Table 5
Comparison of RVs obtained with by Nidever et al. (2002) and Chubak et al. (2012) and those presented here, according to the templates they used.
| Source | Stat | Sun template | M-dwarf template |
|
|
|||
| Chubak et al. | N∗ | 326 | 29 |
| No | 15 | 0 | |
| ΔRV | 63 | –98 | |
| rms | 100 | 182 | |
|
|
|||
| Nidever et al. | N∗ | 308 | 28 |
| No | 22 | 0 | |
| ΔRV | 72 | –141 | |
| rms | 33 | 178 | |
Notes.Differences, ΔRV = RVS − RVCHUBAK/NIDEVER (Fig. 7) and rms scatter in m s-1 are derived with an iterative clipping at a 3σ level. N∗ is the number of stars in common, No is the number of outliers removed.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.