Free Access
Table 5
Comparison of bulge, disc, and DM halo mass estimates.
| Model | M bulge | M disc | M 200 |
|
|
|||
| Geehan et al. (2006), best-fit (maximum-disc) model | 3.3 | 8.4 (13.7) | 68 (94) |
| Seigar et al. (2008), model without (with) adiabatic contraction | 3.5 (3.5) | 5.8 (7.3) | 73 (89) |
| Chemin et al. (2009), “hybrid” model | 2.32 | 7.1 | 100 |
| Corbelli et al. (2010), NFW model with (M/L)bulge = (M/L)disc | 3.8 | 8.8 | 85c |
| This work, B07 model | 4.4a | 5.7b | 113 |
| This work, maximum-stellar model | 6.6a | 8.6b | 127 |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.