Free Access

Table 3

Best-fit results from our simultaneous SED analysis.

Model c1 c2 c3 c4 γ xc χ2/d.o.f. Null hyp.
 = 2.09–2.84c2 prob.

FM90
All data –2.66 0.92 4.59 819.9/846 0.734
λUV > 121 nm –1.64 0.92 4.69 813.8/814 0.495

SMC
All data –4.47  ±  0.19 2.35  ±  0.18 0.08  ±  0.01 –0.22  ±  0.01 1.00 4.60 815.0/812 0.464
λUV > 121 nm 786.5/781 0.438

LMC
All data –2.16  ±  0.36 1.31  ±  0.08 1.92  ±  0.23 0.42  ±  0.08 1.05  ±  0.07 4.63  ±  0.01 818.7/812 0.428
λUV > 121 nm 795.4/781 0.352

Milky Way
All data 0.12  ±  0.11 0.63  ±  0.04 3.26  ±  0.11 0.41  ±  0.02 0.96  ±  0.01 4.60  ±  0.002 1333.1/812 5.5e-28
λUV > 121 nm 1276.3/781 1.7e-26

Notes. Table lists results from both the analysis that used all available afterglow SED data, and from the analysis where data covering the Lyman-forest were excluded (i.e. no UV data at wavelengths λ < 121.5 nm). The best-fit Fitzpatrick & Massa (1990, FM90) parameterisations to the SMC, LMC and Milky Way models from Clayton et al. (2003) are shown in italic as a comparison to the best-fit FM90 fits to our data.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.