Table 3
AB extinction derived from the map based on the Ciardullo et al. (1988) data as obtained in Melchior et al. (2000).
| Position | AB at 24″ | AB at 21″ (11″) | E(B − V) at 24″ | E(B − V) at 21″ | E(B − V) at 11″ | ICO/E(B − V) at 24″ | ICO/E(B − V) at 21″ |
| (mag beam-1) | (mag beam-1) | (mag beam-1) | (mag beam-1) | (mag beam-1) | (K km s-1 mag-1) | (K km s-1 mag-1) | |
|
|
|||||||
| M 31A | 0.095 | 0.100 (0.166) | 0.027 ± 0.003 | 0.029 ± 0.004 | 0.048 ± 0.006 | 28 ± 5 | 26 ± 5 |
| M 31D | 0.067 | 0.076 (0.111) | 0.019 ± 0.002 | 0.022 ± 0.003 | 0.032 ± 0.004 | 129 ± 22 | 116 ± 20 |
| M 31F | 0.074 | 0.081 (0.123) | 0.021 ± 0.003 | 0.023 ± 0.003 | 0.035 ± 0.004 | 69 ± 15 | |
| M 31G | 0.182 | 0.193 (0.256) | 0.052 ± 0.007 | 0.055 ± 0.007 | 0.073 ± 0.009 | 59 ± 11 | 56 ± 11 |
| M 31I | 0.210 | 0.219 (0.245) | 0.060 ± 0.008 | 0.063 ± 0.008 | 0.070 ± 0.009 | 52 ± 8 | |
| M 31J | 0.203 | 0.208 (0.241) | 0.058 ± 0.007 | 0.060 ± 0.008 | 0.069 ± 0.009 | 219 ± 33 (18 ± 4) | |
| M 31K | 0.138 | 0.141 (0.159) | 0.040 ± 0.005 | 0.040 ± 0.005 | 0.046 ± 0.006 | 67 ± 12 | |
Notes. For each configuration E(B − V) was then computed assuming RV in the range [2.1,3] . These values were computed assuming a fraction of foreground light x = 0. The ICO/E(B − V) ratio is then provided for the strongest lines. For M 31J we also provide the ratio corresponding to the ring velocity.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.