Table A.1
Effects of changing the member selection method (Clean vs. P+G).
| Method | Sample | Clean/P+G |
|
|
||
| Quantity: r200 | ||
| From σlos | R ≤ 1.98 Mpc (passive only) | 1.07 ± 0.07 |
| MAMPOSSt | 0.05 ≤ R ≤ 1.96 Mpc | 1.04 ± 0.12 |
| Caustic | R ≤ 2 × 1.96 Mpc | 1.03 ± 0.22 |
| Quantity: r-2 | ||
| MAMPOSSt | 0.05 ≤ R ≤ 1.96 Mpc | 0.80 ± 1.14 |
| Caustic | R ≤ 2 × 1.96 Mpc | 1.00 ± 0.53 |
| Quantity: rν | ||
| – | R ≤ 1.96 Mpc | 0.96 ± 0.20 |
| – | R ≤ 1.96 Mpc (passive only) | 0.91 ± 0.19 |
| – | R ≤ 1.96 Mpc (SF only) | 1.10 ± 0.37 |
Notes.We list the values of the ratios of several quantities, r200,r-2,rν, obtained using the samples of cluster members identified by the Clean and P+G method, respectively. We also list 1σ errors on these ratios.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.