Table 1
Continuum flux distribution in Cha III and comparison to Cha I.
| Scale | Typical size | Flux | Mass | F/Ftot | F/Ftot(Cha I) |
| (Jy) | (M⊙) | (%) | (%) | ||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
|
|
|||||
| 3 | < 60″ | 3.5 | 1.9 | 8 | 11 |
| 4 | < 120″ | 10.3 | 5.4 | 24 | 22 |
| 5 | < 200″ | 23.0 | 12.2 | 54 | 49 |
| 6 | < 300″ | 36.9 | 19.5 | 86 | 82 |
| 7 | ~ all | 43.2 | 22.8 | 101 | 99 |
| – | all | 42.7 | 22.6 | 100 | 100 |
Notes. Last row corresponds to the full map, while rows 1 to 5 correspond to the sum of the filtered maps up to scale i listed in the first column (i.e., the sum map at scale i). Column 2 gives the range of sizes of the sources that significantly contribute to the emission with more than 40% of their peak flux density (see Col. 2 of Table C.1 of Paper I). Columns 5 and 6 give the fraction of flux detected in each map, for Cha III and I, respectively.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.