Table 1
Initial selection of Compton-thick candidates based on XMM-Newton absorbed power-law, (PLCABS), spectral fits.
| PID | LID | XID | z | N H | Γ | EW | c-stat | N H | Flux |
|
|
Ref. | |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | (11) | (12) | (13) | |
|
|
|||||||||||||
| 48 | 334 | 198 | 0.2981 |
|
|
|
2909/2498 |
|
40.0 | 0.68 | 0.88 | – | |
| 66 | 126 | 191 | 1.1852 |
|
|
|
3015/2498 |
|
1.2 | 1.5 | 2.2 | – | |
| 144 | 265 | 412 | 3.7002 |
|
|
|
2845/2498 |
|
1.55 | 3.7 | 40 | (a), (c), (d), (e) | |
| 147 | 176 | 257 | 1.5372 |
|
|
|
2881/2498 |
|
6.3 | 2.2 | 3.5 | (a), (b), (d) | |
| 214 | 55 | 83 | 2.003 |
|
|
|
2874/2498 |
|
19 | 6.1 | 8.0 | – | |
| 222 | 428 | 686 | 0.4242 |
|
|
<0.27 | 2896/2498 |
|
7.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | – | |
| 245 | 184 | 22 | 2.683 |
|
|
<0.62 | 2820/2498 |
|
3.0 | 1.5 | 5.0 | (e) | |
| 289 | 128 | 193 | 0.6072 |
|
|
|
2850/2498 |
|
15.9 | 1.2 | 1.4 | – | |
| 324 | 398 | 634 | 1.2222 | < 0.63 |
|
|
2940/2498 |
|
3.6 | 1.2 | 1.2 | (f) | |
Notes.The columns are: (1) XMM-Newton ID. (2) Chandra ID from Luo et al. (2008). (3) Chandra ID from Xue et al. (2011). (4) Redshift; two or three decimal digits denote X-ray or spectroscopic redshift, respectively; references: (1)Balestra et al. (2010), (2)Szokoly et al. (2004), (3) X-ray redshift from current work. (5) NH column density in units of 1022 cm-2. (6) Photon index. (7) FeKα equivalent-width in units of keV; the energy of the line has been fixed at a rest-frame energy of 6.4 keV. (8) c-statistic value/degrees of freedom. (9) Column density in units of 1022 cm-2. for a photon-index fixed at Γ = 1.8. (10) 2–10 keV flux in units of 10-15 erg cm-2 s-1. (11) 2–10 keV obscured luminosity in units of 1043 erg s-1. (12) Unobscured luminosity (estimated by removing the absorption component) in units of 1043 erg s-1. The flux and luminosities are derived leaving Γ free. (13) previous X-ray reference: (a) Tozzi et al. (2006); (b) Georgantopoulos et al. (2007); (c) Norman et al. (2002); (d) Comastri et al. (2011); (e) Iwasawa et al. (2012a); (f) Georgantopoulos et al. (2011b). All errors refer to the 90% confidence level.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.