Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 530, June 2011
Article Number A25
Number of page(s) 6
Section Interstellar and circumstellar matter
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201016390
Published online 02 May 2011

© ESO, 2011

1. Introduction

HESS J1858+020 is a weak γ-ray source that has been detected with the Cherenkov telescope High Energy Stereoscopic System (H.E.S.S.). Though nearly a point-like source, its morphology is slightly extended by  ~5′ along its major axis. The source was detected at a significance level of 7σ with a differential spectral index of 2.2 ± 0.1 (Aharonian et al. 2008). The radio source G35.6-0.4, which was identified as a supernova remnant (SNR) by Green (2009), is seen in projection over the northern border of HESS J1858+020. The author estimated an age of 30 000 years for the SNR and a distance of  ~10.5 kpc. Paron & Giacani (2010) studied the interstellar medium (ISM) around the very-high energy source and, on the basis of 13CO J = 1−0 data, identified a molecular cloud composed of two clumps. One of these clumps is seen in projection over the southern border of SNR G35.6-0.4 and displays some kinematical signatures of disturbed gas, while the other clump coincides with the center of HESS J1858+020. On the basis of an IR study, Paron & Giacani (2010) found evidence of star formation activity in the second aforementioned clump. They suggested that the interaction between the SNR G35.6-0.4 and the molecular gas might be responsible for the γ-ray emission. They also argued that the star formation processes taking place in the region, could be an alternative or complementary mechanism for explaining the very-high energy emission.

In this paper, we present new molecular observations of the dense clump coincident with the HESS J1858+020 center that were carried out to enhance our understanding of the nature of the very-high energy emission.

2. Observations

The molecular observations were performed on July 14 and 15, 2010 with the 10 m Atacama Submillimeter Telescope Experiment (ASTE; Ezawa et al. 2004). We used the CATS345 GHz band receiver, which is a two-single band SIS receiver remotely tunable in the LO frequency range of 324–372 GHz. We simultaneously observed 12CO J = 3−2 at 345.796 GHz and HCO+ J = 4−3 at 356.734 GHz, mapping a region of 90′′  ×  90′′ centered at , (RA  =  18h58m19.5s, Dec  =   + 02°05′23.9′′, J2000). We also observed 13CO J = 3 − 2 at 330.588 GHz and CS J = 7 − 6 at 342.883 GHz towards the same center mapping a region of 40′′  ×  50′′. The mapping grid spacing was 10′′ and the integration time was 60 sec per pointing in both cases. All the observations were performed in position switching mode. We verified that the off position (, ) was free of emission.

thumbnail Fig. 1

Left: region of about 30′  ×  30′ towards SNR G35.6-0.4 presenting the emission at 8 μm with contours of the radio continuum emission at 20 cm. The contours levels are 17, 22, and 30 K. The first contour is slightly above the data 3σrms. The circle shows the position and the extension of HESS J1858+020. We note that the SNR is possibly partially superimposed on an HII region. Right: smaller portion of the region displaying the 8 μm emission and showing the area mapped with the molecular observations (yellow box).

We used the XF digital spectrometer with a bandwidth and spectral resolution set to 128 MHz and 125 kHz, respectively. The velocity resolution was 0.11 km s-1 and the half-power beamwidth (HPBW) was 22′′ at 345 GHz. The system temperature varied from Tsys = 150 to 200 K. The main beam efficiency was ηmb ~ 0.65. The spectra were Hanning smoothed to improve the signal-to-noise ratio and only linear or/and some third order polynomia were used for baseline fitting. The data were reduced with NEWSTAR and the spectra processed using the XSpec software package.

To complement the new molecular data, we used the mosaicked images from GLIMPSE and MIPSGAL surveys from the Spitzer-IRAC (3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8 μm) and Spitzer-MIPS (24 and 70 μm), respectively. IRAC has an angular resolution of between 15 and 19 and MIPS 6′′ at 24 μm. In addition, we analyzed the continuum emission at 1.1 mm obtained from the Bolocam Galactic Plane Survey (BGPS), which has a FWHM effective resolution of 30′′.

3. The studied region

In Fig. 1 (left), we present a region of about 30′  ×  30′ towards the SNR G35.6-0.4. The image displays the 8 μm emission from Spitzer-IRAC with contours of the radio continuum emission at 20 cm. The circle shows the position and the extension of  ~5′ of the source HESS J1858+020 (Aharonian et al. 2008). On the basis of the 8 μm emission tracing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), that partially borders the radio continuum emission extending to the south, we suggest that the SNR G35.6-0.4 partially overlaps an extended HII region, which is likely part of the same complex. This probably explains the confusion about the nature of G35.6-0.4 in the past years (see Green 2009, and references therein). Towards the center of HESS J1858+020, there is an emission peak of 8 μm, which, as studied by Paron & Giacani (2010), coincides with a molecular clump detected in the 13CO J = 1 − 0 line. Paron & Giacani (2010) detected evidence of star forming activity that coincides with this clump. This region is catalogued in the IRAS Catalogue of Point Sources (Version 2.0; Helou & Walker 1988) as IRAS 18558+0201. Figure 1 (right) shows an enlargement of the area of interest indicated by a yellow box the region where the new molecular observations were carried out.

thumbnail Fig. 2

Up: 12CO J = 3−2 spectra. Bottom: 13CO J = 3−2 spectra. The horizontal axis of each spectra is velocity, and ranges from 30 to 80 km s-1, while the vertical axis is brightness temperature and goes from  − 1 to 7 K. The center, i.e. the (0, 0) offset, in both lines is the same.

4. Results and discussion

Figure 2 (up) shows the 12CO J = 3 − 2 spectra obtained towards the observed region. Across the whole area, the main component at  ~53 km s-1, already detected in the 13CO J = 1−0 clump studied by Paron & Giacani (2010), is present. A second, less intense, component is observed mainly towards positive RA and negative Dec offsets (bottom left in the image) with a velocity of  ~64 km s-1. Owing to a lack of observing time, three positions were not observed (top right of the image). Figure 2 (bottom) displays the 13CO J = 3 − 2 spectra observed towards the central  ~20 square arcseconds. In the observed area, this line has a unique component centered at  ~53 km s-1. In both cases, the horizontal axis of each spectra is velocity and ranges from 30 to 80 km s-1, while the vertical axis is brightness temperature and goes from  − 1 to 7 K. The 12CO J = 3 − 2 component at  ~64 km s-1 has no correspondence neither in the 13CO J = 3 − 2 emission presented in this work, nor in the 13CO J = 1−0 emission analyzed in Paron & Giacani (2010). We suggest that this velocity component can be unrelated molecular gas seen along the line of sight. In what follows, we focus our analysis on the  ~53 km s-1 molecular component. Table 1 summarizes the derived parameters of the 12CO and 13CO J = 3 − 2 lines obtained from a Gaussian fitting. Tmb is the main beam peak brightness temperature, VLSR is the central velocity referred to the local standard of rest and Δv is the line width (FWHM). The Gaussian fitting was performed on the averaged spectrum of each line, which was obtained from the pointings within the area mapped by the 13CO emission, at the center of the region. The quoted uncertainties are formal 1σ value for the model of the Gaussian shape.

thumbnail Fig. 3

Two-color image with the 8 μm and 24 μm emissions presented in red and green, respectively. The contours correspond to the 12CO J = 3 − 2 emission integrated between 48 and 57 km s-1, at the levels of 22, 26, and 30 K km s-1. The rms noise is about 4 K km s-1. The circle represents the extension of the source HESS J1858+020.

Table 1

Parameters of the 12CO and 13CO J = 3 − 2 lines from the center of the region.

An inspection of the 12CO J = 3−2 spectra indicates that there are neither spectral wings nor intensity gradients along symmetric directions in the plane of the sky, which allows us to conclude that, at the present data resolution, there is no evidence of outflow activity neither in the plane of the sky nor along the line of sight. The detected molecular clump peaks approximately at the (10, 0) offset (see Fig. 2), corresponding to the sky positon , . Figure 3 displays a two color image with the 8 μm and 24 μm emissions shown in red and green, respectively, with contours of the 12CO J = 3−2 emission integrated between 48 and 57 km s-1. The circle represents the source HESS J1858+020. From this image, it can be appreciated that the molecular clump mapped in 12CO J = 3 − 2 coincides with the condensation of PAHs seen at 8 μm. This image reveals that this clump also emits at 24 μm, indicating warm dust. This clump, lying exactly at the geometric center of the HESS source, suggests that its study may help us to elucidate the nature of the high energy emission. We note that we did not detect any emission from the HCO+ J = 4 − 3 and CS J = 7 − 6 lines at sensitivity levels of about 0.13 and 0.2 K, respectively, in the direction of this molecular concentration.

Table 2

Near- and mid-IR fluxes of IRS1 and IRS2.

To estimate the physical parameters of the molecular clump, we assume LTE conditions and a beam filling factor of 1, which may not be completely true but allows us to make a first approach to the problem. From the peak temperature ratio of the CO isotopes (12Tmb/13Tmb), it is possible to estimate the optical depths from (e.g. Curtis et al. 2010)

where ν12 = 345.796 GHz and ν13 = 330.558 GHz are the transition frequencies of 12CO and 13CO J = 3 − 2 lines, respectively, τ12 is the optical depth of the 12CO gas, and [12CO]/[13CO] is the isotope abundance ratio. Assuming that 8 kpc is the distance to the Galactic center and using [12CO]/[13CO]  = (6.21 ± 1.00)DGC + (18.71 ± 7.37) (Milam et al. 2005) where DGC = 6.73 kpc is the distance between the source and the Galactic center, we obtain [12CO]/[13CO]  = 56.7 ± 13.5. Thus, the 12CO J = 3 − 2 optical depth is τ12 = 32 ± 11. Using the typical LTE equations and taking into account that the 12CO J = 3 − 2 line is optically thick as shown above, from its emission we estimate an excitation temperature of Tex = 17 ± 1 K. Using this factor and the 13CO J = 3 − 2 emission, we derive an optical depth for the 13CO of τ13 = 0.70 ± 0.12 and a 13CO column density of N(13CO)  = (8.2 ± 1.2) × 1015 cm-2. Adopting the isotope abundance ratio [12CO]/[13CO] used above and the relationship of N(H2)/N(12CO)  ~ 104 (see Black & Willner 1984, and reference therein), we obtain an H2 column density of N(H2)  = (5.0 ± 1.8) × 1021 cm-2. Finally, assuming spherical geometry for the clump, which is compatible with what is seen in Fig. 3, with a radius of  ~30′′ (~1.5 pc at the distance of 10.5 kpc), we estimate a mass and a volume density of  M, and  cm-3, respectively for this structure, where d is the distance. The quoted errors, of the order of 30%, do not include the error in the distance, which is a major unknown and depends on Galaxy models. We thus present the estimated values as a function of the distance.

Using the 13CO line width of Δv = 2 km s-1 and a radius of R = 1.5 pc, we also calculate the virial mass from Mvir = B × R × Δv2, where B is a constant that depends on the density profile. If one assumes a uniform density profile, that is ρ(r) = const., B = 210, while if a density profile ρ(r) ∝ 1/r is assumed, B = 190 (MacLaren et al. 1988). Both cases produce the same virial mass within the errors,  M. The ratio of the virial and the LTE mass is . Kawamura et al. (1998) performed a large-scale survey of molecular clouds towards the Gemini and Auriga regions and shows that star-forming 13CO clouds have low Mvir/MLTE, while all the clouds with high Mvir/MLTE have no sign of star formation. On the other hand, several molecular cores studied in the active star forming complex in Taurus have on average, Mvir/MLTE ~ 0.6 (Onishi et al. 1996), which is quite similar to the value of 0.8 derived here.

Another way to estimate the volume density of the molecular feature is by investigating of the dust content. Figure 4 displays the smoothed 1.1 mm continuum emission obtained from the BGPS (Aguirre et al. 2011) with the 12CO J = 3 − 2 contours presented in Fig. 3. The crosses indicate the position of two sources from the BGPS catalog (Rosolowsky et al. 2010), showing that the analyzed molecular clump coincides with the source BGPS G035.578-00.584.

thumbnail Fig. 4

BGPS continuum emission at 1.1 mm with the 12CO J = 3 − 2 contours presented in Fig. 3. The crosses indicate the position of two sources catalogued in the BGPS catalog.

According to the BGPS catalog, the source BGPS G035.578-00.584 has an integrated flux density at 1.1 mm of Sν = 0.37 ± 0.10 Jy and an elliptical shape with a major and minor axis of 169 and 136, respectively. The total mass of gas and dust in a core is proportional to the total flux density Sν, assuming that the dust emission at 1.1 mm is optically thin and both the dust temperature and opacity are independent of position within the core (Enoch et al. 2006). We can then calculate the core mass from the BGPS G035.578-00.584 flux density using

where κ1.1   mm = 0.0114 cm2 g-1 is the dust opacity estimated on the basis of the canonical gas-to-dust mass ratio of 100 (Enoch et al. 2006), d the distance, Bν the Planck function, and Td the dust temperature. Although the millimeter emission arises only from the dust, it is possible to infer the total mass of gas and dust because, as mentioned above, the dust opacity κ1.1   mm contains the gas-to-dust mass ratio (see Enoch et al. 2006). Following Rosolowsky et al. (2010), the above equation can be written as

Assuming a typical dust temperature of Td = 20 K and a distance of 10.5 kpc, we obtain a total mass for the core BGPS G035.578-00.584 of  M. Finally, using this mass and assuming an angular radius of 14′′ (R ~ 0.7 pc), from nH = 3M/(4πR3μmH), where mH is the hydrogen atom mass and μ = 2.37 the mean particle mass, we obtain a particle density of  cm-3. The adopted angular radius is based on the angular size of this object reported in the catalog. As can be appreciated, the minor axis size is smaller than the rms size of the BGPS beam, thus it is not possible to calculate the deconvolved angular radius following Rosolowsky et al. (2010).

In summary, from two different methods we obtain a density of a few 103 cm-3 for the studied clump. Taking into account the lack of emission of the CS J = 7 − 6 and HCO+ J = 4 − 3 lines, tracers of higher densities, we conclude that 103 − 104 cm-3 is a plausible range for the density in the clump.

4.1. Young stellar objects in the molecular clump

Paron & Giacani (2010) conducted a search for young stellar objects (YSOs) probably embedded in the molecular cloud mapped in the 13CO J = 1−0 line. Using the color criteria of Allen et al. (2004) for GLIMPSE sources, the authors found six YSO candidate sources. In this work, we search for YSOs probably embedded in the discovered 12CO J = 3−2 clump using criteria based on the intrinsic reddening of the sources and studying the physical parameters extracted from the YSOs spectral energy distributions (SEDs). These criteria assume that YSOs always display an intrinsic infrared excess that cannot be attributed to scattering and/or absorption of the ISM along the line of sight. We therefore used the GLIMPSE Point-Source Catalog to search for this kind of sources within the molecular clump. Robitaille et al. (2008) defined a color criterion to identify intrinsically red sources using data from the Spitzer-IRAC bands. Intrinsically red sources satisfy the condition m4.5 − m8.0 ≥ 1, where m4.5 and m8.0 are the magnitudes in the 4.5 and 8.0 μm bands, respectively. To consider the errors in the magnitudes, we use the following color criterion to select intrinsically red sources m4.5 − m8.0 + ε ≥ 1, where and Δ4.5 and Δ8.0 are the errors in the 4.5 and 8.0 μm bands, respectively. By inspecting a circular region of about 30′′ in radius centered at , , we find 27 GLIMPSE sources, and by applying the abovementioned color criterion, we find only two intrinsically red sources that appear to be related to the molecular clump, called SSTGLMC G035.5768-00.5862 and SSTGLMC G035.5765-00.5909, hereafter IRS1 and IRS2, respectively. These sources were classified as class I and II, respectively in Paron & Giacani (2010) following the Allen et al. (2004) classification. In view of our more complete study, we now suggest that IRS1 is very likely to be embedded in the analyzed molecular clump, while for IRS2, lying on the border of the observed region, the connection with the studied molecular feature is less compelling (see Fig. 5 left).

thumbnail Fig. 5

Left: location of sources IRS1 and IRS2. Right: SED of these sources performed with the tool developed by Robitaille et al. (2006, 2007). Black line shows the best fit, and the gray lines show subsequent good fits. The dashed line shows the stellar photosphere corresponding to the central source of the best fit model, as it would look in the absence of circumstellar dust. The points are the input fluxes.

Table 3

Parameters derived from the SED fitting of sources IRS1 and IRS2.

In Table 2, we present the catalogued near- and mid-IR fluxes of these sources extracted from the 2MASS and GLIMPSE point source catalogs. The fluxes at 24 μm were obtained from the MIPS image. These fluxes were used to calculate the SED of IRS1 and IRS2 using the tool developed by Robitaille et al. (2006, 2007), which is available online1. To compile the SED, we assume an interstellar absorption of between 10 and 30 mag. The lower value is compatible with the rough assumption of 1 mag per kpc that is commonly used. The upper value agrees with the visual absorption obtained from Av = 5 × 10-22N(H) (Bohlin et al. 1978) where N(H)  =  N(HI)  +  2N(H2) is the line-of-sight hydrogen column density towards this region, which we estimate to be about 5.8 × 1022 cm-2. This value was obtained from the HI column density derived from the VLA Galactic Plane Survey (VGPS) HI data (Stil et al. 2006) and from the H2 column density derived above. In Table 3, we report the main results of the SED fit output for IRS1 and IRS2. In Cols. 2 and 3, we report the χ2 of the YSO and stellar photosphere best-fit model, respectively. The remaining columns report the physical parameters of the source for the best-fit model: central source mass, disk mass, envelope mass, and envelope accretion rate, respectively. Figure 5 right shows the SED of these sources.

To relate the SED to the evolutionary stage of the YSO, Robitaille et al. (2006) defined three different stages based on the values of the central source mass M  , the disk mass Mdisk, and the envelope accretion rate env of the YSO. Stage I YSOs are those that have env/M   > 10-6   yr-1, i.e., protostars with large accretion envelopes; stage II are those with Mdisk/M   > 10-6 and env/M   < 10-6   yr-1, i.e., young objects with prominent disks; and stage III are those with Mdisk/M   < 10-6 and env/M   < 10-6   yr-1, i.e. evolved sources where the flux is dominated by the central source. According to this classification, we conclude that IRS1 and IRS2 are stage II sources. However, IRS2 must be younger than IRS1 because, as can be appreciated in Table 3, it has a massive envelope that must still be accreting mass. The evolutionary stage of IRS1 derived from its SED and the lack of evidence of molecular outflows in the clump where it is embedded, suggest that IRS1 is an evolved YSO probably in the last stages of formation. Moreover, the presence of a condensation of PAH around this source suggests that IRS1 could be a high-mass protostellar object (HMPO) that has not yet reached the ultracompact HII region stage.

4.2. The scenario

On the basis of the results presented above, we discuss the possible origin of the very high-energy emission.

As mentioned in Sect. 3, we propose that the SNR G35.6-0.4 partially overlaps an extended HII region, whose eastern border is delineated by PAHs revealed by the 8 μm emission. A molecular cloud composed of at least two clumps lies over this border, and one of them is located at the center of HESS J1858+02. We have shown that there is at least one YSO embedded in this clump (that we called IRS1), which can, in principle, create a population of relativistic particles inside the host molecular cloud via a thermal jet. These particles, in a high density ambient environment matter can produce γ-ray emission by means of inverse Compton and relativistic bremsstrahlung losses (Araudo et al. 2007). However, for IRS1, at the present data resolution, no evidence of molecular outflows has been found in either the plane of the sky or along the line of sight, therefore weakening the probability of a physical link between IRS1 and HESS J1858+020. Since we have demonstrated that a YSO in the molecular clump is unlikely to play a decisive role in producing the observed γ-rays, and because of the lack of any other candidate in the region at any distance, we conclude that the only possible Galactic counterpart to the HESS source is the SNR G35.6-0.4 with its molecular enviroment. In this case, the supernova shock is a source of accelerated cosmic rays and the dense molecular clump provides the nuclei responsible for the production of neutral pions (by means of inelastic pp collisions), which will decay yielding the observed γ-rays.

5. Summary

Using molecular observations obtained with the Atacama Submillimeter Telescope Experiment (ASTE) and IR and submillimeter continuum archival data, we have studied a molecular clump associated with the IR source IRAS 18558+0201 that lies at the center of the very-high energy source HESS J1858+020. Our main results can be summarized as follows:

  • (a)

    From the 12CO and 13CO J = 3 − 2 lines and the 1.1 mm continuum emission for this clump we have measured a density between 3 and 4 cm-3. This clump is part of a larger molecular cloud that is being disturbed by the SNR G35.6-0.4 and a nearby extended HII region.

  • (b)

    From the analysis of the mid-IR data and a photometric study, we have discovered a YSO very likely embedded in the aforementioned molecular clump. Analyzing its spectral energy distribution, we suggest that this source could be a high-mass protostellar object that has not yet reached the ultracompact HII region stage.

  • (c)

    We did not find any evidence of molecular outflows from the discovered YSO that would reveal the presence of a thermal jet capable by itself of generating the very-high energy emission.

  • (d)

    We conclude that a clumpy molecular cloud, similar to the one investigated in this work, is the most plausible explanation of the very-high energy emission. The molecular gas may be acting as a target for the cosmic rays accelerated by the shock front of the SNR G35.6-0.4 generating the γ-ray emission by means of hadronic processes.


Acknowledgments

S.P., E.G. and G.D. are members of the Carrera del Investigador Científico of CONICET, Argentina. This work was partially supported by Argentina grants awarded by Universidad de Buenos Aires, CONICET and ANPCYT. M.R. wishes to acknowledge support from FONDECYT (CHILE) grant No. 108033. She is supported by the Chilean Center for Astrophysics FONDAP No. 15010003. S.P. and M.R. are grateful to Dr. Shinya Komugi for the support received during the observations. We wish to thank the anonymous referee whose comments and suggestions have helped to improve the paper.

References

  1. Aguirre, J. E., Ginsburg, A. G., Dunham, M. K., et al. 2011, ApJS, 192, 4 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aharonian, F., Akhperjanian, A. G., Barres de Almeida, U., et al. 2008, A&A, 477, 353 [Google Scholar]
  3. Allen, L. E., Calvet, N., D’Alessio, P., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 363 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Araudo, A. T., Romero, G. E., Bosch-Ramon, V., & Paredes, J. M. 2007, A&A, 476, 1289 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  5. Black, J. H., & Willner, S. P. 1984, ApJ, 279, 673 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bohlin, R. C., Savage, B. D., & Drake, J. F. 1978, ApJ, 224, 132 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Curtis, E. I., Richer, J. S., Swift, J. J., & Williams, J. P. 2010, MNRAS, 408, 1516 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Enoch, M. L., Young, K. E., Glenn, J., et al. 2006, ApJ, 638, 293 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ezawa, H., Kawabe, R., Kohno, K., & Yamamoto, S. 2004, in SPIE Conf. 5489, ed. J. M. Oschmann, Jr., 763 [Google Scholar]
  10. Green, D. A. 2009, MNRAS, 399, 177 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Helou, G., & Walker, D. W. 1988, Infrared astronomical satellite (IRAS) catalogs and atlases, The small scale structure catalog, 7 [Google Scholar]
  12. Kawamura, A., Onishi, T., Yonekura, Y., et al. 1998, ApJS, 117, 387 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. MacLaren, I., Richardson, K. M., & Wolfendale, A. W. 1988, ApJ, 333, 821 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Milam, S. N., Savage, C., Brewster, M. A., Ziurys, L. M., & Wyckoff, S. 2005, ApJ, 634, 1126 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Onishi, T., Mizuno, A., Kawamura, A., Ogawa, H., & Fukui, Y. 1996, ApJ, 465, 815 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Paron, S., & Giacani, E. 2010, A&A, 509, L4 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  17. Robitaille, T. P., Whitney, B. A., Indebetouw, R., Wood, K., & Denzmore, P. 2006, ApJS, 167, 256 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Robitaille, T. P., Whitney, B. A., Indebetouw, R., & Wood, K. 2007, ApJS, 169, 328 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Robitaille, T. P., Meade, M. R., Babler, B. L., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 2413 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rosolowsky, E., Dunham, M. K., Ginsburg, A., et al. 2010, ApJS, 188, 123 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stil, J. M., Taylor, A. R., Dickey, J. M., et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 1158 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

All Tables

Table 1

Parameters of the 12CO and 13CO J = 3 − 2 lines from the center of the region.

Table 2

Near- and mid-IR fluxes of IRS1 and IRS2.

Table 3

Parameters derived from the SED fitting of sources IRS1 and IRS2.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Left: region of about 30′  ×  30′ towards SNR G35.6-0.4 presenting the emission at 8 μm with contours of the radio continuum emission at 20 cm. The contours levels are 17, 22, and 30 K. The first contour is slightly above the data 3σrms. The circle shows the position and the extension of HESS J1858+020. We note that the SNR is possibly partially superimposed on an HII region. Right: smaller portion of the region displaying the 8 μm emission and showing the area mapped with the molecular observations (yellow box).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

Up: 12CO J = 3−2 spectra. Bottom: 13CO J = 3−2 spectra. The horizontal axis of each spectra is velocity, and ranges from 30 to 80 km s-1, while the vertical axis is brightness temperature and goes from  − 1 to 7 K. The center, i.e. the (0, 0) offset, in both lines is the same.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

Two-color image with the 8 μm and 24 μm emissions presented in red and green, respectively. The contours correspond to the 12CO J = 3 − 2 emission integrated between 48 and 57 km s-1, at the levels of 22, 26, and 30 K km s-1. The rms noise is about 4 K km s-1. The circle represents the extension of the source HESS J1858+020.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

BGPS continuum emission at 1.1 mm with the 12CO J = 3 − 2 contours presented in Fig. 3. The crosses indicate the position of two sources catalogued in the BGPS catalog.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5

Left: location of sources IRS1 and IRS2. Right: SED of these sources performed with the tool developed by Robitaille et al. (2006, 2007). Black line shows the best fit, and the gray lines show subsequent good fits. The dashed line shows the stellar photosphere corresponding to the central source of the best fit model, as it would look in the absence of circumstellar dust. The points are the input fluxes.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.