Highlight
Free Access

Table 1

A selection of important X-ray surveys of M 31.

Paper S+ #ofSrc* L X Field Comments
erg cm-2 s-1

Trinchieri & Fabbiano (1991, TF91) E 108 6.4 × 1036–1.3 × 1038 entire set of Einstein 16 sources showed variability
(0.2–4 keV) imaging observations
Primini et al. (1993, PFJ93) R (HRI) 86 1.8 × 1036 bulge region 18 sources variable;  ~3 transients
(0.2–4 keV)
Supper et al. (1997, 2001) R (PSPC) 560 5 × 1035–5 × 1038 whole galaxy two deep surveys
(SPH97, SHL2001) (0.1–2.4 keV) 491 sources not detected with Einstein
11 sources variable, 7 transients compared to Einstein
34 sources variable, 8 transients between ROSAT surveys
Osborne et al. (2001) X 116 6 × 1035 centre examined the  ~60 brightest sources for variability
(0.3–12 keV)
Kong et al. (2002b) C (ACIS-I) 204 2 × 1035 central  ~17′ × 17′ observations between 1999 and 2001
(0.3–7 keV)  ~50% of the sources are variable, 13 transients
Kaaret (2002) C (HRC) 142 2 × 1035–2 × 1038 centre one 47 ks observation; 46  ±  26% of the sources
(0.1–10 keV) with LX > 5  ×  1036 erg s-1 are variable
Di Stefano et al. (2002) C (ACIS-I/S) 28 5 × 1035–3 × 1038 3 disc fields bright X-ray binaries
(0.3–7 keV)
Di Stefano et al. (2004) C (ACIS-S S3) 33 3 disc fields + centre supersoft sources and quasisoft sources
Williams et al. (2004) C (HRC) 166 1.4 × 1036–5 × 1038 major axis + centre 25% showed significant variability
(0.1–10 keV)
Trudolyubov & Priedhorsky (2004) C, X 43  ~1035– ~1039 major axis + centre globular cluster study
(0.3–10 keV)
Pietsch et al. (2005b, PFH2005) X 856 4.4 × 1034–2.8 × 1038 major axis + centre source catalogue
(0.2–4.5 keV)
Pietsch et al. (2005a, PFF2005) C, R, X 21  ~1035– ~1038 centre correlations with optical novae
(0.2–1 keV)
Orio (2006) C, X 42 6 × 1035– ~1039 major axis + centre supersoft sources and quasisoft sources
(0.2–2 keV)
(0.3–10 keV)
Pietsch et al. (2007, PHS2007) C, X 46  ~1035– ~1038 centre correlations with optical novae
(0.2–1 keV)
Voss & Gilfanov (2007) C 263 5 × 1033–1.5 × 1038 bulge region low mass X-ray binary study
(0.5–8 keV)
Stiele et al. (2008, SPH2008) X 39 7 × 1034–6 × 1037 centre re-analysis of archival and new 2004 observations
300 4.4 × 1034–2.8 × 1038 time variability analysis; 149 sources with a significance
(0.2–4.5 keV) for variability  >3; 6 new X-ray binary candidates,
3 supernova remnant classifications were rejected
Shaw Greening et al. (2009, SBK2009) X 335  ~1034– ~1039 5 fields along background subtracted spectra and lightcurves for
(0.3–10 keV) major axis each source; 18 HMXB candidates, selected from their
power law photon index
Stiele et al. (2010) X 40 whole galaxy supersoft sources; comparing ROSAT, Chandra and
XMM-Newton catalogues

Notes. 

(+)

X-ray satellite(s) on which the study is based: E for Einstein, R for ROSAT, C for Chandra, and X for XMM-Newton (EPIC).

(*)

Number of sources.

(†)

observed luminosity range in the indicated energy band, assuming a distance of 780 kpc to M 31.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.