Table 1
WASP-43 b photometric eclipse time-series used in this work.
Date | Instrument | Filter | Np | Epoch | Baseline | σ | σ120s | βw | βr | CF |
function | [%] | [%] | ||||||||
|
||||||||||
06 Dec. 2010 | TRAPPIST | I+z | 393 | 11 | p(t2) | 0.35, 0.36 | 0.14, 0.17 | 1.26, 1.30 | 1.00, 1.90 | 1.26, 2.47 |
09 Dec. 2010 | VLT/HAWK-I | NB2090 | 183 | 13.5 | p(t2) + p(l1) + p(xy1) | 0.055, 0.055 | 0.036, 0.036 | 1.04, 1.04 | 1.09, 1.14 | 1.14, 1.18 |
15 Dec. 2010 | TRAPPIST | I+z | 442 | 22 | p(t2) | 0.36, 0.36 | 0.12, 0.14 | 0.97, 0.97 | 1.03, 1.13 | 1.00, 1.10 |
19 Dec. 2010 | TRAPPIST | I+z | 480 | 27 | p(t2) | 0.27, 0.28 | 0.11, 0.12 | 1.00, 1.01 | 1.00, 1.18 | 1.00, 1.19 |
28 Dec. 2010 | TRAPPIST | I+z | 574 | 38 | p(t2) | 0.32, 0.32 | 0.12, 0.12 | 1.01, 1.02 | 1.29, 1.50 | 1.30, 1.53 |
28 Dec. 2010 | Euler | Gunn-r′ | 111 | 38 | p(t2) + p(xy2) | 0.10, 0.10 | 0.10, 0.10 | 1.54, 1.64 | 1.04, 1.15 | 1.61, 1.90 |
30 Dec. 2010 | TRAPPIST | z ′ | 332 | 40.5 | p(t2) | 0.30, 0.30 | 0.14, 0.14 | 1.04, 1.04 | 1.00, 1.00 | 1.04, 1.04 |
01 Jan. 2011 | TRAPPIST | I+z | 407 | 43 | p(t2) + p(xy2) | 0.27, 0.27 | 0.11, 0.12 | 1.00, 1.01 | 1.00, 1.00 | 1.00, 1.01 |
06 Jan. 2011 | TRAPPIST | I+z | 273 | 49 | p(t2) | 0.24, 0.24 | 0.11, 0.11 | 1.07, 1.09 | 1.00, 1.38 | 1.07, 1.50 |
09 Jan. 2011 | VLT/HAWK-I | NB1190 | 115 | 51.5 | p(t2) + p(b1) + p(xy1) | 0.087, 0.087 | 0.047, 0.048 | 2.22, 2.22 | 1.00, 1.00 | 2.22, 2.22 |
14 Jan. 2011 | TRAPPIST | I+z | 237 | 59 | p(t2) | 0.17, 0.18 | 0.09, 0.10 | 0.91, 0.93 | 1.04, 1.34 | 0.95, 1.24 |
19 Jan. 2011 | TRAPPIST | I+z | 279 | 65 | p(t2) | 0.18, 0.19 | 0.09, 0.10 | 0.91, 0.95 | 1.00, 2.16 | 0.91, 2.05 |
23 Jan. 2011 | TRAPPIST | I+z | 244 | 70 | p(t2) + p(xy2) | 0.20, 0.20 | 0.08, 0.09 | 1.02, 1.02 | 1.00, 1.00 | 1.02, 1.02 |
28 Jan. 2011 | Euler | Gunn-r′ | 114 | 76 | p(t2) + p(xy1) | 0.13, 0.13 | 0.13, 0.13 | 1.36, 1.42 | 1.17, 1.24 | 1.59, 1.76 |
06 Feb. 2011 | Euler | Gunn-r′ | 107 | 87 | p(t2) | 0.13, 0.15 | 0.13, 0.15 | 0.92, 1.07 | 1.10, 1.86 | 1.02, 1.99 |
14 Feb. 2011 | TRAPPIST | I+z | 311 | 97 | p(t2) | 0.21, 0.22 | 0.11, 0.12 | 1.05, 1.08 | 1.00, 1.42 | 1.05, 1.53 |
08 Mar. 2011 | TRAPPIST | I+z | 285 | 124 | p(t2) | 0.21, 0.22 | 0.11, 0.13 | 1.11, 1.15 | 1.00, 2.00 | 1.11, 2.30 |
10 Mar. 2011 | TRAPPIST | z ′ | 216 | 126.5 | p(t2) | 0.22, 0.22 | 0.17, 0.17 | 1.09, 1.09 | 1.00, 1.00 | 1.09, 1.09 |
21 Mar. 2011 | TRAPPIST | I+z | 322 | 140 | p(t2) | 0.20, 0.21 | 0.11, 0.13 | 0.83, 0.88 | 1.20, 2.04 | 1.00, 1.80 |
22 Mar. 2011 | TRAPPIST | I+z | 237 | 141 | p(t2) | 0.21, 0.22 | 0.10, 0.11 | 1.10, 1.14 | 1.00, 1.67 | 1.11, 1.91 |
28 Mar. 2011 | TRAPPIST | z ′ | 195 | 148.5 | p(t2) | 0.28, 0.28 | 0.18, 0.18 | 0.81, 0.81 | 1.03, 1.04 | 0.84, 0.84 |
31 Mar. 2011 | TRAPPIST | I+z | 238 | 152 | p(t2) | 0.24, 0.26 | 0.12, 0.17 | 1.04, 1.15 | 1.00, 2.28 | 1.04, 2.63 |
02 Apr. 2011 | TRAPPIST | z ′ | 160 | 154.5 | p(t2) + p(b1) | 0.18, 0.18 | 0.11, 0.11 | 0.93, 0.93 | 1.27, 1.30 | 1.19, 1.21 |
13 Apr. 2011 | TRAPPIST | I+z | 293 | 168 | p(t2) + p(xy2) | 0.23, 0.23 | 0.12, 0.13 | 1.00, 1.01 | 1.00, 1.00 | 1.00, 1.01 |
17 Apr. 2011 | TRAPPIST | I+z | 289 | 173 | p(t2) | 0.26, 0.27 | 0.13, 0.15 | 1.05, 1.09 | 1.00, 1.26 | 1.05, 1.36 |
30 Apr. 2011 | TRAPPIST | I+z | 327 | 189 | p(t2) | 0.32, 0.33 | 0.16, 0.17 | 1.31, 1.33 | 1.07, 1.30 | 1.40, 1.73 |
09 May 2011 | TRAPPIST | I+z | 280 | 200 | p(t2) | 0.19, 0.20 | 0.10, 0.12 | 0.98, 1.05 | 1.00, 1.77 | 0.98, 1.85 |
11 May 2011 | TRAPPIST | z ′ | 214 | 202.5 | p(t2) | 0.21, 0.21 | 0.14, 0.14 | 1.03, 1.03 | 1.23, 1.29 | 1.27, 1.33 |
18 May 2011 | TRAPPIST | I+z | 250 | 211 | p(t2) | 0.18, 0.18 | 0.10, 0.11 | 0.93, 0.96 | 1.10, 1.48 | 1.02, 1.42 |
13 Jun. 2011 | TRAPPIST | I+z | 605 | 243 | p(t2) | 0.33, 0.34 | 0.13, 0.14 | 0.97, 0.99 | 1.25, 1.87 | 1.22, 1.84 |
Notes. For each light curve, this table shows the date of acquisition, the used instrument and filter, the number of data points, the epoch based on the transit ephemeris presented in H11, the selected baseline function (see Sect. 3.1), the standard deviation of the best-fit residuals (unbinned and binned per intervals of 2 min), and the deduced values for βw, βr, and CF = βr × βw (see Sect. 3.1). For the baseline function, p(ϵN) denotes, respectively, a N-order polynomial function of time (ϵ = t), the logarithm of time (ϵ = l), x and y positions (ϵ = xy), and background (ϵ = b). For the last five columns, the first and second value correspond, respectively, to the individual analysis of the light curve and to the global analysis of all data.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.