Free Access
Table 3
Details to the diameter measurements presented in Fig. 9.
Author | Model | Phasea | Comments and position angles (PA) | |
|
||||
A: | Lattanzi et al. (1997) | UD | 0.64 | two perpendicular axes (η ≈ 0.86, PA ≈ 143°, 583 nm) |
B: | Ireland et al. (2004a) | Gaussian | 0.44 | upper curve for PA 120° and lower curve for PA 252° (0.7–1.0 μm) |
C: | Haniff et al. (1995) | UD | 0.04 | uniform disk diameter at 700 and 710 nm |
D: | Tuthill et al. (1999) | Gaussian | 0.04 | elliptical Gaussian at 700 and 710 nm (η ≈ 0.94, PA ≈ 93°) |
E: | Monnier et al. (2004) | UD | 0.50 | UD model was reported as a bad fit to the data (K band) |
F: | Woodruff et al. (2009) | UD | 0.58–1.53 | curves for phase 0.58 (middle), 0.79 (lower) and 1.53 (upper) |
G: | Woodruff et al. (2008) | UD | 0.50–1.00 | mean of multiple measurements in given phase range (J,H,K, & L band) |
H: | Millan-Gabet et al. (2005) | UD | 0.60 | UD diameter for H and K bands |
I: | Wishnow et al. (2010) | UD | 0.1–1.1 | assumed photospheric UD diameter at 11.15 μm, reported as not very accurate |
J: | this work | FDD | 0.00 & 0.50 | curves for full data set (middle), max (upper), and min (lower) light |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.