid equation of state p = ρϵ(γ − 1), for which T = p/ρ and h = 1 + γ/(γ − 1)T, would imply a constant temperature from Eq. (19). This is clearly not acceptable, since p/ρ is not uniform within the torus. Hence, we need an equation of state for which the temperature is a free parameter. This is the case of the polytropic equation of state (20)where K is the polytropic constant and Γ is the adiabatic index of the polytrope. We stress that the equation of state of isentropic polytropes can still be written formally like p = ρϵ(Γ−1). However, there are two important differences with respect to the equation of state of an ideal fluid, even when the latter is isentropic. The first difference is that the exponent Γ of Eq. (20) is not necessarily given by the ratio of the specific heats at constant pressure and at constant volume. The second difference is that for polytropes like (20), the temperature T is not necessarily given by the ratio p/ρ and can therefore be regarded as a free parameter^{4}. It is interesting to note that while a purely hydrodynamic torus is compatible with the ideal fluid equation of state, in which case its temperature is given by p/ρ, the radiation hydrodynamic torus that we are describing is not.
After adopting the equation of state (20), Eq. (19) can be used to fix the temperature of the torus as (21)Hence, the isocurves of the temperature T and those of the specific enthalpy h of the torus coincide.
A wellknown property of polish doughnuts is that they possess an internal Keplerian point, r_{c}, lying on the equatorial plane, where the restmass density reaches a maximum ρ_{c}. This also corresponds to the highest temperature of the torus, and the ratio of the central to the surface temperature is given by (22)We note that the surface temperature T_{in}, or, alternatively, the central temperature T_{c}, is the only missing parameter that must be specified in addition to those necessary for constructing the hydrodynamic model. We also stress that since the temperature scales like the specific enthalpy, and the specific enthalpy is given by Eq. (17), the temperature does not depend on the polytropic constant K or on the index of the polytrope Γ. This is reminiscent of a similar result originally proved by Rezzolla et al. (2003) for purely hydrodynamic relativistic tori, namely that they have ratios p/ρ, which do not depend on the polytropic constant K.
Finally, a consistency check can be performed to show that even in the presence of a temperature gradient, the relativistic radiation flux is zero. In fact, in the framework of Eckart’s formulation of relativistic standard irreversible thermodynamics (Eckart 1940), the flux is given by the relativistic form of Fourier’s law, namely (Israel 1976) (23)where λ is the thermal conductivity. It is easy to see that if the fourvector acceleration is given by the righthand side of Eq. (15), as given by Eq. (23) is indeed zero.
2.3. A few representative examples
As a first illustrative example, we consider a Schwarzschild spacetime with the fluid having a constant (in radius) specific angular momentum ℓ. In these circumstances the restmass density distribution can be solved analytically and is (Font & Daigne 2002) (24)where (25)is the potential. If we fix the position of the inner edge of torus r_{in} at the position of the cusp r_{cusp} of the potential , the torus will exactly fill its Roche lobe. Under this assumption, we have considered a few tori orbiting around a M = 2.5 M_{⊙} black hole. The first four rows of Table 1 report four models previously considered by Zanotti et al. (2003) in the Schwarzschild spacetime, but without the radiation field^{5}. All the models have the same disktohole mass ratio M_{t}/M = 0.1, but different sizes. The last column reports the ratio T_{c}/T_{in}, computed according to Eq. (22). As can be seen, tori that are in local thermodynamic equilibrium and obey Eq. (19) are close to be isothermal, with deviations from T = const that increase as the inner edge of the torus approaches the black hole.
The property of being almost isothermal remains true also when powerlaw distributions of the specific angular momentum are adopted, namely when , although a richer phenomenology is possible for them^{6}. We recall that in the Kerr metric the radius r_{ms} of the marginally stable orbit is a decreasing function of the blackhole spin parameter a. On the other hand, when the power lawindex q is increased, the inner radius of the torus increases as well. Hence, for low values of q, the torus penetrates deeper into the potential well, placing the cusp below the marginally stable orbit. In these circumstances the highest values of T_{c}/T_{in} are found. The last two rows of Table 1 report two representative models of this class, which were previously considered by Zanotti et al. (2005) in Kerr spacetime, but without the radiation field.^{7}
In contrast, when the exponent q is close to 1/2, the rotation law tends to the Keplerian one, with a torus that flattens toward the equatorial plane. Tori of this kind are generally much larger than ℓ = const tori (Zanotti et al. 2010), with radii at the maximum restmass density point as high as r_{c} ~ 1000. Consequently, they are very mildly relativistic, with values of the specific enthalpy h_{c} very close to unity. We have verified this trend for a few representative cases, not reported in Table 1, and found that T_{c}/T_{in} ≈ 1 to a few parts over 10^{6}.
3. Discussion and conclusions
We have shown that purely hydrodynamical geometrically thick disks around a black hole, extensively studied in the past and sometimes referred to as polish doughnuts, can be dressed with a radiation field in local thermodynamic equilibrium with the fluid. The equation of state required for this extension is that of an isentropic and polytropic fluid, with a temperature that scales like the specific enthalpy. The resulting models, computed for a few representative cases of both constant and varying distributions of the specific angular momentum, are almost isothermal, with deviations of only a few percent.
Since the equation of state of the model is nonthermal and wellsuited to describe degenerate matter, the most natural astrophysical scenario where such a model can become relevant is that of a highdensity torus, with densities close to those of neutron stars. Although still rather simplified, these models may indeed offer a better description of highdensity tori produced after the merger of unequalmass neutron star binaries collapsing onto a black hole, as reported by fully relativistic and purely hydrodynamical numerical simulations (Rezzolla et al. 2010). This marks an important difference with respect to the radiation torus discussed in McKinney et al. (2014), which adopts a thermal equation of state and is instead wellsuited to describe (much) lower density accretion disks around black holes.
The model discussed here may also offer a stationary test for numerical codes that solve the equations of general relativistic radiation hydrodynamics. However, a few words of caution need to be said in this respect. The first warning is that since the torus is isentropic, the evolution should preferably be performed without integrating the energy density of the fluid, which can be computed algebraically from the remaining quantities by exploiting Eq. (20). Secondly, since the opacity is typically a function of the restmass density, which drops at the surface of the torus, the assumption of rigorous optical thickness is likely to fail in a thin shell at the surface of the torus. However, this problem is mitigated by the possibility of building models for which such a shell is arbitrarily thin. Thirdly, any modern numerical code for the solution of the general relativistic radiation hydrodynamics equations will require the treatment of a tenuous “atmosphere”, that is, of a lowdensity region filling the supposedly vacuum space around the torus. The atmosphere is intrinsically optically thin and this requires a code capable of handling both the optically thick and the optically thin regimes. Significant progress in this respect has recently been obtained by Sa¸dowski et al. (2013); Takahashi & Ohsuga (2013); McKinney et al. (2014).
Finally, the stability properties of these new models and their response to perturbations remain an open question, which may deserve a dedicated investigation, both analytical and numerical.
See McClarren & Hauck (2010) and Radice et al. (2013) for some promising progress in this direction.
See Rezzolla & Zanotti (2013) for a pedagogic exposition.
A famous example is given by the degenerate Fermi fluid, whose equation of state can be written like Eq. (20).
Models (a)–(d) in Table 1 are the same as models (e)–(h) of Zanotti et al. (2003).
See Daigne & Font (2004) for an extended discussion about tori with a powerlaw distribution of the specific angular momentum.
Models (e)–(f) in Table 1 are the same as models (D2a) and (E1a) of Zanotti et al. (2005).
Acknowledgments
I thank John C. Miller and the referee Jonathan McKinney for very useful suggestions that helped me to improve the quality of the manuscript. This work has been financed in parts by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/20072013) in the frame of the research project STiMulUs, ERC Grant agreement No. 278267.
References
 Abramowicz, M., Jaroszynski, M., & Sikora, M. 1978, A&A, 63, 221 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Abramowicz, M. A., Calvani, M., & Nobili, L. 1980, ApJ, 242, 772 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Abramowicz, M. A., Calvani, M., & Nobili, L. 1983, Nature, 302, 597 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Abramowicz, M. A., Karas, V., & Lanza, A. 1998, A&A, 331, 1143 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Barkov, M. V., & Baushev, A. N. 2011, New Astron., 16, 46 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Blaes, O. M., Arras, P., & Fragile, P. C. 2006, MNRAS, 369, 1235 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Daigne, F., & Font, J. A. 2004, MNRAS, 349, 841 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Eckart, C. 1940, Phys. Rev., 58, 919 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Farris, B. D., Li, T. K., Liu, Y. T., & Shapiro, S. L. 2008, Phys. Rev. D, 78, 024023 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Fishbone, L. G., & Moncrief, V. 1976, ApJ, 207, 962 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Font, J. A., & Daigne, F. 2002, MNRAS, 334, 383 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Fragile, P. C., & Meier, D. L. 2009, ApJ, 693, 771 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Fragile, P. C., Gillespie, A., Monahan, T., Rodriguez, M., & Anninos, P. 2012, ApJS, 201, 9 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Hsieh, S., & Spiegel, E. A. 1976, ApJ, 207, 244 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Israel, W. 1976, Ann. Phys., 100, 310 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
 Komissarov, S. S. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 993 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Kozlowski, M., Jaroszynski, M., & Abramowicz, M. A. 1978, A&A, 63, 209 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 McClarren, R. G., & Hauck, C. D. 2010, J. Comput. Phys., 229, 5597 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 McKinney, J. C., Tchekhovskoy, A., & Blandford, R. D. 2012, MNRAS, 423, 3083 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 McKinney, J. C., Tchekhovskoy, A., Sadowski, A., & Narayan, R. 2014, MNRAS, submitted [arXiv:1312.6127] [Google Scholar]
 Mihalas, D., & Mihalas, B. 1984, Foundations of radiation hydrodynamics (New York: Oxford University Press) [Google Scholar]
 Montero, P. J., Font, J. A., & Shibata, M. 2010, Phys. Rev. Lett., 104, 191101 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 Narayan, R., SÄ dowski, A., Penna, R. F., & Kulkarni, A. K. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 3241 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Papaloizou, J. C. B., & Pringle, J. E. 1984, MNRAS, 208, 721 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Penna, R. F., Kulkarni, A., & Narayan, R. 2013, A&A, 559, A116 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Qian, L., Abramowicz, M. A., Fragile, P. C., et al. 2009, A&A, 498, 471 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Radice, D., Abdikamalov, E., Rezzolla, L., & Ott, C. D. 2013, J. Comp. Phys., 242, 648 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Rezzolla, L., & Zanotti, O. 2013, Relativistic Hydrodynamics (Oxford: Oxford University Press) [Google Scholar]
 Rezzolla, L., Yoshida, S., & Zanotti, O. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 978 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Rezzolla, L., Baiotti, L., Giacomazzo, B., Link, D., & Font, J. A. 2010, Class. Quant. Grav., 27, 114105 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Roedig, C., Zanotti, O., & Alic, D. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 1613 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Sądowski, A., Narayan, R., Tchekhovskoy, A., & Zhu, Y. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 3533 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Sadowski, A., Narayan, R., McKinney, J. C., & Tchekhovskoy, A. 2014, MNRAS, submitted [arXiv:1311.5900] [Google Scholar]
 Shapiro, S. L. 1996, ApJ, 472, 308 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Takahashi, H. R., & Ohsuga, K. 2013, ApJ, 772, 127 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Thorne, K. S. 1981, MNRAS, 194, 439 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Villiers, J. P. D., & Hawley, J. F. 2003, ApJ, 592, 1060 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Zanotti, O., Rezzolla, L., & Font, J. A. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 832 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Zanotti, O., Font, J. A., Rezzolla, L., & Montero, P. J. 2005, MNRAS, 356, 1371 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Zanotti, O., Rezzolla, L., DelZanna, L., & Palenzuela, C. 2010, A&A, 523, A8 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Zanotti, O., Roedig, C., Rezzolla, L., & Del Zanna, L. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 2899 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
All Tables
Main parameters of a few representative tori in local thermodynamic equilibrium with a radiation field.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (fulltext article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 4896 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.