Table 1
Unrelaxed clusters (DARC sample).
| Name | α,δ (J2000) | z | TX | σv,tot | σv,subs | M200 | σv | R200 |
| keV | km s-1 | (km s-1) | 1015 M⊙ | (km s-1) | Mpc | |||
|
|
||||||||
| A697a | 08 42 57.55, +36 21 59.9 | 0.2815 | 10.2 | 1334 |
200, 600, 400 | 0.40 | 660 | 1.39 |
| A773b | 09 17 53.26, +51 43 36.5 | 0.2197 | 7.8 | 1394 |
950, 500 | 1.39 | 994 | 2.16 |
| A959c | 10 17 35.04, +59 33 27.7 | 0.2883 | 7.0 | 1170 |
600, 700 | 0.76 | 824 | 1.73 |
| A1240d | 11 23 37.60, +43 05 51.0 | 0.1948 | 6.0 | 870 |
700, 1000 | 1.93 | 1103 | 2.43 |
| A2219e | 16 40 19.87, +46 42 41.3 | 0.2254 | 10.3 | 1438 |
1000 | 1.41 | 1000 | 2.17 |
Notes. σv,subs from KMM4g1-2-4 in Table 4.
Ref.: Girardi et al. (2006);
Ref.: Barrena et al. (2007); σv,subs from the main and secondary subclusters in Sect. 5.
Ref.: Boschin et al. (2008); σv,subs from the averages of KMM1 and V1, and of KMM2 and V2 in Table 2. Here we do not consider the subclump V3(=KMM3=DS-NE) also detected in X-ray, which is likely in a premerging phase and not responsible for the ongoing merger.
Ref.: Barrena et al. (2009); σv,subs from A1240N and A1240S in Table 2.
Ref.: Boschin et al. (2004); σv,subs from NW in Table 2. The separation of suclumps is not obvious. Here, since the primary subclump lies to the SE of the cluster center (see also the more recent paper Million & Allen 2009), we consider the value of σv of NW sector, where the main cluster is likely free of the subclump.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.