Table 4
Supernova rates in the literature.
⟨z⟩ | RIa/CC × 10-4 | Reference |
|
||
Ia Supernovae | ||
<0.0066 (<28 Mpc) | ≥0.35 | Smartt et al. (2009)∗ |
0.01 |
![]() |
Cappellaro et al. (1999) |
<0.014 (<60 Mpc) | ![]() ![]() |
Li et al. (2011) |
0.1 | ![]() ![]() |
Dilday et al. (2010) |
0.15 | ![]() ![]() |
Dilday et al. (2010) |
0.15 | ![]() ![]() |
Rodney & Tonry (2010) |
0.2 | ![]() ![]() |
Dilday et al. (2010) |
0.25 | ![]() ![]() |
Dilday et al. (2010) |
0.3 | ![]() ![]() |
Dilday et al. (2010) |
0.3 | ![]() ![]() |
Botticella (2008) |
0.35 | ![]() ![]() |
Rodney & Tonry (2010) |
0.442 | ![]() ![]() |
Barbary et al. (2012) |
0.45 | ![]() ![]() |
Rodney & Tonry (2010) |
0.47 | ![]() ![]() |
Neill et al. (2006) |
0.47 | ![]() ![]() |
Dahlen et al. (2008) |
0.55 | ![]() ![]() |
Pain et al. (2002)* |
0.55 | ![]() ![]() |
Rodney & Tonry (2010) |
0.62 | 1.29![]() ![]() |
SVISS (this work) |
0.65 | ![]() ![]() |
Rodney & Tonry (2010) |
0.74 |
![]() |
Graur et al. (2011), errors include systematics |
0.75 | ![]() ![]() |
Rodney & Tonry (2010) |
0.807 | ![]() ![]() |
Barbary et al. (2012) |
0.83 | ![]() ![]() |
Dahlen et al. (2008) |
0.85 | ![]() ![]() |
Rodney & Tonry (2010) |
0.95 | ![]() ![]() |
Rodney & Tonry (2010) |
1.05 | ![]() ![]() |
Rodney & Tonry (2010) |
1.187 | ![]() ![]() |
Barbary et al. (2012) |
1.21 | ![]() ![]() |
Dahlen et al. (2008) |
1.23 |
![]() |
Graur et al. (2011), errors include systematics |
1.535 | ![]() ![]() |
Barbary et al. (2012) |
1.61 | ![]() ![]() |
Dahlen et al. (2008) |
1.69 |
![]() |
Graur et al. (2011), errors include systematics |
|
||
CC Supernovae | ||
≲0.003 (<11 Mpc) | ≥![]() |
Botticella et al. (2012)*, stat. errors only |
~0.003 (6–15 Mpc) | ≥![]() |
Mattila et al. (2012)∗, stat. errors only |
<0.0066 (<28 Mpc) | ≥0.88 | Smartt et al. (2009)* |
0.01 |
![]() |
Cappellaro et al. (1999) |
<0.014 (<60 Mpc) | ![]() ![]() |
Li et al. (2011) |
0.21 | ![]() ![]() |
Botticella et al. (2008) |
0.3 | ![]() ![]() |
Bazin et al. (2009) |
0.3 | ![]() ![]() |
Dahlen et al. (2004) |
0.39 | ![]() ![]() |
SVISS (this work) |
0.66 |
![]() |
Graur et al. (2011), errors include systematics |
0.7 | ![]() ![]() |
Dahlen et al. (2004) |
0.73 | ![]() ![]() |
SVISS (this work) |
Notes. ⟨z⟩ is the average redshift for the
redshift interval, as given in the respective paper. The supernova rates
RIa/CC are in units of
yr-1 . Errors
are statistical (systematical) unless otherwise noted. The rates are corrected for
extinction given in the original reference. In a few cases (references marked with
∗) no extinction correction have been done. The local CC rates
(papers by Botticella and Mattila) have been measured in small volumes and are
likely dominated by a local overdensity of star formation.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.