Free Access

Table 5

Confidence intervals for data obtained with the VLT by King et al. (2012).

cosθ n Reported interval Confidence interval β for α = 0.05
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

0.248 26 (−0.37,0.77) (−4.55 × 10-2,1.02) 0.91
0.519 17 (9.99 × 10-2,0.70) (−0.26,1.21) 0.75
0.368 18 (−0.54,0.61) (−0.47,0.27) 0.74
0.330 30 (−1.94,0.46) (−0.23,0.42) 0.77
0.552 9 (−0.49,0.56) (−0.55,1.69) 0.82
0.567 11 (−1.01,0.61) (−0.75,1.25) 0.79
0.266 31 (−0.68,0.15) (1.18 × 10-2,0.98) 0.90
5.047 × 10-2 7 (−5.87 × 10-2,0.62) (−0.85,1.21) 0.91
0.497 10 (−2.30, − 0.70) (−0.59,1.52) 0.84
0.372 18 (0.28,0.59) (−0.47,0.27) 0.74

Notes. Comparison with single quasar obtained with the VLT by Srianand (2013, priv. comm.). Data sets are selected according to angular position. Columns:

(1)

cosθ from data obtained by Srianand (2013, priv. comm.);

(2)

number of data reported by King et al. (2012) inside the interval;

(3)

single value reported by Srianand (2013, priv. comm.) in units of 10-5;

(4)

calculated confidence interval from a group of data reported by King et al. (2012) in units of 10-5;

(5)

type II error probability.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.