Free Access

This article has an erratum: [https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322042e]


Table 4

Scanned parameter space of our temperature-gradient modeling, with the corresponding mathematical best-fit parameters for the two models considered here: one-component and two-component disk models.

Model Scan range Surface density Δrhot log (ϵ) r in T in q
[AU] [AU] [K]

Wide N/A N/A [0.2−8] [100−1500] [0.5−1.5]
low N/A N/A [2.6−3.2] [400−750] [0.5−0.9]
Narrow medium N/A N/A [2.6−3.2] [350−650] [0.5−0.9]
high N/A N/A [2.6−3.2] [300−600] [0.5−0.8]
One-component disk low N/A N/A 2.79 ± 0.06 669 ± 24 0.74 ± 0.06 3.2
Best-fit medium N/A N/A 2.78 ± 0.09 478 ± 12 0.66 ± 0.06 3.0
high N/A N/A 2.77 ± 0.09 421 ± 9 0.62 ± 0.06 3.4

Wide [0.05−2.0] [(−4)−0] [2−7] [200−700] [0.5−1.5]
low [1.4−2.1] [(−3)−(−2.5) [5.4−6.2] [400−500] [0.6−1.0]
Narrow medium [1.5−2.2] [(−3.1)−(−2.5)] [5.4−6.2] [320−420] [0.7−1.1]
Two-component disk high [1.6−2.3] [(−3.1)−(−2.5)] [5.4−6.2] [280−380] [0.7−1.1]
low 1.66 ± 0.12 −2.78 ± 0.10 5.60 ± 0.10 445 ± 33 0.78 ± 0.18 1.60
Best-fit medium 2.04 ± 0.21 −2.87 ± 0.12 5.61 ± 0.12 365 ± 19 0.97 ± 0.21 1.04
high 2.13 ± 0.12 −2.87 ± 0.06 5.63 ± 0.12 332 ± 9 1.04 ± 0.15 0.95

Notes.We also show the reduced χ2 value of the best-fit models () and the 3σ errors on the parameters.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.