Table 5
List of stars with overestimated PMs.
| Star ID | PM(RA, Dec) | PM(RA, Dec) | Ref. | Sp. | Ref. | ||
| [mas yr-1], this work | [mas yr-1], literature | Type | |||||
|
|
|||||||
| C* 1925 | −1.3 ± 12.0 | 25.6 ± 10.6 | 256 ± 110 | 342 ± 40 | (1) | Carbon star | (2) |
| C* 1930 | 10.6 ± 7.1 | −10.3 ± 3.3 | 18 ± 91 | 278 ± 46 | (1) | Carbon star | (2) |
| C* 1936 | 5.9 ± 7.6 | −6.5 ± 11.6 | 146 ± 44 | 226 ± 7 | (1) | Carbon star | (2) |
| CD−60 4613 | −3.7 ± 13.6 | −8.2 ± 6.7 | −251 ± 25 | −23 ± 25 | (3) | ||
| −8.65 ± 6.92 | −8.27 ± 6.40 | (4) | |||||
| −7.23 ± 2.2 | −0.35 ± 2.2 | (5) | |||||
| −7.38 ± 1.07 | −1.76 ± 1.04 | (9) | |||||
| LP 866−17 | −8.2 ± 0.2 | −3.4 ± 3.4 | −7.4 ± 5.5 | −216.9 ± 5.5 | (6) | ||
| −16.1 ± 4.4 | −19.1 ± 4.3 | (5) | |||||
| OGLE BUL−SC20 625107 | −162.0 ± 4.2 | −117.5 ± 2.6 | −42.56 ± 6.96 | −330.93 ± 32.81 | (7) | ||
| OGLE BUL−SC21 298351 | 8.1 ± 1.5 | −10.4 ± 1.5 | 29.48 ± 13.96 | −262.32 ± 28.43 | (7) | ||
| 0.2 ± 4.4 | −0.2 ± 4.4 | (5) | |||||
| −5.9 ± 12.3 | −8.1 ± 12.2 | (8) | |||||
| OGLE BUL−SC32 388121 | 11.1 ± – | 5.0 ± – | −78.63 ± 6.88 | −183.12 ± 6.66 | (7) | ||
| −116 ± 2 | −574 ± 112 | (1) | |||||
| −114.6 ± 9.5 | −579.6 ± 9.5 | (5) | |||||
| 24.9 ± 7.4 | −18.7 ± 11.6 | (8) | |||||
Notes. The first literature PM is the one listed in SIMBAD at the time of the sample preparation.
Reference. (1) Monet et al. (2003); (2) Westerlund (1971); (3) Turon et al. (1992); (4) Perryman (1997); (5) Röser et al. (2010); (6) Salim & Gould (2003); (7) Sumi et al. (2004); (8) Zacharias et al. (2013); (9) van Leeuwen (2007).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.